• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用《喂食者问卷》评估夫妻中喂食者的动机和行为。

Assessing feeder motivations and behaviour within couples using the Feeder Questionnaire.

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7XH, UK.

出版信息

Appetite. 2022 Dec 1;179:106285. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2022.106285. Epub 2022 Aug 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.appet.2022.106285
PMID:36030908
Abstract

This study first aimed to provide additional validation for a new tool to measure Feeder Motivations and Behaviour. Second, it aimed to evaluate how feeder motivations and behaviour are enacted within romantic relationships and whether this reflects a reciprocal or linear dynamic. Participants completed the Feeder Questionnaire composed of six motivational subscales (affection; waste avoidance; status; hunger avoidance; offloading; manners) and one subscale to measure feeder behaviour, measures of eating behaviour (restrained, emotional and external eating) and their BMI. Participants were analysed as individuals (n = 190) and within couples as dyads (n = 76 couples). In terms of validation of the measure, analysis using the non-dyadic data showed good internal reliability for all subscales and moderate correlations between feeder behaviour and motivations and measures of eating behaviour. In terms of couple dynamics, dyadic data analysis indicated evidence for reciprocity within couples for BMI, feeder behaviour and feeder motivations relating to waste avoidance, affection, manners and status but not for hunger avoidance or offloading. Dyadic analysis also indicated evidence for a more linear relationship with one participant's feeder behaviour and motivations relating to their partner's emotional and external eating. This study therefore provides further support for the usefulness of the Feeder Questionnaire. The study also indicates that feeder behaviour is complex within couples and may function in a reciprocal way but also with one partner's behaviour impacting upon their partner in a more linear fashion.

摘要

本研究首先旨在为一种新的测量喂养动机和行为的工具提供额外的验证。其次,旨在评估喂养者的动机和行为在浪漫关系中是如何表现的,以及这是否反映了一种互惠或线性的动态。参与者完成了由六个动机分量表(情感、避免浪费、地位、避免饥饿、卸责、礼貌)和一个衡量喂养行为的分量表、饮食行为(克制、情绪和外部进食)和他们的 BMI 组成的喂养者问卷。参与者作为个体(n=190)和作为夫妻对(n=76 对)进行分析。在测量验证方面,使用非夫妻数据的分析显示,所有分量表的内部可靠性良好,喂养行为与动机以及饮食行为测量之间存在中度相关性。在夫妻动态方面,夫妻数据分析表明,夫妻双方的 BMI、喂养行为和与避免浪费、情感、礼貌和地位有关的喂养动机存在互惠关系,但与避免饥饿或卸责无关。夫妻分析还表明,一个参与者的喂养行为和与伴侣的情绪和外部进食有关的动机之间存在更线性的关系。因此,本研究进一步支持了喂养者问卷的有用性。该研究还表明,喂养者的行为在夫妻关系中是复杂的,可能以互惠的方式运作,但也可能是一方的行为以更线性的方式影响另一方。

相似文献

1
Assessing feeder motivations and behaviour within couples using the Feeder Questionnaire.使用《喂食者问卷》评估夫妻中喂食者的动机和行为。
Appetite. 2022 Dec 1;179:106285. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2022.106285. Epub 2022 Aug 27.
2
A new measurement tool to assess the deliberate overfeeding of others: The Feeder questionnaire.一种评估故意过度喂养他人的新测量工具:喂养者问卷。
Clin Obes. 2020 Aug;10(4):e12366. doi: 10.1111/cob.12366. Epub 2020 May 3.
3
An examination of accuracy and bias in perceptions of a partner's motives for health behaviour regulation.考察对伴侣进行健康行为调节的动机的感知的准确性和偏差。
Br J Health Psychol. 2018 Nov;23(4):872-887. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12321. Epub 2018 Jun 7.
4
Effects of Social Control on Eating and Relational Behaviors in Romantic Relationships.社会控制对浪漫关系中进食和人际关系行为的影响。
Ann Behav Med. 2022 Nov 18;56(12):1244-1258. doi: 10.1093/abm/kaac011.
5
Motivations for providing a secure base: links with attachment orientation and secure base support behavior.提供安全基地的动机:与依恋定向和安全基地支持行为的联系。
Attach Hum Dev. 2013;15(3):261-80. doi: 10.1080/14616734.2013.782654. Epub 2013 Apr 13.
6
Pilot Validation Study on the Tavistock Relationships Observational Scale for the Assessment of the Quality of Dyadic Relationships in Couples in Which One Partner Has Dementia.塔维斯托克关系观察量表在评估一方患有痴呆症的夫妻关系质量中的初步验证研究。
J Nurs Meas. 2021 Aug 1;29(2):283-301. doi: 10.1891/JNM-D-19-00073. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
7
A framework for modelling fertility motivation in couples.夫妻生育动机建模框架。
Popul Stud (Camb). 2004;58(2):193-205. doi: 10.1080/0032472042000213712.
8
Motivations for caregiving in adult intimate relationships: influences on caregiving behavior and relationship functioning.成年亲密关系中照顾他人的动机:对照顾行为和关系功能的影响。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2003 Aug;29(8):950-68. doi: 10.1177/0146167203252807.
9
Validation of the Adult Eating Behaviour Questionnaire adapted for the French-speaking Canadian population.适用于加拿大法语区人群的成人饮食行为问卷的验证
Eat Weight Disord. 2022 Apr;27(3):1163-1179. doi: 10.1007/s40519-021-01229-x. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
10
Oxytocin during the initial stages of romantic attachment: relations to couples' interactive reciprocity.浪漫依恋初期的催产素:与夫妻互动互惠的关系。
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2012 Aug;37(8):1277-85. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2011.12.021. Epub 2012 Jan 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Sabotage, Collusion, and Being a Feeder: Towards a New Model of Negative Social Support and Its Impact on Weight Management.破坏、勾结和喂养:一种新的负面社会支持模型及其对体重管理的影响。
Curr Obes Rep. 2023 Jun;12(2):183-190. doi: 10.1007/s13679-023-00504-5. Epub 2023 Jun 7.