Department of Radiology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
Department of Radiology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2023 Mar-Apr;52(2):106-109. doi: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2022.07.012. Epub 2022 Jul 30.
The purpose of this study was to examine patient portal enrollment and the usage with a specific focus on the utilization of on-line radiology reports by patients. Oracle SQL (Austin, TX, USA) queries were used to extract portal enrollment data over a 13-month period from March 1, 2017 through March 31, 2018 from the hospital system's EMR. Patient enrollment was collected as was patient information including basic demographics and utilization patterns. For enrolled patients, interaction within the portal with the "Radiology" work tab (RADTAB) was used as a surrogate for review of radiology results. As a comparator, interaction within the portal with the "Laboratory" work tab (LABTAB) was used as a surrogate for review of laboratory results. Statistical analysis on the data was performed using Chi-squared, Student's t-test, Logistic regression and multivariate analysis where appropriate. The population for analysis included 424,422 patients. Overall, 138,783 patients (32.7%) were enrolled in the portal. Patients enrolled in the portal were older (P < 0.0001), female (P < 0.0001) and Caucasian (P < 0.0001). Patients enrolled in the portal had higher levels of educational attainment (p < 0.0001), higher annual household income (P < 0.0001), and more outpatient clinic visits (P < 0.0001). The proportion of enrolled patients that interacted with the LABTAB (47.2%) was significantly higher than those that interacted with the RADTAB (27.1%) (P < 0.0001; Table 2). Patients that utilize the portal are more likely to utilize the Laboratory tab than the Radiology tab, and demographic differences do not account for this difference in usage. Further investigation is needed to better understand the reasons for the differing usage trends of Laboratory and Radiology tabs.
这项研究的目的是考察患者门户的注册情况和使用情况,特别关注患者对在线放射学报告的使用情况。使用来自医院电子病历系统的 Oracle SQL(奥斯汀,德克萨斯州,美国)查询,在 2017 年 3 月 1 日至 2018 年 3 月 31 日的 13 个月期间提取门户注册数据。收集患者注册信息和患者信息,包括基本人口统计学和使用模式。对于注册患者,使用门户内与“放射科”工作标签(RADTAB)的交互作为查看放射学结果的替代指标。作为比较,使用门户内与“实验室”工作标签(LABTAB)的交互作为查看实验室结果的替代指标。对数据进行了卡方检验、学生 t 检验、逻辑回归和多变量分析等统计分析。分析人群包括 424422 名患者。总体而言,有 138783 名患者(32.7%)注册了门户。注册门户的患者年龄更大(P<0.0001)、女性(P<0.0001)和白种人(P<0.0001)。注册门户的患者受教育程度更高(p<0.0001)、年收入更高(P<0.0001)、门诊就诊次数更多(P<0.0001)。与 LABTAB 交互的注册患者比例(47.2%)明显高于与 RADTAB 交互的患者比例(27.1%)(P<0.0001;表 2)。使用门户的患者更有可能使用实验室标签,而不是放射科标签,并且人口统计学差异并不能解释这种使用差异。需要进一步调查以更好地了解实验室和放射科标签使用趋势不同的原因。