• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

数字接触者追踪应用程序在 COVID-19 防控中的应用:系统评价。

Digital Contact Tracing Applications against COVID-19: A Systematic Review.

机构信息

Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, UK.

Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College, London, UK.

出版信息

Med Princ Pract. 2022;31(5):424-432. doi: 10.1159/000526672. Epub 2022 Aug 26.

DOI:10.1159/000526672
PMID:36030770
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9801373/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The novel coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has triggered public anxiety around the world. So far, the evidence suggests that prevention on a public scale is the most effective health measure for thwarting the progress of COVID-19. Another critical aspect of preventing COVID-19 is contact tracing. We aimed to investigate the effectiveness of digital contact tracing applications currently available in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

We undertook a systematic review and narrative synthesis of all literature relating to digital contact tracing applications in the context of COVID-19. We searched 3 major scientific databases. Only articles that were published in English and were available as full-text articles were selected for review. Data were extracted and narrative syntheses conducted.

RESULTS

Five studies relating to COVID-19 were included in the review. Our results suggest that digitalized contact tracing methods can be beneficial for impeding the progress of COVID-19. Three key themes were generated from this systematic review. First, the critical mass of adoption of applications must be attained at the population level before the sensitivity and positive predictive value of the solution can be increased. Second, usability factors such as access, ease of use, and the elimination of barriers are essential in driving this uptake. Third, privacy must be ensured where possible as it is the single most significant barrier against achieving critical mass.

CONCLUSION

Contact tracing methods have proved to be beneficial for impeding the progress of COVID-19 as compared to older, more labour-intensive manual methods.

摘要

目的

2019 年新型冠状病毒(COVID-19)大流行在全球引发了公众焦虑。到目前为止,有证据表明,大规模预防是阻止 COVID-19 进展的最有效卫生措施。预防 COVID-19 的另一个关键方面是接触者追踪。我们旨在研究目前在 COVID-19 大流行背景下可用的数字接触追踪应用程序的有效性。

方法

我们对所有与 COVID-19 背景下的数字接触追踪应用程序相关的文献进行了系统评价和叙述性综合。我们搜索了 3 个主要的科学数据库。仅选择发表在英语且可作为全文文章的文章进行审查。提取数据并进行叙述性综合。

结果

本综述纳入了 5 项与 COVID-19 相关的研究。我们的研究结果表明,数字化接触追踪方法可以有益于阻止 COVID-19 的传播。从这项系统评价中产生了 3 个关键主题。首先,必须在人群层面上达到应用程序的临界采用量,才能提高解决方案的敏感性和阳性预测值。其次,可用性因素(如可及性、易用性和消除障碍)对于推动这种采用至关重要。第三,在可能的情况下必须确保隐私,因为这是实现临界采用量的唯一最大障碍。

结论

与较旧的、更劳动密集型的手动方法相比,接触者追踪方法已被证明有益于阻止 COVID-19 的传播。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/350c/9801373/82814816a6ea/mpp-0031-0424-g02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/350c/9801373/23da16e4d077/mpp-0031-0424-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/350c/9801373/82814816a6ea/mpp-0031-0424-g02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/350c/9801373/23da16e4d077/mpp-0031-0424-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/350c/9801373/82814816a6ea/mpp-0031-0424-g02.jpg

