• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

494 例钝性肝损伤非手术治疗失败的预测因素:一项多中心回顾性研究。

Predictive factors of non-operative management failure in 494 blunt liver injuries: a multicenter retrospective study.

机构信息

Department of Digestive Surgery, Hôpital Nord, Aix-Marseille University, Chemin des Bourrely, 13915, Marseille Cedex 20, France.

Department of Studies and Research, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France.

出版信息

Updates Surg. 2022 Dec;74(6):1901-1913. doi: 10.1007/s13304-022-01367-6. Epub 2022 Aug 28.

DOI:10.1007/s13304-022-01367-6
PMID:36031640
Abstract

Non-operative management (NOM) has become the major treatment of blunt liver trauma (BLT) with a NOM failure rate of 3-15% due to liver-related complications. The aim of the study was to determine the predictive factors and a risk-stratified score of NOM failure. From 2013 to 2021, all patients with BLT in three trauma centers were included; clinical, biological, radiological and outcome data were retrospectively analyzed. Predictive factors and a risk-stratified score associated with NOM failure were identified. Four hundred and ninety-four patients with BLT were included. Among them, 80 (16.2%) had isolated BLT. Fifty-nine patients (11.9%) underwent emergent operative management (OM) on the day of admission and 435 (88.1%) had a NOM. NOM failure rate was 11.5%. Patients with a NOM failure more frequently had a hemoperitoneum (p < 0.001), liver bleeding (p < 0.001), blood transfusion (p < 0.001) and angioembolization (p < 0.001) compared to patient with a successful NOM. In multivariate analysis, the presence of hemoperitoneum (OR = 5.71; 95 CI [1.29-25.45]), angioembolization (OR = 8.73; 95 CI [2.04-38.44] and severe liver injury (AAST IV or V) (OR = 8.97; 95 CI [3.36-23.99]) were independent predictive factors of NOM failure. When these three factors were associated, NOM failure rate was 83.3%. The AAST grade, the presence of hemoperitoneum and the realization of liver angioembolization on the day of admission are three independent predictive factors of NOM failure. Our risk-score based on these three factors stratify the risk of NOM failure in BLT and could be used for a more appropriate level of medical survey adapted to each patient. Level of evidence: prospective observational cohort study, Level III.

摘要

非手术治疗(NOM)已成为钝性肝外伤(BLT)的主要治疗方法,但由于与肝脏相关的并发症,NOM 失败率为 3-15%。本研究旨在确定 NOM 失败的预测因素和风险分层评分。2013 年至 2021 年,纳入三家创伤中心的所有 BLT 患者;回顾性分析临床、生物学、影像学和结局数据。确定与 NOM 失败相关的预测因素和风险分层评分。共纳入 494 例 BLT 患者。其中,80 例(16.2%)为孤立性 BLT。59 例(11.9%)在入院当天接受紧急手术治疗(OM),435 例(88.1%)接受 NOM。NOM 失败率为 11.5%。与成功接受 NOM 的患者相比,NOM 失败的患者更常出现血腹(p<0.001)、肝出血(p<0.001)、输血(p<0.001)和血管栓塞(p<0.001)。多变量分析显示,血腹(OR=5.71;95%CI[1.29-25.45])、血管栓塞(OR=8.73;95%CI[2.04-38.44])和严重肝损伤(AAST IV 或 V)(OR=8.97;95%CI[3.36-23.99])是 NOM 失败的独立预测因素。当这三个因素相关时,NOM 失败率为 83.3%。入院时 AAST 分级、血腹和肝血管栓塞的存在是 NOM 失败的三个独立预测因素。我们基于这三个因素的风险评分可对 BLT 的 NOM 失败风险进行分层,并可用于对每个患者进行更合适的医疗调查水平。证据水平:前瞻性观察队列研究,III 级。

相似文献

1
Predictive factors of non-operative management failure in 494 blunt liver injuries: a multicenter retrospective study.494 例钝性肝损伤非手术治疗失败的预测因素:一项多中心回顾性研究。
Updates Surg. 2022 Dec;74(6):1901-1913. doi: 10.1007/s13304-022-01367-6. Epub 2022 Aug 28.
2
Non-operative management of isolated liver trauma.孤立性肝外伤的非手术治疗
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2014 Oct;13(5):545-50. doi: 10.1016/s1499-3872(14)60049-7.
3
Management and outcome of 308 cases of liver trauma in Bologna Trauma Center in 10 years.博洛尼亚创伤中心10年间308例肝外伤的治疗与结果
Ann Ital Chir. 2011 Sep-Oct;82(5):351-9.
4
Non-operative management of solid organ injuries in a middle-income country, how does it stack up?中低收入国家的实体器官损伤非手术治疗:情况如何?
Injury. 2022 Sep;53(9):2992-2997. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.03.036. Epub 2022 Mar 26.
5
Use of angioembolization, treatment modalities and mortality in association with blunt liver trauma in Germany - a data analysis of the TraumaRegister DGU®.德国钝性肝外伤中血管栓塞术的应用、治疗方式和死亡率 - 创伤登记处 DGU®的数据分析。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Dec 13;409(1):6. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-03196-6.
6
Non-operative management of blunt hepatic trauma: Does angioembolization have a major impact?钝性肝外伤的非手术治疗:血管栓塞术有重大影响吗?
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2015 Feb;41(1):81-6. doi: 10.1007/s00068-014-0431-6. Epub 2014 Aug 5.
7
Nonoperative treatment of multiple intra-abdominal solid organ injury after blunt abdominal trauma.钝性腹部创伤后腹腔内多个实性器官损伤的非手术治疗
J Trauma. 2008 Apr;64(4):943-8. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3180342023.
8
Splenic artery embolization improves outcomes and decreases the length of stay in hemodynamically stable blunt splenic injuries - A level 1 Australian Trauma centre experience.脾动脉栓塞术改善血流动力学稳定的钝性脾损伤的转归并缩短住院时间 - 澳大利亚 1 级创伤中心的经验。
Injury. 2022 May;53(5):1620-1626. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.12.043. Epub 2021 Dec 26.
9
Successful nonoperative management of the most severe blunt liver injuries: a multicenter study of the research consortium of new England centers for trauma.最严重钝性肝损伤的成功非手术治疗:新英格兰创伤中心研究联盟的多中心研究
Arch Surg. 2012 May;147(5):423-8. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2012.147.
10
Failures of splenic nonoperative management: is the glass half empty or half full?脾非手术治疗的失败:是杯子半空还是半满?
J Trauma. 2001 Feb;50(2):230-6. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200102000-00007.

