• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多癌种早期检测基因组血液检测的潜在基于价值的价格,以补充美国当前的单一癌症筛查。

The Potential Value-Based Price of a Multi-Cancer Early Detection Genomic Blood Test to Complement Current Single Cancer Screening in the USA.

机构信息

GRAIL LLC, a subsidiary of Illumina Inc., 1525 O'Brien Drive, Menlo Park, CA, 94025, USA.

Evidence Synthesis, Modeling & Communication, Evidera Inc. (at time of study), Bethesda, MD, USA.

出版信息

Pharmacoeconomics. 2022 Nov;40(11):1107-1117. doi: 10.1007/s40273-022-01181-3. Epub 2022 Aug 30.

DOI:10.1007/s40273-022-01181-3
PMID:36038710
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9550746/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Multi-cancer early detection (MCED) testing could increase detection of cancer at early stages, when survival outcomes are better and treatment costs are lower, but is expected to increase screening costs. This study modeled an MCED test for 19 solid cancers in a US population and estimated the potential value-based price (the maximum price to meet a given willingness to pay) of the MCED test plus current single cancer screening (usual care) compared to usual care alone from a third-party payer perspective over a lifetime horizon.

METHODS

A hybrid cohort-level state-transition and decision-tree model was developed to estimate the clinical and economic outcomes of annual MCED testing between age 50 and 79 years. The impact on time and stage of diagnosis was computed using an interception modeling approach, with the consequences of cancer modeled based on stage at diagnosis. The model parameters were mainly sourced from the literature, including a published case-control study to inform MCED test performance. All costs were inflated to 2021 US dollars.

RESULTS

Multi-cancer early detection testing shifted cancer diagnoses to earlier stages, with a 53% reduction in stage IV cancer diagnoses, resulting in longer overall survival compared with usual care. Addition of MCED decreased per cancer treatment costs by $5421 and resulted in a gain of 0.13 and 0.38 quality-adjusted life-years across all individuals in the screening program and those diagnosed with cancer, respectively. At a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000 per quality-adjusted life-year gained, the potential value-based price of an MCED test was estimated at $1196. The projected survival of individuals diagnosed with cancer and the number of cancers detected at an earlier stage by MCED had the greatest impact on outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

An MCED test with high specificity would potentially improve long-term health outcomes and reduce cancer treatment costs, resulting in a value-based price of $1196 at a $100,000/quality-adjusted life-year willingness-to-pay threshold.

摘要

背景

多癌种早期检测(MCED)测试可以提高癌症早期的检出率,此时生存结果更好,治疗费用更低,但预计会增加筛查成本。本研究对美国人群中 19 种实体瘤的 MCED 测试进行了建模,并从第三方支付者的角度评估了 MCED 测试加当前单一癌症筛查(常规护理)相对于单独常规护理在终身范围内的潜在基于价值的价格(满足特定支付意愿的最高价格)。

方法

我们开发了一种混合队列水平的状态转换和决策树模型,用于估计 50 至 79 岁人群中每年进行 MCED 测试的临床和经济结果。使用截距建模方法计算对诊断时间和阶段的影响,基于诊断时的阶段对癌症的后果进行建模。模型参数主要来源于文献,包括一项用于提供 MCED 测试性能信息的已发表病例对照研究。所有成本均按 2021 年的美元进行了通胀调整。

结果

MCED 检测将癌症诊断提前到更早的阶段,IV 期癌症诊断减少了 53%,与常规护理相比,总生存期更长。添加 MCED 使每位癌症治疗成本降低了 5421 美元,并使整个筛查计划中的每个人和诊断出癌症的人分别获得了 0.13 和 0.38 个质量调整生命年。在 10 万美元/QALY 的支付意愿阈值下,MCED 测试的潜在基于价值的价格估计为 1196 美元。诊断出癌症的个体的预期生存时间和 MCED 更早检测到的癌症数量对结果的影响最大。

