Department of One Health, Medical and Cancer Research Institute; Animal Welfare Center, Nyala, Sudan.
Department of Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Botswana University of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Gaborone, Botswana; Department of Physiology and Biochemistry, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Nyala, Nyala, Sudan; Biomedical Research Institute, Darfur University College, Nyala, Sudan.
J Equine Vet Sci. 2022 Nov;118:104110. doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2022.104110. Epub 2022 Aug 27.
In impoverished nations, donkeys help people make a living. The welfare of donkeys in Sudan is neglected compared with developed countries. However, there is no information available about donkey welfare in Nyala. This study aimed to assess the welfare of donkeys in Nyala. Donkeys were divided into two groups (n = 50), working and nonworking. The donkeys' physical, emotional, and clinical parameters and an owner's interview were assessed. There were significant differences in body condition scores: 37% and 47% of working and nonworking donkeys, respectively, had ideal body condition scores, while 13% of working donkeys were emaciated. Of the working and nonworking 33% and 19% had hoof problems, respectively. Fifteen percent of working donkeys had ocular discharge, and 25% had wounds. In working donkeys, 7% and 5% depressive and aggressive behavioral responses, respectively, were observed. Furthermore, there were significant differences in tools used for hitting donkeys, with 33% and 17% of owners using a stick and whip, respectively, for hitting working donkeys. Eighty-two percent of owners feed their donkeys one to three times daily (50% working and 32% nonworking donkeys), and free access feeding was only observed in 18% of nonworking donkeys. There were no significant differences (P > .06) in emotional parameters. We conclude that working donkeys suffer from multiple welfare problems more than nonworking donkeys in Nyala. More awareness, veterinary services, and research are needed to improve donkey care in Nyala.
在贫困国家,驴子帮助人们谋生。与发达国家相比,苏丹的驴子福利被忽视了。然而,目前还没有关于尼亚拉驴福利的信息。本研究旨在评估尼亚拉驴的福利。将驴子分为两组(n=50),工作和不工作。评估了驴子的身体、情绪和临床参数以及主人的访谈。身体状况评分存在显著差异:分别有 37%和 47%的工作和不工作的驴子具有理想的身体状况评分,而 13%的工作驴子消瘦。工作和不工作的驴子中,分别有 33%和 19%有蹄问题。15%的工作驴子有眼部分泌物,25%有伤口。在工作驴子中,分别观察到 7%和 5%的抑郁和攻击性行为反应。此外,用于打驴子的工具存在显著差异,分别有 33%和 17%的主人使用棍子和鞭子打工作驴子。82%的主人每天喂驴子一到三次(50%的工作驴子和 32%的不工作驴子),只有 18%的不工作驴子可以自由进食。情绪参数没有显著差异(P>.06)。我们得出结论,与不工作的驴子相比,工作的驴子在尼亚拉遭受多种福利问题的困扰更多。需要提高对尼亚拉驴子的认识、兽医服务和研究,以改善驴子的护理。