Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Emergency Preparedness and Response, King's College London, London, UK.
BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 29;12(8):e061203. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061203.
To investigate changes in beliefs and behaviours following news of the Omicron variant and changes to guidance understanding of Omicron-related guidance, and factors associated with engaging with protective behaviours.
Series of cross-sectional surveys (1 November to 16 December 2021, five waves of data collection).
Online.
People living in England, aged 16 years or over (n=1622-1902 per wave).
Levels of worry and perceived risk, and engagement with key behaviours (out-of-home activities, risky social mixing, wearing a face covering and testing uptake).
Degree of worry and perceived risk of COVID-19 (to oneself and people in the UK) fluctuated over time, increasing slightly around the time of the announcement about Omicron (p<0.001). Understanding of rules in England was varied, ranging between 10.3% and 91.9%, with people overestimating the stringency of the new rules. Rates of wearing a face covering and testing increased over time (p<0.001). Meeting up with people from another household decreased around the time of the announcement of Omicron (29 November to 1 December), but then returned to previous levels (p=0.002). Associations with protective behaviours were investigated using regression analyses. There was no evidence for significant associations between out-of-home activity and worry or perceived risk (COVID-19 generally or Omicron-specific, p≥0.004; Bonferroni adjustment p<0.002 applied). Engaging in highest risk social mixing and always wearing a face covering were associated with worry and perceived risk about COVID-19 (p≤0.001). Always wearing a face covering in shops was associated with having heard more about Omicron (p<0.001).
Almost 2 years into the COVID-19 outbreak, the emergence of a novel variant of concern only slightly influenced worry and perceived risk. The main protective behaviour (wearing a face covering) promoted by new guidance showed significant re-uptake, but other protective behaviours showed little or no change.
调查奥密克戎变异株相关新闻发布后,人们的信念和行为变化,以及对奥密克戎相关指南的理解变化,并分析与采取保护行为相关的因素。
一系列横断面调查(2021 年 11 月 1 日至 12 月 16 日,共进行了 5 轮数据收集)。
在线。
居住在英格兰的 16 岁及以上人群(每轮调查 1622-1902 人)。
担忧和感知风险的程度,以及对关键行为(户外活动、高风险社交混合、戴口罩和检测参与度)的参与情况。
对 COVID-19(自身和英国人群)的担忧和感知风险程度随时间波动,在奥密克戎公布时略有上升(p<0.001)。英格兰规则的理解程度差异很大,在 10.3%至 91.9%之间,人们高估了新规则的严格程度。戴口罩和检测的比例随时间推移而增加(p<0.001)。与另一个家庭的人聚会在奥密克戎公布时(11 月 29 日至 12 月 1 日)减少,但随后恢复到以前的水平(p=0.002)。使用回归分析调查与保护行为的关联。户外活动与担忧或感知风险(一般 COVID-19或奥密克戎特异性,p≥0.004;Bonferroni 调整 p<0.002)之间没有证据表明存在显著关联。高风险社交混合和始终戴口罩与对 COVID-19 的担忧和感知风险相关(p≤0.001)。在商店始终戴口罩与更多地听说奥密克戎有关(p<0.001)。
在 COVID-19 爆发近 2 年后,新型关注变异株的出现仅略微影响了担忧和感知风险。新指南主要推荐的保护行为(戴口罩)显著重新采用,但其他保护行为几乎没有变化或变化很小。