Do Bridgette, Kirkland Chelsey, Besenyi Gina M, Carissa Smock Mph, Lanza Kevin
Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90032, USA.
Center for Public Health Systems, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Prev Med Rep. 2022 Oct;29:101959. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.101959. Epub 2022 Aug 22.
The purpose of the systematic review was to identify, evaluate, and synthesize evidence from available published literature examining the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on youth physical activity (PA). A systematic review of the literature was conducted for years 2020-2021. Published articles were searched in eight databases. Inclusion criteria included: availability of full-text, written in English language, and reported quantitative or qualitative results of original or secondary data on PA and COVID-19 related factors among youth (ages 5-17 years). A standard quality assessment tool assessed risk of bias and quality of included articles. The search retrieved 2,899 articles with 51 articles ultimately meeting inclusion criteria. The majority of articles (65 %) investigated change in PA from before to during the pandemic. Most evidence indicated an overall decrease in youth PA levels during the pandemic with differences observed among sub-populations (e.g., age, sex or gender), type, and location. Findings suggest pandemic-related closures hindered PA participation due to a high reliance on school- and sport-based PA. Programmatic strategies (e.g., activity breaks, active curriculum, free online activities/lessons) should include aligning intervention measures and geared towards evolving and ongoing PA promotion based on the latest findings.
本系统评价的目的是识别、评估和综合已发表文献中的证据，以研究2019冠状病毒病（COVID-19）大流行对青少年身体活动（PA）的影响。对2020年至2021年的文献进行了系统评价。在八个数据库中搜索已发表的文章。纳入标准包括：提供全文、用英语撰写、报告了关于青少年（5至17岁）身体活动和COVID-19相关因素的原始或二手数据的定量或定性结果。使用标准质量评估工具评估纳入文章的偏倚风险和质量。搜索共检索到2899篇文章，最终有51篇文章符合纳入标准。大多数文章（65%）调查了大流行前至大流行期间身体活动的变化。大多数证据表明，大流行期间青少年的身体活动水平总体下降，不同亚人群（如年龄、性别）、类型和地点存在差异。研究结果表明，由于高度依赖学校和体育活动，与大流行相关的关闭措施阻碍了身体活动的参与。方案策略（如活动休息、积极课程、免费在线活动/课程）应包括调整干预措施，并根据最新研究结果，致力于不断发展和持续的身体活动促进工作。
