Suppr超能文献

新冠疫情对家庭金融资产配置的影响:一项中国人口研究。

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on household financial asset allocation: A China population study.

作者信息

Jia Hongwen, Fan Shugang, Xia Miao

机构信息

School of Economics, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.

School of Marxism, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 12;13:990610. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.990610. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic, the Chinese government implemented a "dynamic zero" epidemic prevention policy, which led to an increase in the likelihood of business shutdowns, increased uncertainty about people's income, and changes in people's psychological expectations, which in turn influenced their behavioral choices. This study aims to understand the impact of COVID-19 and other major public health emergencies on household financial asset allocation. To do so, we conducted an online survey of 712 people in China to measure household financial asset allocation behavior during three different time periods: pre-pandemic, mid-pandemic, and post-pandemic. At the same time, we analyzed the impact of sociodemographic characteristics on risk attitudes and the differences in household asset allocation decisions at different pre-pandemic time points among people with different risk attitudes. The results show that household financial asset allocation changed significantly before, during, and after the pandemic, and residents' precautionary savings increased. In addition, gender, education level, occupation, and annual income have significant effects on risk preferences. The pandemic leads to increased uncertainty in economic and social development, people's psychological expectations of economic development play an important role in household financial asset allocation.

摘要

在新冠疫情期间,中国政府实施了“动态清零”的防疫政策,这导致企业停工可能性增加、人们收入的不确定性增大以及心理预期发生变化,进而影响了他们的行为选择。本研究旨在了解新冠疫情及其他重大突发公共卫生事件对家庭金融资产配置的影响。为此,我们对中国712人进行了在线调查,以衡量疫情前、疫情中期和疫情后三个不同时间段的家庭金融资产配置行为。同时,我们分析了社会人口特征对风险态度的影响以及不同风险态度的人群在疫情前不同时间点家庭资产配置决策的差异。结果表明,疫情前、疫情期间和疫情后家庭金融资产配置发生了显著变化,居民预防性储蓄增加。此外,性别、教育水平、职业和年收入对风险偏好有显著影响。疫情导致经济社会发展的不确定性增加,人们对经济发展的心理预期在家庭金融资产配置中发挥着重要作用。

相似文献

1
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on household financial asset allocation: A China population study.
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 12;13:990610. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.990610. eCollection 2022.
2
Medical insurance, health risks, and household financial asset allocation: evidence from China household finance survey.
Front Public Health. 2023 Dec 22;11:1268470. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1268470. eCollection 2023.
3
Health shock, medical insurance and financial asset allocation: evidence from CHFS in China.
Health Econ Rev. 2022 Oct 21;12(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s13561-022-00400-z.
4
Comparative analysis of the influence of Chinese urban and rural family cultures on household financial asset allocation.
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 8;14:1119258. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1119258. eCollection 2023.
5
An Empirical Study on the Influence of the Basic Medical Insurance for Urban and Rural Residents on Family Financial Asset Allocation.
Front Public Health. 2021 Aug 12;9:725608. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.725608. eCollection 2021.
6
Research on the impact and heterogeneity of housing on the allocation of financial assets of households: Evidence from China.
Heliyon. 2024 Jul 19;10(14):e34901. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34901. eCollection 2024 Jul 30.
7
Digital inclusive finance and asset allocation of Chinese residents: Evidence from the China Household Finance Survey.
PLoS One. 2022 May 5;17(5):e0267055. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267055. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

2
Statistical learning models to measure the impact of COVID-19 on financial fragility.
Front Artif Intell. 2024 May 15;7:1358812. doi: 10.3389/frai.2024.1358812. eCollection 2024.
3
Comparative analysis of the influence of Chinese urban and rural family cultures on household financial asset allocation.
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 8;14:1119258. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1119258. eCollection 2023.
4
The impacts of non-farming income on rural household energy choices: Empirical evidence from China.
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 21;13:1044362. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1044362. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
The dynamic evolution mechanism of public health risk perception and the choice of policy tools in the post-epidemic era: Evidence from China.
Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2022 Jul;77:103056. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103056. Epub 2022 May 20.
2
Household investment diversification amid Covid-19 pandemic: Evidence from Chinese investors.
Financ Res Lett. 2022 Jun;47:102820. doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2022.102820. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
5
COVID-19 doesn't need lockdowns to destroy jobs: The effect of local outbreaks in Korea.
Labour Econ. 2021 Jun;70:101993. doi: 10.1016/j.labeco.2021.101993. Epub 2021 Apr 30.
6
7
International trade resilience and the Covid-19 pandemic.
J Bus Res. 2022 Jan;138:77-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.08.064. Epub 2021 Sep 12.
8
Psychological Reactance to Mobility Restrictions Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Japanese Population Study.
Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 11;12:655022. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.655022. eCollection 2021.
9
Impact of the Coronavirus Pandemic (COVID-19) Lockdown on Mental Health and Well-Being in the United Arab Emirates.
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Mar 16;12:633230. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.633230. eCollection 2021.
10
The impact of COVID-19 on industry-related characteristics and risk contagion.
Financ Res Lett. 2021 Mar;39:101931. doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2021.101931. Epub 2021 Jan 12.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验