Curry Helen Anne
Department of History and Philosophy of Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3RH, United Kingdom.
Isis. 2022 Sep;113(3):610-617. doi: 10.1086/721075.
Accounts of twentieth-century agricultural industrialization in the United States and beyond often center the production and distribution of commercial F1 hybrid seed as a pivotal development. The commercialization of hybrid corn seed in the 1930s was initially heralded as a science-driven advance in agricultural productivity. However, since the 1970s "hybrid seed" has been linked to many perceived perils attendant on industrialized agriculture, from the undermining of farmers' independence to the diminishment of crop genetic diversity to the consolidation of corporate control over the global food system. First grouped with the semidwarf varieties of the Green Revolution to emblematize capital- and chemical-intensive agriculture, hybrids are today often lumped together with genetically modified (GM) varieties for much the same reason. This essay revisits the scholarship that helped produce this understanding of hybrid seed. It explores how and why the singular history of hybrid corn inflected understandings of crop breeding and seed production in general, contributing to lasting confusion about the promises and pitfalls of distinct approaches to crop development and the nature of hybrid seed.
关于20世纪美国及其他地区农业产业化的叙述,往往将商业杂交F1种子的生产和销售作为关键发展内容。20世纪30年代杂交玉米种子的商业化最初被誉为农业生产力方面由科学推动的进步。然而,自20世纪70年代以来,“杂交种子”与工业化农业带来的许多危险联系在一起,从削弱农民独立性到减少作物遗传多样性,再到企业对全球粮食系统控制权的巩固。杂交品种最初与绿色革命的半矮秆品种归为一类,象征着资本和化学密集型农业,如今常常出于同样原因与转基因品种混为一谈。本文回顾了促成这种对杂交种子理解的学术研究。它探讨了杂交玉米独特的历史如何以及为何影响了对作物育种和种子生产的总体理解,导致人们对不同作物培育方法的前景和陷阱以及杂交种子的本质一直存在困惑。