Anderegg Loïc, Doyle John, Gardel Margaret L, Gupta Amit, Hallas Christian, Lensky Yuri, Love Nancy G, Lucas Bronwyn A, Mazenc Edward, Meisenhelder Cole, Pillarisetti Ajay, Ranard Daniel, Squires Allison H, Vechakul Jessica, Vilas Nathaniel B, Williams Stuart, Wilson Daniel, Chen Tyler N
Department of Physics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Harvard/MIT Center for Ultracold Atoms, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Appl Biosaf. 2021 Jun 1;26(2):80-89. doi: 10.1089/apb.20.0053. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused a global shortage of single-use N95 filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs). A combination of heat and humidity is a promising method for N95 FFR decontamination in crisis-capacity conditions; however, an understanding of its effect on viral inactivation and N95 respirator function is crucial to achieving effective decontamination. We reviewed the scientific literature on heat-based methods for decontamination of N95 FFRs contaminated with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and viral analogues. We identified key parameters for SARS-CoV-2 bioburden reduction while preserving N95 fit and filtration, as well as methods that are likely ineffective. Viral inactivation by humid heat is highly sensitive to temperature, humidity, duration of exposure, and the local microenvironment (e.g., dried saliva). A process that achieves temperatures of 70-85°C and relative humidity >50% for at least 30 min is likely to inactivate SARS-CoV-2 (>3-log reduction) on N95 respirators while maintaining fit and filtration efficiency for three to five cycles. Dry heat is significantly less effective. Microwave-generated steam is another promising approach, although less studied, whereas 121°C autoclave treatments may damage some N95 FFRs. Humid heat will not inactivate all microorganisms, so reprocessed N95 respirators should be reused only by the original user. Effective bioburden reduction on N95 FFRs during the COVID-19 pandemic requires inactivation of SARS-CoV-2 and preservation of N95 fit and filtration. The literature suggests that humid heat protocols can achieve effective bioburden reduction. Proper industrial hygiene, biosafety controls, and clear protocols are required to reduce the risks of N95 reprocessing and reuse.
2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行导致全球一次性N95过滤式面罩呼吸器(FFR)短缺。在危机应对能力条件下,热和湿度相结合是对N95 FFR进行消毒的一种有前景的方法;然而,了解其对病毒灭活和N95呼吸器功能的影响对于实现有效消毒至关重要。我们回顾了关于用热方法对受严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)及其病毒类似物污染的N95 FFR进行消毒的科学文献。我们确定了在保持N95贴合性和过滤性的同时降低SARS-CoV-2生物负荷的关键参数,以及可能无效的方法。湿热对病毒的灭活对温度、湿度、暴露持续时间和局部微环境(如干燥的唾液)高度敏感。一个能使温度达到70 - 85°C且相对湿度>50%至少持续30分钟的过程可能会使N95呼吸器上的SARS-CoV-2失活(>3个对数级减少),同时在三到五个循环内保持贴合性和过滤效率。干热的效果明显较差。微波产生的蒸汽是另一种有前景的方法,尽管研究较少,而121°C的高压灭菌处理可能会损坏一些N95 FFR。湿热不会使所有微生物失活,因此经重新处理的N95呼吸器应仅由原使用者重复使用。在COVID-19大流行期间,有效降低N95 FFR上的生物负荷需要使SARS-CoV-2失活并保持N95的贴合性和过滤性。文献表明,湿热方案可以有效降低生物负荷。需要适当的工业卫生、生物安全控制和明确的方案来降低N95再处理和重复使用的风险。