Atria Jorge
Department of Sociology, Universidad Diego Portales, Santiago de Chile, Chile.
Soc Justice Res. 2022;35(4):490-510. doi: 10.1007/s11211-022-00395-2. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
Inheritance represents a conflict between the individual and society. On one hand, the intergenerational transmission of resources favors the reproduction of privilege. On the other hand, contemporary individualization processes prioritize individual achievement. This paper addresses this conflict through a sociological approach by analyzing perceptions of inheritance taxation based on 32 in-depth interviews with members of the economic elite in Chile. Findings show that the principle of individual freedom in decisions regarding resource use prevails over the redistributive function that controls inheritance and favors personal attainment. In addition, a negative view of inheritance prevails, which is sustained by three major repertoires of evaluation emphasizing its inefficiency, ineffectiveness, economic inconvenience, and lack of foundation, as its purpose or utility is unknown. This last argument is surprising because it does not reject this tax for its design or application; rather, it confronts some crucial ideas with which it is usually linked, namely opportunity levelling at the beginning of a new generation and redistribution of privilege.
遗产继承体现了个人与社会之间的冲突。一方面,资源的代际传递有利于特权的延续。另一方面,当代个体化进程将个人成就置于优先地位。本文通过社会学方法,基于对智利经济精英群体的32次深度访谈,分析对遗产税的看法,来探讨这一冲突。研究结果表明,在资源使用决策中,个人自由原则凌驾于控制遗产继承并有利于个人成就的再分配功能之上。此外,人们对遗产继承普遍持负面看法,这种看法由三种主要评价方式支撑,这些评价强调遗产继承的低效、无效、经济上的不便以及缺乏依据,因为其目的或效用不明。最后这一观点令人惊讶,因为它并非因其设计或应用而拒绝这种税收;相反,它质疑了一些通常与之相关的关键理念,即新一代起点的机会均等和特权的再分配。