Telg Sean, Dubinova Anna, Lucas Andre
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Tinbergen Institute, Netherlands.
J Bank Financ. 2023 Feb;147:106638. doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2022.106638. Epub 2022 Aug 22.
We investigate rating and default risk dynamics over the covid-19 crisis from a credit risk modeling perspective. We find that growth dynamics remain a stable and sufficient predictor of credit risk incidence over the pandemic period, despite its large, short-lived swings due to government intervention and lockdown. Unobserved component models as used in the recent credit risk literature appear mainly helpful for explaining the high-default wave in the early 2000s, but less so for default prediction above and beyond growth dynamics during the 2008 financial crisis or the early 2020 covid default peak. Government support variables do not reduce the impact of either growth proxies or unobserved components. Correlations between government support and credit risk are different, however, during the financial and the covid crisis. Using the empirical models in this paper as credit risk management tools, we show that growth factors also suffice to predict credit risk quantiles out-of-sample during covid times.
我们从信用风险建模的角度研究了新冠疫情危机期间的评级和违约风险动态。我们发现,尽管由于政府干预和封锁导致增长动态出现大幅、短期波动,但在疫情期间,增长动态仍然是信用风险发生率的稳定且充分的预测指标。近期信用风险文献中使用的未观测成分模型似乎主要有助于解释21世纪初的高违约浪潮,但对于2008年金融危机或2020年初新冠违约高峰期间超出增长动态的违约预测作用较小。政府支持变量并不会降低增长代理变量或未观测成分的影响。然而,在金融和新冠危机期间,政府支持与信用风险之间的相关性有所不同。使用本文中的实证模型作为信用风险管理工具,我们表明增长因素也足以预测新冠疫情期间样本外的信用风险分位数。