Risk and Health Impact Assessment, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium.
Family Medicine and Population Health, University of Antwerp, Belgium.
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Dec 10;851(Pt 2):158336. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158336. Epub 2022 Aug 26.
There is strong evidence of mortality being associated to extreme temperatures but the extent to which individual or residential factors modulate this temperature vulnerability is less clear.
We conducted a multi-city study with a time-stratified case-crossover design and used conditional logistic regression to examine the association between extreme temperatures and overall natural and cause-specific mortality. City-specific estimates were pooled using a random-effect meta-analysis to describe the global association. Cold and heat effects were assessed by comparing the mortality risks corresponding to the 2.5 and 97.5 percentiles of the daily temperature, respectively, with the minimum mortality temperature. For cold, we cumulated the risk over lags of 0 to 28 days before death and 0 to 7 days for heat. We carried out stratified analyses and assessed effect modification by individual characteristics, preexisting chronic health conditions and residential environment (population density, built-up area and air pollutants: PM, NO, O and black carbon) to identify more vulnerable population subgroups.
Based on 307,859 deaths from natural causes, we found significant cold effect (OR = 1.42, 95%CI: 1.30-1.57) and heat effect (OR = 1.17, 95%CI: 1.12-1.21) for overall natural mortality and for respiratory causes in particular. There were significant effects modifications for some health conditions: people with asthma were at higher risk for cold, and people with psychoses for heat. In addition, people with long or frequent hospital admissions in the year preceding death were at lower risk. Despite large uncertainties, there was suggestion of effect modification by air pollutants: the effect of heat was higher on more polluted days of O and black carbon, and a higher cold effect was observed on more polluted days of PM and NO while for O, the effect was lower.
These findings allow for targeted planning of public-health measures aiming to prevent the effects of extreme temperatures.
有强有力的证据表明死亡率与极端温度有关,但个体或居住因素在多大程度上调节这种温度脆弱性尚不清楚。
我们进行了一项多城市研究,采用时间分层病例交叉设计,并使用条件逻辑回归来检查极端温度与整体自然和特定原因死亡率之间的关系。使用随机效应荟萃分析汇总城市特异性估计值,以描述全球关联。通过将与每日温度的第 2.5 和 97.5 百分位数对应的死亡率风险分别与最低死亡率温度进行比较来评估冷和热效应。对于冷,我们在死亡前 0 至 28 天和热的 0 至 7 天的滞后期内累积风险。我们进行了分层分析,并评估了个体特征、预先存在的慢性健康状况和居住环境(人口密度、建成区和空气污染物:PM、NO、O 和黑碳)的修饰作用,以确定更脆弱的人群亚组。
基于 307859 例自然原因死亡,我们发现极端寒冷天气(OR=1.42,95%CI:1.30-1.57)和极端炎热天气(OR=1.17,95%CI:1.12-1.21)对整体自然死亡率和特别是呼吸系统疾病有显著影响。对于一些健康状况,存在显著的修饰作用:哮喘患者患冷的风险较高,精神疾病患者患热的风险较高。此外,在死亡前一年中经常住院或住院时间较长的人患冷的风险较低。尽管存在较大的不确定性,但空气污染物存在修饰作用的迹象:O 和黑碳污染程度较高的日子,热效应较高,PM 和 NO 污染程度较高的日子,冷效应较高,而 O 的效应较低。
这些发现为旨在预防极端温度影响的公共卫生措施的有针对性规划提供了依据。