Suppr超能文献

针对新冠疫情的非药物干预策略的差异。

Differences in NPI strategies against COVID-19.

作者信息

Redlin Margarete

机构信息

Department of Economics, Paderborn University, Warburger Str. 100, 33098 Paderborn, Germany.

出版信息

J Regul Econ. 2022;62(1-3):1-23. doi: 10.1007/s11149-022-09452-9. Epub 2022 Aug 22.

Abstract

Non-pharmaceutical interventions are an effective strategy to prevent and control COVID-19 transmission in the community. However, the timing and stringency to which these measures have been implemented varied between countries and regions. The differences in stringency can only to a limited extent be explained by the number of infections and the prevailing vaccination strategies. Our study aims to shed more light on the lockdown strategies and to identify the determinants underlying the differences between countries on regional, economic, institutional, and political level. Based on daily panel data for 173 countries and the period from January 2020 to October 2021 we find significant regional differences in lockdown strategies. Further, more prosperous countries implemented milder restrictions but responded more quickly, while poorer countries introduced more stringent measures but had a longer response time. Finally, democratic regimes and stronger manifested institutions alleviated and slowed down the introduction of lockdown measures.

摘要

非药物干预措施是预防和控制新冠病毒在社区传播的有效策略。然而,这些措施实施的时机和严格程度在不同国家和地区有所不同。严格程度的差异仅在有限程度上可由感染数量和现行疫苗接种策略来解释。我们的研究旨在更深入地了解封锁策略,并确定国家之间在地区、经济、制度和政治层面存在差异的潜在决定因素。基于173个国家2020年1月至2021年10月期间的每日面板数据,我们发现封锁策略存在显著的地区差异。此外,较富裕的国家实施的限制措施较为宽松,但响应速度更快,而较贫穷的国家则采取了更严格的措施,但响应时间更长。最后,民主政权和表现更强的制度减轻并减缓了封锁措施的实施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/048b/9395806/8e849c89ca02/11149_2022_9452_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验