结论

特异性高的 MCED 测试可能会改善长期健康结果并降低癌症治疗成本,在 10 万美元/QALY 的支付意愿阈值下,其基于价值的价格为 1196 美元。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f267/9550746/ee7cfee19672/40273_2022_1181_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f267/9550746/af37932b0705/40273_2022_1181_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f267/9550746/24c9c51de380/40273_2022_1181_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f267/9550746/22a917e125cb/40273_2022_1181_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f267/9550746/724972f46668/40273_2022_1181_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f267/9550746/ee7cfee19672/40273_2022_1181_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f267/9550746/af37932b0705/40273_2022_1181_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f267/9550746/24c9c51de380/40273_2022_1181_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f267/9550746/22a917e125cb/40273_2022_1181_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f267/9550746/724972f46668/40273_2022_1181_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f267/9550746/ee7cfee19672/40273_2022_1181_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The Potential Value-Based Price of a Multi-Cancer Early Detection Genomic Blood Test to Complement Current Single Cancer Screening in the USA.多癌种早期检测基因组血液检测的潜在基于价值的价格,以补充美国当前的单一癌症筛查。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2022 Nov;40(11):1107-1117. doi: 10.1007/s40273-022-01181-3. Epub 2022 Aug 30.
2
An Exploratory Analysis of the Cost-Effectiveness of a Multi-cancer Early Detection Blood Test Compared with Standard of Care Screening in Ontario, Canada.加拿大安大略省多癌种早期检测血液检测与标准护理筛查的成本效益探索性分析。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2024 Apr;42(4):393-407. doi: 10.1007/s40273-023-01345-9. Epub 2023 Dec 27.
3
Multi-gene Pharmacogenomic Testing That Includes Decision-Support Tools to Guide Medication Selection for Major Depression: A Health Technology Assessment.多基因药物基因组学检测,包括用于指导抗抑郁药物选择的决策支持工具:一项卫生技术评估。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2021 Aug 12;21(13):1-214. eCollection 2021.
4
Modeling the population health impact of incorporating a multi-cancer early detection (MCED) test to existing cancer screening among immunocompromised individuals.建立模型评估将多癌种早期检测(MCED)试验纳入免疫功能低下人群现有癌症筛查计划对人群健康的影响。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2024 Sep;40(9):1577-1587. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2024.2386049. Epub 2024 Aug 17.
5
Estimating the population health impact of a multi-cancer early detection genomic blood test to complement existing screening in the US and UK.估算一种多癌种早期检测基因组血液检测对美国和英国现有筛查的人群健康影响。
Br J Cancer. 2021 Nov;125(10):1432-1442. doi: 10.1038/s41416-021-01498-4. Epub 2021 Aug 23.
6
Physicians' perception on using a multi-cancer early detection blood test to reduce disparities in cancer screening.医生对使用多癌种早期检测血液检测以减少癌症筛查差异的看法。
J Natl Med Assoc. 2024 Aug;116(4):325-327. doi: 10.1016/j.jnma.2024.07.011. Epub 2024 Jul 15.
7
Integrating Multi-Cancer Early Detection (MCED) Tests with Standard Cancer Screening: System Dynamics Model Development and Feasibility Testing.将多癌早期检测(MCED)测试与标准癌症筛查相结合:系统动力学模型开发与可行性测试。
Pharmacoecon Open. 2025 Jan;9(1):147-160. doi: 10.1007/s41669-024-00533-3. Epub 2024 Oct 18.
8
Multi-cancer early detection test in symptomatic patients referred for cancer investigation in England and Wales (SYMPLIFY): a large-scale, observational cohort study.英国和威尔士因癌症检查而转诊的有症状患者的多癌早期检测试验(SYMPLIFY):一项大规模观察性队列研究
Lancet Oncol. 2023 Jul;24(7):733-743. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00277-2. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
9
Projecting the Impact of Multi-Cancer Early Detection on Late-Stage Incidence Using Multi-State Disease Modeling.使用多状态疾病模型预测多癌种早期检测对晚期发病的影响。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2024 Jun 3;33(6):830-837. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-23-1470.
10
Patient Preferences for Multi-Cancer Early Detection (MCED) Screening Tests.患者对多癌种早期检测(MCED)筛查测试的偏好。
Patient. 2023 Jan;16(1):43-56. doi: 10.1007/s40271-022-00589-5. Epub 2022 Jul 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Liquid biopsy-based multi-cancer early detection: an exploration road from evidence to implementation.基于液体活检的多癌早期检测:从证据到实施的探索之路
Sci Bull (Beijing). 2025 Sep 15;70(17):2852-2867. doi: 10.1016/j.scib.2025.06.030. Epub 2025 Jun 24.
2
The Cost Effectiveness of Genomic Medicine in Cancer Control: A Systematic Literature Review.基因组医学在癌症控制中的成本效益:一项系统文献综述。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2025 May;23(3):359-393. doi: 10.1007/s40258-025-00949-w. Epub 2025 Mar 29.
3
Evaluation of an innovative multi-cancer early detection test: high sensitivity and specificity in differentiating cancer, inflammatory conditions, and healthy individuals.