相似文献

1
Digital Contact Tracing Applications against COVID-19: A Systematic Review.数字接触者追踪应用程序在 COVID-19 防控中的应用:系统评价。
Med Princ Pract. 2022;31(5):424-432. doi: 10.1159/000526672. Epub 2022 Aug 26.
2
Factors Influencing the Adoption of Contact Tracing Applications: Systematic Review and Recommendations.影响接触者追踪应用程序采用的因素:系统评价与建议
Front Digit Health. 2022 May 3;4:862466. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.862466. eCollection 2022.
3
Citizen-Centered Mobile Health Apps Collecting Individual-Level Spatial Data for Infectious Disease Management: Scoping Review.以公民为中心的移动健康应用程序收集传染病管理的个体层面空间数据:范围综述。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Nov 10;8(11):e22594. doi: 10.2196/22594.
4
State of the Art in Adoption of Contact Tracing Apps and Recommendations Regarding Privacy Protection and Public Health: Systematic Review.接触者追踪应用程序的应用现状以及关于隐私保护和公共卫生的建议:系统评价
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Jun 10;9(6):e23250. doi: 10.2196/23250.
5
The role of digital tools and emerging devices in COVID-19 contact tracing during the first 18 months of the pandemic: a systematic review.数字工具和新兴设备在大流行头 18 个月 COVID-19 接触者追踪中的作用:系统评价。
Eur J Public Health. 2024 Jul 1;34(Supplement_1):i11-i28. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckae039.
6
Peer-to-Peer Contact Tracing: Development of a Privacy-Preserving Smartphone App.点对点接触追踪:隐私保护智能手机应用程序的开发。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Apr 7;8(4):e18936. doi: 10.2196/18936.
7
Digital Contact Tracing, Privacy, and Public Health.数字接触者追踪、隐私和公共卫生。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2020 May;50(3):43-46. doi: 10.1002/hast.1131.
8
The Roles of General Health and COVID-19 Proximity in Contact Tracing App Usage: Cross-sectional Survey Study.一般健康状况和与 COVID-19 的接近程度在接触者追踪应用程序使用中的作用:横断面调查研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Aug 18;7(8):e27892. doi: 10.2196/27892.
9
Considerations for the Design and Implementation of COVID-19 Contact Tracing Apps: Scoping Review.考虑设计和实施 COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序的因素:范围综述。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Jun 9;9(6):e27102. doi: 10.2196/27102.
10
Public health effectiveness of digital contact tracing in the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review of available data.数字接触者追踪在 COVID-19 大流行中的公共卫生效果:现有数据的系统评价。
Acta Biomed. 2021 Dec 10;92(S6):e2021439. doi: 10.23750/abm.v92iS6.12237.

引用本文的文献

1
Non-pharmaceutical interventions to reduce COVID-19 transmission in the UK: a rapid mapping review and interactive evidence gap map.非药物干预措施以降低英国 COVID-19 传播:快速映射综述和交互式证据差距图。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2024 May 29;46(2):e279-e293. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdae025.
2
Ten Years of TeleHealth and Digital Healthcare: Where Are We?远程医疗与数字医疗十年:我们如今身处何方?
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Mar 17;11(6):875. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11060875.
3
The German COVID-19 Digital Contact Tracing App: A Socioeconomic Evaluation.

本文引用的文献

1
Measuring the scientific effectiveness of contact tracing: Evidence from a natural experiment.衡量接触者追踪的科学效果:来自自然实验的证据。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Aug 17;118(33). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2100814118.
2
A global panel database of pandemic policies (Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker).一个全球性的大流行病政策面板数据库(牛津 COVID-19 政府应对追踪器)。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Apr;5(4):529-538. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01079-8. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
3
Evaluation of the Design and Implementation of a Peer-To-Peer COVID-19 Contact Tracing Mobile App (COCOA) in Japan.
德国 COVID-19 数字接触追踪应用:社会经济评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 2;19(21):14318. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192114318.
评估日本一款点对点 COVID-19 接触者追踪移动应用程序(COCOA)的设计与实现。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Dec 1;8(12):e22098. doi: 10.2196/22098.
4
Contact tracing with digital assistance in Taiwan's COVID-19 outbreak response.台湾 COVID-19 疫情应对中的数字化接触者追踪。
Int J Infect Dis. 2020 Dec;101:348-352. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.09.1483. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
5
Performance of Digital Contact Tracing Tools for COVID-19 Response in Singapore: Cross-Sectional Study.新加坡数字接触者追踪工具在 COVID-19 应对中的表现:横断面研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Oct 29;8(10):e23148. doi: 10.2196/23148.
6
COVID-19 and social distancing.新型冠状病毒肺炎与社交距离
Z Gesundh Wiss. 2022;30(1):259-261. doi: 10.1007/s10389-020-01321-z. Epub 2020 May 25.
7
Effects of Proactive Social Distancing on COVID-19 Outbreaks in 58 Cities, China.中国 58 个城市积极主动的社交距离措施对 COVID-19 疫情爆发的影响。
Emerg Infect Dis. 2020 Sep;26(9):2267-9. doi: 10.3201/eid2609.201932. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
8
Case-Initiated COVID-19 Contact Tracing Using Anonymous Notifications.基于病例的 COVID-19 接触者追踪利用匿名通知。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Jun 22;8(6):e20369. doi: 10.2196/20369.
9
Digital Smartphone Tracking for COVID-19: Public Health and Civil Liberties in Tension.用于新冠疫情的数字智能手机追踪:公共卫生与公民自由陷入紧张关系
JAMA. 2020 Jun 16;323(23):2371-2372. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.8570.
10
COVID-19 transforms health care through telemedicine: Evidence from the field.COVID-19 通过远程医疗改变医疗保健:来自现场的证据。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Jul 1;27(7):1132-1135. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa072.