• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国城乡家庭文化对家庭金融资产配置影响的比较分析

Comparative analysis of the influence of Chinese urban and rural family cultures on household financial asset allocation.

作者信息

Li Zhisheng, Mirko Cucci, D'Agostino Maria Teresa, Jin Jiyang

机构信息

School of Business, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, China.

Department of Computer Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 8;14:1119258. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1119258. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1119258
PMID:36844357
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9945532/
Abstract

Despite the national strategic priority to achieve common prosperity, there still exist prominent discrepancies in financial asset allocation between Chinese urban and rural families, which requires a deeper, more comprehensive investigation. To fill this gap, the present research adopted a cultural perspective to investigate relevant issues by addressing the cognitive differences of residents between urban and rural families. Under the analytical framework of Hofstede's cultural values, this paper discusses the cognitive differences between urban and rural families in terms of financial asset allocation in the cultural dimensions of collectivism, individualism and uncertainty avoidance; hypotheses are accordingly developed. In terms of research methods, the data of the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS) were used in the probit model to investigate the influence of urban and rural family cultural differences on household financial asset allocation. The results of this paper are as follows: (1) family cultural values have a positive impact on family financial asset allocation; (2) knowledge acquisition plays an intermediary role in family cultural values and family financial asset allocation; (3) and for rural families with high collectivism and uncertainty avoidance, the mediating effect is more prominent. This paper provides a new perspective for exploring the possibility of household asset allocation from the perspective of cultural psychology. The contribution of this paper have theoretical and practical reference significance to narrow the wealth gap between urban and rural areas and achieve common prosperity.