本文引用的文献

1
Cost of cancer management by stage at diagnosis among Medicare beneficiaries.医疗保险受益人群中诊断时分期癌症管理的成本。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2022 Aug;38(8):1285-1294. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2022.2047536. Epub 2022 Apr 20.
2
Evaluating the impact of multicancer early detection testing on health and economic outcomes: Toward a decision modeling strategy.评估多癌种早期检测测试对健康和经济结果的影响:迈向决策建模策略。
Cancer. 2022 Feb 15;128 Suppl 4:892-908. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33980.
3
Sensitive and specific multi-cancer detection and localization using methylation signatures in cell-free DNA.
一种创新的多癌早期检测测试的评估:在区分癌症、炎症性疾病和健康个体方面具有高灵敏度和特异性。
Front Oncol. 2025 Mar 6;15:1520869. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1520869. eCollection 2025.
4
Estimating the Burden of False Positives and Implementation Costs From Adding Multiple Single Cancer Tests or a Single Multi-Cancer Test to Standard-Of-Care Screening.评估在标准护理筛查中增加多项单一癌症检测或一项多癌症检测所产生的假阳性负担和实施成本。
Cancer Med. 2025 Mar;14(6):e70776. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70776.
5
Transforming cancer screening: the potential of multi-cancer early detection (MCED) technologies.变革癌症筛查:多癌早期检测(MCED)技术的潜力
Int J Clin Oncol. 2025 Feb;30(2):180-193. doi: 10.1007/s10147-025-02694-5. Epub 2025 Jan 12.
6
Home Urine Dipstick Screening for Bladder and Kidney Cancer in High-Risk Populations in England: A Microsimulation Study of Long-Term Impact and Cost-Effectiveness.英格兰高危人群膀胱癌和肾癌的家庭尿液试纸筛查:长期影响和成本效益的微观模拟研究
Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 Apr;43(4):441-452. doi: 10.1007/s40273-024-01463-y. Epub 2025 Jan 3.
7
A Cost-Effective Two-Step Approach for Multi-Cancer Early Detection in High-Risk Populations.一种用于高危人群多癌早期检测的经济高效的两步法。
Cancer Res Commun. 2025 Jan 1;5(1):150-156. doi: 10.1158/2767-9764.CRC-24-0508.
8
Multiomics biomarkers were not superior to clinical variables for pan-cancer screening.对于泛癌筛查,多组学生物标志物并不优于临床变量。
Commun Med (Lond). 2024 Nov 17;4(1):234. doi: 10.1038/s43856-024-00671-z.
9
Integrating Multi-Cancer Early Detection (MCED) Tests with Standard Cancer Screening: System Dynamics Model Development and Feasibility Testing.将多癌早期检测(MCED)测试与标准癌症筛查相结合:系统动力学模型开发与可行性测试。
Pharmacoecon Open. 2025 Jan;9(1):147-160. doi: 10.1007/s41669-024-00533-3. Epub 2024 Oct 18.
10
Translation of Epigenetics in Cell-Free DNA Liquid Biopsy Technology and Precision Oncology.游离DNA液体活检技术与精准肿瘤学中的表观遗传学翻译
Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2024 Jun 27;46(7):6533-6565. doi: 10.3390/cimb46070390.
利用游离 DNA 中的甲基化特征进行敏感且特异的多癌种检测和定位。
Ann Oncol. 2020 Jun;31(6):745-759. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.02.011. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
4
Modeled Reductions in Late-stage Cancer with a Multi-Cancer Early Detection Test.多癌种早期检测试验可降低晚期癌症的发生率。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2021 Mar;30(3):460-468. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-1134. Epub 2020 Dec 16.
5
A Health Opportunity Cost Threshold for Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in the United States.美国成本效益分析的健康机会成本阈值。
Ann Intern Med. 2021 Jan;174(1):25-32. doi: 10.7326/M20-1392. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
6
Feasibility of blood testing combined with PET-CT to screen for cancer and guide intervention.血液检测结合 PET-CT 筛查癌症并指导干预的可行性。
Science. 2020 Jul 3;369(6499). doi: 10.1126/science.abb9601. Epub 2020 Apr 28.
7
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Lung Cancer Screening in the United States: A Comparative Modeling Study.美国肺癌筛查的成本效益分析:一项比较建模研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Dec 3;171(11):796-804. doi: 10.7326/M19-0322. Epub 2019 Nov 5.
8
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Epidemiology, Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment.非小细胞肺癌:流行病学、筛查、诊断和治疗。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2019 Aug;94(8):1623-1640. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2019.01.013.
9
Next-generation sequencing in liquid biopsy: cancer screening and early detection.液体活检中的下一代测序:癌症筛查和早期检测。
Hum Genomics. 2019 Aug 1;13(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s40246-019-0220-8.
10
Universal cancer screening: revolutionary, rational, and realizable.通用癌症筛查:具有革命性、合理性且切实可行。
NPJ Precis Oncol. 2018 Oct 29;2:23. doi: 10.1038/s41698-018-0066-x. eCollection 2018.