• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社区-学术健康合作项目中的有效领导力:一项归纳性定性研究。

Effective leaders(hip) in community-academic health partnership projects: An inductive, qualitative study.

作者信息

Chak Choiwai Maggie, Carminati Lara

机构信息

Science-to-Business Marketing Research Centre, FH Münster University of Applied Sciences, Münster, Germany.

Faculty of Behavioural, Management and Social Sciences, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2022 Aug 12;10:941242. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.941242. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2022.941242
PMID:36033818
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9411517/
Abstract

To deepen our understanding of how project leaders can lead effectively in different community-academic health partnerships (CAHPs), we conducted an inductive, qualitative study through semi-structured interviews ( = 32) and analyzed the data with Grounded Theory approaches. By presenting a process model illustrating the cycle of effective leaders(hip) in CAHP projects, we contribute to the literature on CAHP, leadership development, and complexity leadership theory in three ways. Firstly, the model depicts the strategies enabling leaders to navigate typical project challenges and perform leadership tasks effectively. Secondly, we distill four beneficial qualities (i.e., adopting a proactive attitude, having an open and adaptive mindset, relying on peer learning and support, and emphasizing self-growth and reflexivity) which CAHP project leaders require to develop themselves into effective leaders. Thirdly, we illustrate leaders' dynamic developmental logics and processes of effective leadership and their contributions to better project functioning in diverse CAHPs.

摘要

为了深化我们对项目领导者如何在不同的社区-学术健康伙伴关系(CAHPs)中有效领导的理解,我们通过半结构化访谈(n = 32)进行了一项归纳性定性研究,并用扎根理论方法分析了数据。通过提出一个过程模型,阐明CAHP项目中有效领导(力)的循环,我们从三个方面为关于CAHP、领导力发展和复杂性领导理论的文献做出了贡献。首先,该模型描述了使领导者能够应对典型项目挑战并有效执行领导任务的策略。其次,我们提炼出CAHP项目领导者发展成为有效领导者所需的四种有益品质(即采取积极主动的态度、拥有开放和适应性的思维模式、依靠同伴学习和支持以及强调自我成长和反思)。第三,我们阐述了领导者有效领导的动态发展逻辑和过程,以及他们对不同CAHPs中更好的项目运作所做的贡献。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2bc/9411517/c56726ece92f/fpubh-10-941242-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2bc/9411517/c56726ece92f/fpubh-10-941242-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2bc/9411517/c56726ece92f/fpubh-10-941242-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Effective leaders(hip) in community-academic health partnership projects: An inductive, qualitative study.社区-学术健康合作项目中的有效领导力:一项归纳性定性研究。
Front Public Health. 2022 Aug 12;10:941242. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.941242. eCollection 2022.
2
Pathways for Strengthening Lived Experience Leadership for Transformative Systems Change: Reflections on Research and Collective Change Strategies.强化生活体验领导力以实现变革性系统变革的途径:对研究和集体变革策略的反思。
Health Expect. 2024 Oct;27(5):e70048. doi: 10.1111/hex.70048.
3
Disease management projects and the Chronic Care Model in action: baseline qualitative research.疾病管理项目和慢性病照护模式的实践:基线定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 May 11;12:114. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-114.
4
Interplay of clear, demanding, and important goals on project performance in community-academic health partnerships.在社区-学术健康伙伴关系中,明确、苛刻且重要的目标对项目绩效的相互作用。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2022;47(3):208-217. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000320. Epub 2021 Jul 26.
5
Protected Time for Research Among Academic Hospitalists: a Qualitative Study of Hospitalist Group Leaders.论学术型主治医生的研究保护时间:对主治医生小组组长的定性研究
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Apr;39(5):723-730. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08525-5. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
6
Contemporary leadership in healthcare organizations: fragmented or concurrent leadership.当代医疗保健组织的领导力:分散式或并行式领导力。
J Health Organ Manag. 2009;23(4):411-28. doi: 10.1108/14777260910979308.
7
Leadership in complex networks: the importance of network position and strategic action in a translational cancer research network.复杂网络中的领导力:在转化癌症研究网络中网络位置和战略行动的重要性。
Implement Sci. 2013 Oct 11;8:122. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-122.
8
Development of a Culturally Specific Leadership Curriculum through Community-Based Participatory Research and Popular Education.通过基于社区的参与性研究和大众教育开发特定文化背景下的领导力课程。
Asian Pac Isl Nurs J. 2020;5(2):73-88. doi: 10.31372/20200502.1086.
9
Purpose Formulation, Coalition Building, and Evidence Use in Public-Academic Partnerships: Web-Based Survey Study.公共-学术伙伴关系中的目标制定、联盟建设与证据应用:基于网络的调查研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Jan 5;9(1):e29288. doi: 10.2196/29288.
10
Leadership assumptions on implementation of patient involvement methods.领导对实施患者参与方法的假设。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 May 26;21(1):505. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06497-y.

本文引用的文献

1
A Roadmap to Inform the Implementation of Evidence-Based Collaborative Care Interventions in Communities: Insights From the Michigan Mental Health Integration Partnership.制定实施社区循证协作式照护干预措施的路线图:密歇根心理健康整合伙伴关系的相关见解。
Front Public Health. 2021 May 24;9:655999. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.655999. eCollection 2021.
2
Scales of Practices and Outcomes for Community-Engaged Research.社区参与式研究的实践和结果量表。
Am J Community Psychol. 2021 Jun;67(3-4):256-270. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12503. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
3
Exploring the Dynamics of a Research Partnership in a Co-Operative Inquiry: A Qualitative Study.
合作探究中研究伙伴关系的动态研究:定性研究。
Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2021 Sep;42(9):818-826. doi: 10.1080/01612840.2021.1875275. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
4
Advancing Community-Engaged Research through Partnership Development: Overcoming Challenges Voiced by Community-Academic Partners.通过伙伴关系发展推进社区参与式研究:克服社区-学术伙伴提出的挑战。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2020;14(3):315-326. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2020.0037.
5
Systems leadership in practice: thematic insights from three public health case studies.系统领导力实践:来自三个公共卫生案例研究的主题见解。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Nov 17;20(1):1735. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09641-1.
6
Network-Based Delivery and Sustainment of Evidence-Based Prevention in Community-Clinical Partnerships Addressing Health Equity: A Qualitative Exploration.基于网络的社区-临床伙伴关系中基于证据的预防的提供和维持,以解决健康公平问题:定性探索。
Front Public Health. 2020 Jun 26;8:213. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00213. eCollection 2020.
7
Cultivating Value Co-Creation in Health System Research Comment on "Experience of Health Leadership in Partnering with University-Based Researchers in Canada - A Call to Re-imagine Research".培养卫生系统研究中的价值共创 评“加拿大健康领导力经验:与大学研究人员合作——重新构想研究的呼吁”。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2021 Mar 1;10(3):165-167. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.35.
8
Complexity Leadership: Constructing 21st-Century Health Care.复杂性领导力:构建21世纪的医疗保健体系
Nurs Adm Q. 2020 Apr/Jun;44(2):92-100. doi: 10.1097/NAQ.0000000000000405.
9
Experience of Health Leadership in Partnering With University-Based Researchers in Canada - A Call to "Re-imagine" Research.在加拿大与大学研究人员合作方面的健康领导力经验——呼吁“重新构想”研究。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2019 Dec 1;8(12):684-699. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2019.66.
10
Contemporary issues in north-south health research partnerships: perspectives of health research stakeholders in Zambia.当代南北健康研究伙伴关系中的问题:赞比亚卫生研究利益攸关方的观点。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Jan 15;17(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0409-7.