Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University Federico II of Naples, Italy (G.G., G.E.).
Cardiology Department, Alto Vicentino Hospital, Santorso, Italy (D.G.).
Circulation. 2022 Nov;146(18):1329-1343. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.061527. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
In some randomized clinical trials, transradial access (TRA) compared with transfemoral access (TFA) was associated with lower mortality in patients with coronary artery disease undergoing invasive management. We analyzed the effects of TRA versus TFA across multicenter randomized clinical trials and whether these associations are modified by patient or procedural characteristics.
We performed an individual patient data meta-analysis of multicenter randomized clinical trials comparing TRA with TFA among patients undergoing coronary angiography with or without percutaneous coronary intervention. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality and the co-primary outcome was major bleeding at 30 days. The primary analysis was conducted by 1-stage mixed-effects models on the basis of the intention-to-treat cohort. The effect of access site on mortality and major bleeding was assessed further by multivariable analysis. The relationship among access site, bleeding, and mortality was investigated by natural effect model mediation analysis with multivariable adjustment.
A total of 21 600 patients (10 775 TRA, 10 825 TFA) from 7 randomized clinical trials were included. The median age was 63.9 years, 31.9% were women, 95% presented with acute coronary syndrome, and 75.2% underwent percutaneous coronary intervention. All-cause mortality (1.6% versus 2.1%; hazard ratio, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.63-0.95]; =0.012) and major bleeding (1.5% versus 2.7%; odds ratio, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.45-0.67]; <0.001) were lower with TRA. Subgroup analyses for mortality showed consistent results, except for baseline hemoglobin level (=0.003), indicating that the benefit of TRA was substantial in patients with moderate or severe anemia, whereas it was not significant in patients with milder or no baseline anemia. After adjustment, TRA remained associated with 24% and 51% relative risk reduction of all-cause mortality and major bleeding, respectively. A mediation analysis showed that the benefit of TRA on mortality was only partially driven by major bleeding prevention and ancillary mechanisms are required to fully explain the causal association.
TRA is associated with lower all-cause mortality and major bleeding at 30 days compared with TFA. The effect on mortality was driven by patients with anemia. The reduction in major bleeding only partially explains the mortality benefit.
URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero; Unique identifier: CRD42018109664.
在一些随机临床试验中,与经股动脉入路(TFA)相比,经桡动脉入路(TRA)可降低接受有创治疗的冠状动脉疾病患者的死亡率。我们分析了 TRA 与 TFA 在多中心随机临床试验中的效果,以及这些关联是否受患者或操作特征的影响。
我们对接受冠状动脉造影术伴或不伴经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者进行了多中心随机临床试验的个体患者数据荟萃分析,比较了 TRA 与 TFA。主要结局是全因死亡率,共同主要结局是 30 天内主要出血。基于意向治疗队列,采用 1 期混合效应模型进行主要分析。通过多变量分析进一步评估入路部位对死亡率和主要出血的影响。通过多变量调整的自然效果模型中介分析研究了入路部位、出血和死亡率之间的关系。
共纳入 7 项随机临床试验的 21600 例患者(TRA 组 10775 例,TFA 组 10825 例)。中位年龄为 63.9 岁,31.9%为女性,95%为急性冠状动脉综合征,75.2%接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。TRA 组全因死亡率(1.6%比 2.1%;风险比,0.77[95%置信区间,0.63-0.95];=0.012)和主要出血(1.5%比 2.7%;优势比,0.55[95%置信区间,0.45-0.67];<0.001)均较低。死亡率的亚组分析结果一致,除了基线血红蛋白水平(=0.003),表明 TRA 在中重度贫血患者中具有显著获益,而在轻度或无基线贫血患者中获益不显著。调整后,TRA 仍与全因死亡率和主要出血的相对风险分别降低 24%和 51%相关。中介分析表明,TRA 对死亡率的获益仅部分归因于主要出血的预防,需要辅助机制来充分解释因果关联。
与 TFA 相比,TRA 可降低 30 天内的全因死亡率和主要出血。死亡率的降低归因于贫血患者。主要出血的减少仅部分解释了死亡率的降低。
网址:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero;唯一标识符:CRD42018109664。