• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Pro-Diversity Beliefs and the Diverse Person's Burden.支持多元化的信念与多元化人群的负担。
Synthese. 2022;200(5):357. doi: 10.1007/s11229-022-03785-w. Epub 2022 Aug 22.
2
Epistemic injustice in assessment of delusions.妄想评估中的认知不公正。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2015 Jun;21(3):479-85. doi: 10.1111/jep.12347. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
3
Tell me who you are and I tell you how you feel: expected emotional reactions to success and failure are influenced by knowledge about a person's personality.告诉我你是谁,我就告诉你你的感受如何:对成功和失败的预期情绪反应会受到对一个人人格了解的影响。
Int J Psychol. 2011 Aug;46(4):310-20. doi: 10.1080/00207594.2010.547583. Epub 2011 May 24.
4
Epistemic Injustice: A Philosophical Analysis of Women's Reproductive Health Care in a Somali-American Community.认知不公正:对索马里裔美国人社区女性生殖健康护理的哲学分析。
ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 2020 Jan/Mar;43(1):86-100. doi: 10.1097/ANS.0000000000000283.
5
(Why) do I think what you think? Epistemic social tuning and implicit prejudice.为什么我会认同你的观点?认知社会调适与隐性偏见。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 Dec;93(6):957-72. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.93.6.957.
6
What Differences Make a Difference? The Promise and Reality of Diverse Teams in Organizations.差异为何有差异?组织中多元化团队的承诺与现实。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2005 Oct;6(2):31-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-1006.2005.00022.x. Epub 2005 Oct 1.
7
When good for business is not good enough: Effects of pro-diversity beliefs and instrumentality of diversity on intergroup attitudes.当对商业有利还不够好时:亲多样性信仰和多样性工具性对群体间态度的影响。
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 1;15(6):e0234179. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234179. eCollection 2020.
8
Epistemic Injustice and Illness.认知不公与疾病
J Appl Philos. 2017 Feb;34(2):172-190. doi: 10.1111/japp.12172. Epub 2016 Feb 8.
9
Classifying a Person's Degree of Accessibility From Natural Body Language During Social Human-Robot Interactions.从社交人机交互中的自然体态语言对人的可及性程度进行分类。
IEEE Trans Cybern. 2017 Feb;47(2):524-538. doi: 10.1109/TCYB.2016.2520367. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
10
"The missing 'I' in drug research and the epistemic justice of disclosure".药物研究中的缺失“我”与披露的认识正义
Int J Drug Policy. 2021 Dec;98:103178. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103178. Epub 2021 Feb 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Psychological entitlement predicts noncompliance with the health guidelines of the COVID-19 pandemic.心理权利感预示着不遵守新冠疫情期间的健康指南。
Pers Individ Dif. 2021 Mar;171:110491. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2020.110491. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
2
The Psychology of Entrenched Privilege: High Socioeconomic Status Individuals From Affluent Backgrounds Are Uniquely High in Entitlement.固有权势心理学:高社会经济地位的富裕背景个体在权利感方面表现出独特的高度。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2021 Jan;47(1):70-88. doi: 10.1177/0146167220916633. Epub 2020 May 18.
3
Multiple diversity concepts and their ethical-epistemic implications.多种多样性概念及其伦理认知影响。
Eur J Philos Sci. 2018;8(3):761-780. doi: 10.1007/s13194-018-0209-5. Epub 2018 Jun 15.
4
What reduces sexual minority stress? A review of the intervention "toolkit".什么能减轻性少数群体的压力?对干预“工具包”的综述。
J Soc Issues. 2017 Sep;73(3):586-617. doi: 10.1111/josi.12233. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
5
Trait entitlement: A cognitive-personality source of vulnerability to psychological distress.特质权利感:心理困扰的认知-人格性脆弱源。
Psychol Bull. 2016 Nov;142(11):1204-1226. doi: 10.1037/bul0000063. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
6
Values, standpoints, and scientific/intellectual movements.价值观、立场以及科学/知识运动。
Stud Hist Philos Sci. 2016 Apr;56:11-9. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2015.10.008. Epub 2015 Nov 14.
7
High economic inequality leads higher-income individuals to be less generous.高度的经济不平等会导致高收入个体变得不那么慷慨。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Dec 29;112(52):15838-43. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1511536112. Epub 2015 Nov 23.
8
Positive Stereotypes Are Pervasive and Powerful.积极的刻板印象是普遍存在且强大的。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015 Jul;10(4):451-63. doi: 10.1177/1745691615588091.
9
Wealth and the inflated self: class, entitlement, and narcissism.财富与膨胀的自我:阶级、权利感和自恋。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2014 Jan;40(1):34-43. doi: 10.1177/0146167213501699. Epub 2013 Aug 20.
10
Victim entitlement to behave selfishly.受害者有自私行为的权利。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010 Feb;98(2):245-55. doi: 10.1037/a0017168.

支持多元化的信念与多元化人群的负担。

Pro-Diversity Beliefs and the Diverse Person's Burden.

作者信息

Steel Daniel, Paier Karoline

机构信息

W. Maurice Young Centre for Applied Ethics, University of British Columbia , Vancouver, Canada.

Department of Philosophy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

出版信息

Synthese. 2022;200(5):357. doi: 10.1007/s11229-022-03785-w. Epub 2022 Aug 22.

DOI:10.1007/s11229-022-03785-w
PMID:36032352
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9395773/
Abstract

Pro-diversity beliefs hold that greater diversity leads to better results in academia, business, politics and a variety of other contexts. This paper explores the possibility that pro-diversity beliefs can generate unfair expectations that marginalized people produce distinctive bonuses, a phenomenon we refer to as the "diverse person's burden". We suggest that a normic conception of diversity, according to which non-diversity entails social privilege, together with empirical research on psychological entitlement suggests an explanation of how the diverse person's burden can arise in many social settings. We also suggest structural and institutional remedies to address the diverse person's burden, as well as an individual virtue we label positional awareness.

摘要

支持多元化的信念认为,在学术界、商业、政治以及其他各种背景下,更大的多样性会带来更好的结果。本文探讨了一种可能性,即支持多元化的信念可能会产生不公平的期望,认为边缘化群体的人会带来独特的额外收益,我们将这种现象称为“多元化者的负担”。我们认为,一种关于多样性的规范概念,即非多样性意味着社会特权,再加上对心理权利的实证研究,为多元化者的负担如何在许多社会环境中产生提供了解释。我们还提出了应对多元化者负担的结构性和制度性补救措施,以及一种我们称之为位置意识的个人美德。