引用本文的文献

1
High-grade liver injury: outcomes with a trauma surgery-liver surgery collaborative approach.重度肝损伤:创伤外科与肝脏外科协作方法的治疗结果
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2025 Jan 16;10(1):e001611. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2024-001611. eCollection 2025.
2
Future Perspectives on Radiomics in Acute Liver Injury and Liver Trauma.急性肝损伤和肝创伤中放射组学的未来展望
J Pers Med. 2024 May 27;14(6):572. doi: 10.3390/jpm14060572.
3
A 21-Year-Old Man with Previous History of Gastrectomy, Cholecystectomy, and Biliary Stenting with Failed Non-Operative Management of Blunt Trauma to the Liver Due to Traumatic Stent Perforation.

本文引用的文献

1
Value of repeat CT for nonoperative management of patients with blunt liver and spleen injury: a systematic review.重复CT在钝性肝脾损伤患者非手术治疗中的价值:一项系统评价
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2021 Dec;47(6):1753-1761. doi: 10.1007/s00068-020-01584-x. Epub 2021 Jan 23.
2
The Role of Angioembolization in Hepatic Trauma.血管栓塞在肝外伤中的作用。
Am Surg. 2021 Nov;87(11):1793-1801. doi: 10.1177/0003134820973729. Epub 2020 Dec 21.
3
Blunt liver trauma: effectiveness and evolution of non-operative management (NOM) in 145 consecutive cases.
一位 21 岁男性,既往有胃切除术、胆囊切除术和胆道支架置入史,因创伤性支架穿孔导致肝脏钝性外伤,经非手术治疗失败。
Am J Case Rep. 2023 Aug 31;24:e940984. doi: 10.12659/AJCR.940984.
钝性肝创伤:145 例连续病例非手术治疗(NOM)的效果和演变。
Updates Surg. 2020 Dec;72(4):1065-1071. doi: 10.1007/s13304-020-00861-z. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
4
Hepatic Pseudoaneurysm Incidence After Liver Trauma.肝外伤后假性动脉瘤的发生率。
J Surg Res. 2020 Dec;256:623-628. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.07.054. Epub 2020 Aug 15.
5
Relationship between the Injury Severity Score and the need for life-saving interventions in trauma patients in the UK.英国创伤患者损伤严重程度评分与生命拯救干预需求之间的关系。
Emerg Med J. 2020 Aug;37(8):502-507. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2019-209092. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
6
Validation of the revised 2018 AAST-OIS classification and the CT severity index for prediction of operative management and survival in patients with blunt spleen and liver injuries.验证修订后的 2018AAST-OIS 分类和 CT 严重指数在预测钝性脾和肝损伤患者手术治疗和生存中的作用。
Eur Radiol. 2020 Dec;30(12):6570-6581. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07061-8. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
7
Blunt and Penetrating Liver Trauma have Similar Outcomes in the Modern Era.钝性和穿透性肝外伤在现代具有相似的结局。
Scand J Surg. 2021 Jun;110(2):208-213. doi: 10.1177/1457496920921649. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
8
Reevaluation of Hepatic Angioembolization for Trauma in Stable Patients: Weighing the Risk.重新评估稳定型创伤患者肝动脉栓塞术的风险。
J Am Coll Surg. 2020 Jul;231(1):123-131.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.05.006. Epub 2020 May 15.
9
Management of Traumatic Liver Injury in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Nepal.尼泊尔一家三级护理医院中创伤性肝损伤的管理
J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2020 Jan 21;17(4):537-542. doi: 10.33314/jnhrc.v17i4.1958.
10
A systematic review of the safety and efficacy of non-operative management in patients with high grade liver injury.高等级肝损伤患者非手术治疗的安全性和疗效的系统评价。
Surgeon. 2020 Jun;18(3):165-177. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2019.07.001. Epub 2019 Aug 6.