Suppr超能文献

胸主动脉瘤快速生长:现实还是神话?

Rapid growth of thoracic aortic aneurysm: Reality or myth?

机构信息

Yale University School of Medicine, Aortic Institute at Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Conn.

Yale University School of Medicine, Aortic Institute at Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Conn.

出版信息

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 Apr;167(4):1206-1213. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2022.06.021. Epub 2022 Jul 12.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The American Association for Thoracic Surgery 2010 guidelines stipulate that rapid growth of the aorta (>3 mm/y) is an indication for prophylactic surgical intervention. Because of the many potential sources of error in aortic measurement (including measurement variability and comparison of noncorresponding segments), we explored whether rapid aortic growth was a reality or a falsehood.

METHODS

Among 2781 patients with aortic disease who were treated over 3 decades, we examined aortic growth rate in 811 patients with at least 2 aortic images taken at least 2 years apart. We identified 42 ascending and 27 descending patients with putative rapid aortic growth. A team of experienced clinicians reread the source images.

RESULTS

Among the 42 ascending patients with putative rapid aortic growth, rapid growth was confirmed in 12 and refuted in 11 (19 images nonretrievable). Among the 27 descending patients, rapid growth was confirmed in 6 and refuted in 4 (17 images nonretrievable). We calculated lower, middle, and highest possible rapid growth rates by prorating positivity rates for nonretrievable scans. Lowest, middle, and highest possible rates of rapid growth were 2.7%, 4.7%, and 6.9% for ascending aorta, and 1.6%, 4.3%, and 7.3% for descending aneurysms, respectively. Middle rates are considered most accurately reflective. Of the patients with confirmed rapid growth, 3 of 4 inoperable patients succumbed to their aorta. Twenty-three patients underwent prompt surgery, with 22 survivors. For the rapidly growing aortas, operative, pathologic, and genetic findings are reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Although not a falsehood, rapid growth is uncommon for the ascending and descending aorta. Many putative cases are reflective of measurement error. Attention to potential sources of measurement error is key. VIDEO ABSTRACT.

摘要

目的

美国胸外科学会 2010 年指南规定,主动脉快速生长(>3mm/y)是预防性手术干预的指征。由于主动脉测量存在许多潜在误差源(包括测量变异性和非对应节段的比较),我们探讨了主动脉快速生长是现实还是假象。

方法

在过去 30 多年中,我们对 2781 例主动脉疾病患者进行了治疗,在至少 2 次相隔至少 2 年的主动脉图像中检查了 811 例患者的主动脉生长速度。我们确定了 42 例升主动脉和 27 例降主动脉疑似快速主动脉生长的患者。一组经验丰富的临床医生重新阅读了原始图像。

结果

在 42 例疑似升主动脉快速生长的患者中,12 例得到证实,11 例被反驳(19 例图像无法检索)。在 27 例降主动脉患者中,6 例得到证实,4 例被反驳(17 例图像无法检索)。我们通过推算不可检索扫描的阳性率来计算最低、中值和最高可能的快速生长率。升主动脉的最低、中值和最高可能生长率分别为 2.7%、4.7%和 6.9%,降主动脉动脉瘤分别为 1.6%、4.3%和 7.3%。中值被认为最能准确反映实际情况。在得到证实的快速生长患者中,4 例不能手术的患者中有 3 例死于主动脉。23 例患者接受了及时手术,22 例存活。报告了快速生长的主动脉的手术、病理和遗传发现。

结论

尽管不是虚假的,但升主动脉和降主动脉的快速生长并不常见。许多疑似病例反映了测量误差。注意潜在的测量误差源是关键。视频摘要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验