Department of General Surgery, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Aug 11;13:975468. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.975468. eCollection 2022.
Self-management of blood glucose levels to avoid hypoglycemia is vital for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The association between specific metrics of glycemic variability (glycosylated hemoglobin A1c [HbA1c] and fasting plasma glucose [FPG]) and severe hypoglycemia has not been fully studied in patients with T2DM.
In this analysis, patients with established T2DM with a high risk of cardiovascular disease were included in the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) study. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to investigate the relationship between glycemic variability and hypoglycemia requiring medical assistance (HMA) and hypoglycemia requiring any third-party assistance (HAA). The prognostic value of HbA1c/FPG variability for our predefined outcomes was compared using Harrell's C method.
After adjusting for confounders, each increase in HbA1c variability of 1 standard deviation (SD) indicated a higher risk of HAA (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.10; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03-1.16; P < 0.01) and HMA events (HR: 1.11; 95% CI: 1.03-1.20; P < 0.01). Meanwhile, each increase in FPG variability of 1 SD increased the risk of HAA (HR: 1.40; 95% CI: 1.31-1.49; P < 0.01) and HMA events (HR: 1.46; 95% CI: 1.35-1.57; P < 0.01). Meanwhile, models, including FPG variability, had better prognostic value for our predefined outcomes than HbA1c variability (P < 0.01).
Increased visit-to-visit variability in HbA1c and fasting glycemia is associated with a greater risk of severe hypoglycemic events in T2DM patients. FPG variability is a more sensitive indicator than HbA1c variability.
http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00000620.
对于 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)患者来说,自我管理血糖水平以避免低血糖至关重要。糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)和空腹血浆葡萄糖(FPG)等血糖变异性特定指标与 T2DM 患者严重低血糖之间的关系尚未得到充分研究。
在这项分析中,纳入了心血管疾病风险较高的已确诊 T2DM 患者,他们参与了行动控制心血管风险糖尿病(ACCORD)研究。使用 Cox 比例风险模型研究了血糖变异性与需要医疗协助的低血糖(HMA)和需要任何第三方协助的低血糖(HAA)之间的关系。使用 Harrell 的 C 方法比较了 HbA1c/FPG 变异性对我们预设结局的预测价值。
在校正混杂因素后,HbA1c 变异性每增加 1 个标准差(SD),HAA(风险比 [HR]:1.10;95%置信区间 [CI]:1.03-1.16;P < 0.01)和 HMA 事件(HR:1.11;95% CI:1.03-1.20;P < 0.01)的风险就会增加。同时,FPG 变异性每增加 1 SD,HAA(HR:1.40;95% CI:1.31-1.49;P < 0.01)和 HMA 事件(HR:1.46;95% CI:1.35-1.57;P < 0.01)的风险也会增加。同时,包括 FPG 变异性在内的模型对我们预设结局的预测价值优于 HbA1c 变异性(P < 0.01)。
HbA1c 和空腹血糖的访视间变异性增加与 T2DM 患者严重低血糖事件的风险增加相关。FPG 变异性比 HbA1c 变异性更敏感。