摘要

尽管实现共同富裕是国家战略重点,但中国城乡家庭在金融资产配置方面仍存在显著差异,这需要进行更深入、更全面的调查。为填补这一空白,本研究采用文化视角,通过探讨城乡家庭居民的认知差异来研究相关问题。在霍夫斯泰德文化价值观的分析框架下,本文从集体主义、个人主义和不确定性规避等文化维度,探讨城乡家庭在金融资产配置方面的认知差异,并据此提出假设。在研究方法上,利用中国家庭追踪调查(CFPS)的数据,通过概率模型研究城乡家庭文化差异对家庭金融资产配置的影响。本文的研究结果如下:(1)家庭文化价值观对家庭金融资产配置具有正向影响;(2)知识获取在家庭文化价值观与家庭金融资产配置之间起中介作用;(3)对于集体主义和不确定性规避程度较高的农村家庭,中介效应更为显著。本文为从文化心理学角度探索家庭资产配置可能性提供了新视角。本文的研究成果对于缩小城乡财富差距、实现共同富裕具有理论和实践参考意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b5a/9945532/3c0ab47f839d/fpsyg-14-1119258-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b5a/9945532/3c0ab47f839d/fpsyg-14-1119258-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b5a/9945532/3c0ab47f839d/fpsyg-14-1119258-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative analysis of the influence of Chinese urban and rural family cultures on household financial asset allocation.中国城乡家庭文化对家庭金融资产配置影响的比较分析
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 8;14:1119258. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1119258. eCollection 2023.
2
An Empirical Study on the Influence of the Basic Medical Insurance for Urban and Rural Residents on Family Financial Asset Allocation.城乡居民基本医疗保险对家庭金融资产配置影响的实证研究。
Front Public Health. 2021 Aug 12;9:725608. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.725608. eCollection 2021.
3
Health shock, medical insurance and financial asset allocation: evidence from CHFS in China.健康冲击、医疗保险与金融资产配置:来自中国家庭金融调查(CHFS)的证据
Health Econ Rev. 2022 Oct 21;12(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s13561-022-00400-z.
4
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on household financial asset allocation: A China population study.新冠疫情对家庭金融资产配置的影响:一项中国人口研究。
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 12;13:990610. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.990610. eCollection 2022.
5
Research on the impact and heterogeneity of housing on the allocation of financial assets of households: Evidence from China.住房对家庭金融资产配置的影响及异质性研究:来自中国的证据。
Heliyon. 2024 Jul 19;10(14):e34901. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34901. eCollection 2024 Jul 30.
6
Medical insurance, health risks, and household financial asset allocation: evidence from China household finance survey.医疗保险、健康风险与家庭金融资产配置:来自中国家庭金融调查的证据。
Front Public Health. 2023 Dec 22;11:1268470. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1268470. eCollection 2023.
7
Medical Students' and Trainees' Country-By-Gender Profiles: Hofstede's Cultural Dimensions Across Sixteen Diverse Countries.医学生和实习生的国别性别概况:十六个不同国家的霍夫斯泰德文化维度
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Feb 8;8:746288. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.746288. eCollection 2021.
8
The Relationship Between Hofstede's Cultural Dimensions, Schwartz's Cultural Values, and Obesity.霍夫斯泰德文化维度、施瓦茨文化价值观与肥胖之间的关系
Psychol Rep. 2019 Jun;122(3):968-987. doi: 10.1177/0033294118777965. Epub 2018 May 22.
9
Digital inclusive finance and asset allocation of Chinese residents: Evidence from the China Household Finance Survey.数字包容性金融与中国居民资产配置——来自中国家庭金融调查的证据。
PLoS One. 2022 May 5;17(5):e0267055. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267055. eCollection 2022.
10
Cultured Construction: Global Evidence of the Impact of National Values on Piped-to-Premises Water Infrastructure Development.文化构建:国家价值观对管道直饮水基础设施发展影响的全球证据
Environ Sci Technol. 2016 Jul 19;50(14):7723-31. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.6b01107. Epub 2016 Jun 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Understanding the paradox between tragedies of the commons and the anticommons: From a cognitive psychology perspective.从认知心理学角度理解公地悲剧与反公地悲剧之间的悖论
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 20;13:998642. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.998642. eCollection 2022.
2
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on household financial asset allocation: A China population study.新冠疫情对家庭金融资产配置的影响:一项中国人口研究。
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 12;13:990610. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.990610. eCollection 2022.
3
Relationship Between Teachers' Teaching Modes and Students' Temperament and Learning Motivation in Confucian Culture During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
新冠疫情期间儒家文化背景下教师教学模式与学生气质及学习动机的关系
Front Psychol. 2022 May 26;13:865445. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.865445. eCollection 2022.
4
Cultural Scripts of Traumatic Stress: Outline, Illustrations, and Research Opportunities.创伤应激的文化脚本:概述、例证及研究机遇
Front Psychol. 2019 Nov 15;10:2528. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02528. eCollection 2019.
5
Dimensions and Dynamics of National Culture: Synthesizing Hofstede With Inglehart.国家文化的维度与动态:将霍夫斯泰德与英格尔哈特的理论进行综合
J Cross Cult Psychol. 2018 Nov;49(10):1469-1505. doi: 10.1177/0022022118798505. Epub 2018 Oct 2.
6
Optimal Financial Knowledge and Wealth Inequality.最优金融知识与财富不平等。
J Polit Econ. 2017 Apr;125(2):431-477. doi: 10.1086/690950. Epub 2017 Mar 7.
7
Culture shapes whether the pursuit of happiness predicts higher or lower well-being.文化决定了对幸福的追求是预示着更高还是更低的幸福感。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2015 Dec;144(6):1053-62. doi: 10.1037/xge0000108. Epub 2015 Sep 7.
8
Finance is good for the poor but it depends where you live.金融对穷人有益,但这取决于你生活在哪里。
J Bank Financ. 2013 May;37(5):1451-1459. doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2012.04.022.
9
Variations in risk attitude across race, gender, and education.不同种族、性别和教育程度之间的风险态度差异。
Med Decis Making. 2003 Nov-Dec;23(6):511-7. doi: 10.1177/0272989X03258431.