Soler Evangelina, de Mendoza Amanda, Cuello Víctor I, Silva-Vetri Maria G, Núñez Zoilangel H, Ortega Ramsés G, Rizvi Syed A, Sanchez-Gonzalez Marcos, Ferrer Gustavo
Department of Pulmonolgy, Clinica Corazones Unidos, Santo Domingo, DOM.
Department of Research, Universidad Nacional Pedro Henríquez Ureña School of Medicine, Santo Domingo, DOM.
Cureus. 2022 Jul 23;14(7):e27182. doi: 10.7759/cureus.27182. eCollection 2022 Jul.
It is well known that acute COVID-19 infection can present with a variety of symptoms, including fever, cough, rhinitis, loss of taste, and the cardinal sign of loss of smell (anosmia). Recently, nasal irrigations with saline and other agents have shown promise for the treatment of COVID-19. Xylitol has been shown to display virucidal effects against SARS-CoV-2. This study aimed to examine the efficacy of xylitol as an adjunct treatment for COVID-19 in an outpatient setting. In a randomized controlled double-blinded fashion, a total of 50 participants (F=30) consented to participate in this study. It was a population of 18 to 65 years of age, with polymerase chain reaction confirmed for SARS-COV-2 by nasopharyngeal swab, less than three days from the start of symptoms. This study's primary endpoint was time to clinical recovery, defined as the change from baseline to end of treatment in COVID-19 symptoms. Outcome variables were the changes in visual analog scale (VAS) and daily symptoms score (DSS) on Days 1-7, 14, and 28 after the initiation of the 14-day treatment. There were no differences between the treatment groups in any demographic and subject characteristics-related variables, including vaccination status. None of the patients were hospitalized, or required emergency visits in addition to no adverse reactions were reported. There were no statistically significant interactions found for VAS (P=0.124), DSS (P=0.448), and sense of smell (P=0.667). The proportion of patients reporting nasal congestion was higher (X=5.05; P=0.025) in the xylitol (XYL) group (73.1%) vs. the saline (SAL) group (41.7%) on Day 4, and on Day 7 (X=5.72; P=0.017) XYL group (50.0%) vs. SAL group (17.4%). During Day 28 a total of two patients in the SAL group had anosmia vs. no patients with anosmia in the XYL group, although this difference did not reach statistical significance (X=5.72; P=0.133). Results demonstrate that both xylitol and saline were equally effective in decreasing the time of symptom resolution and preventing hospitalizations, yet, persistent anosmia was only seen in the SAL group. Intranasal xylitol might play a pivotal role in preventing persistent olfactory abnormalities in post-COVID-19 patients.
众所周知,新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)急性感染可表现出多种症状,包括发热、咳嗽、鼻炎、味觉丧失以及嗅觉丧失(嗅觉减退)这一主要症状。最近,用盐水和其他制剂进行鼻腔冲洗已显示出对COVID-19的治疗前景。木糖醇已被证明对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)具有杀病毒作用。本研究旨在探讨木糖醇作为门诊COVID-19辅助治疗的疗效。采用随机对照双盲方式,共有50名参与者(女性=30名)同意参与本研究。研究对象为18至65岁人群,通过鼻咽拭子经聚合酶链反应确诊感染SARS-CoV-2,且症状出现不到三天。本研究的主要终点是临床康复时间,定义为COVID-19症状从基线到治疗结束的变化。观察变量为在开始为期14天的治疗后第1 - 7天、14天和28天视觉模拟量表(VAS)和每日症状评分(DSS)的变化。治疗组在任何人口统计学和与受试者特征相关的变量(包括疫苗接种状况)方面均无差异。所有患者均未住院,也无需急诊就诊,且未报告不良反应。在VAS(P = 0.124)、DSS(P = 0.448)和嗅觉(P = 0.667)方面未发现具有统计学意义的交互作用。在第4天,木糖醇(XYL)组(73.1%)报告鼻塞的患者比例高于盐水(SAL)组(41.7%)(X = 5.05;P = 0.025),在第7天,XYL组(50.0%)高于SAL组(17.4%)(X = 5.72;P = 0.017)。在第28天,SAL组共有两名患者嗅觉减退,而XYL组无嗅觉减退患者,尽管这一差异未达到统计学意义(X = 5.72;P = 0.133)。结果表明,木糖醇和盐水在缩短症状缓解时间和预防住院方面同样有效,但只有SAL组出现了持续性嗅觉减退。鼻内使用木糖醇可能在预防COVID-19后患者持续性嗅觉异常方面发挥关键作用。