Suppr超能文献

行人碰撞类型与乘用车类型的关系。

Relationship of pedestrian crash types and passenger vehicle types.

机构信息

Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, 4121 Wilson Boulevard, 6th Floor, Arlington, VA 22203, United States.

Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, 4121 Wilson Boulevard, 6th Floor, Arlington, VA 22203, United States.

出版信息

J Safety Res. 2022 Sep;82:392-401. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2022.07.006. Epub 2022 Jul 26.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This is the first known study that examines the association between common pedestrian crash types and passenger vehicle types.

METHOD

The analysis included single-vehicle, single-pedestrian crashes from two data sets: North Carolina state crash data and the Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS). We performed separate multinomial logistic regression analyses of major pedestrian crash types occurring at or near intersections and at nonintersections.

RESULTS

At or near intersections, minivans, large vans, pickups, and SUVs (collectively known as light truck vehicles, or LTVs) were more likely than cars to be involved in crossing-roadway-vehicle-turning-left crashes versus crossing-roadway-vehicle-not-turning crashes. LTVs were also more likely involved in fatal crossing-roadway-vehicle-turning-right crashes at or near intersections versus crossing-roadway-vehicle-not-turning crashes when compared with cars. At nonintersections, LTVs were associated with increased odds of walking-along-roadway crashes relative to crossing-roadway-vehicle-not-turning crashes when compared with cars.

CONCLUSIONS

LTVs were more likely to be involved in certain pedestrian crash types, implying a potentially problematic visibility of pedestrians near the front corners of these vehicles.

PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS

More research is needed to examine A-pillar blind zones by vehicle type. If it is found that LTVs have larger blind zones, automakers should consider ways to design the A-pillars of these vehicles to minimize blind zones while maintaining pillar strength. Doing this could improve pedestrian safety around these increasingly popular larger vehicles.

摘要

引言

这是首个研究行人碰撞类型与乘用车类型之间关联的研究。

方法

分析包括来自两个数据集的单辆车、单行人碰撞事故:北卡罗来纳州的事故数据和伤亡分析报告系统(FARS)。我们对在交叉口和非交叉口发生的主要行人碰撞类型进行了单独的多项逻辑回归分析。

结果

在交叉口附近,小型货车、大型货车、皮卡和 SUV(统称为轻型卡车,即 LTV)与汽车相比,更有可能卷入车辆转弯碰撞,而不是车辆不转弯碰撞。与汽车相比,LTV 还更有可能卷入交叉口致命的车辆右转碰撞,而不是车辆不转弯碰撞。在非交叉口,与汽车相比,LTV 与行人沿道路行走碰撞的几率增加有关,而不是与车辆不转弯碰撞。

结论

LTV 更有可能卷入某些行人碰撞类型,这表明这些车辆的前角附近行人的能见度可能存在问题。

实际应用

需要进一步研究按车辆类型划分的 A 柱盲区。如果发现 LTV 具有更大的盲区,汽车制造商应考虑设计这些车辆的 A 柱,以最小化盲区,同时保持柱强度。这样做可以提高这些越来越受欢迎的大型车辆周围的行人安全性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验