Koebel Kourtney, Pohler Dionne, Gomez Rafael, Mohan Akshay
Centre for Industrial Relations and Human Resources, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Can Public Policy. 2021 Jun 1;47(2):316-333. doi: 10.3138/cpp.2020-117.
Income support programs introduced for workers during the first wave of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) lockdowns faced criticism for their negative labour supply effects. We propose that these concerns about work disincentives are embedded in restrictive assumptions about work and led to suboptimal design of crisis support policies. We describe a framework for analyzing alternative crisis income support programs predicated on more realistic assumptions of labour markets and human motivation. Our framework proposes that balancing efficiency, equity, and voice objectives should be the goal of crisis labour market policies. We argue that adoption of a basic income targeted toward low-income workers, in combination with Canada's pre-existing Employment Insurance program, would have balanced efficiency, equity, and voice better than the combination of the Canada Emergency Response Benefit and Canada Emergency Wage Subsidy. A targeted basic income would also have been more effective at achieving stated public health objectives.
在2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)第一波封锁期间为工人推出的收入支持计划因其对劳动力供给的负面影响而受到批评。我们认为,这些对工作激励的担忧源于对工作的限制性假设,并导致了危机支持政策的次优设计。我们描述了一个框架,用于分析基于更现实的劳动力市场和人类动机假设的替代性危机收入支持计划。我们的框架提出,平衡效率、公平和发言权目标应该是危机劳动力市场政策的目标。我们认为,针对低收入工人的基本收入,与加拿大现有的就业保险计划相结合,比加拿大紧急应对福利和加拿大紧急工资补贴的组合能更好地平衡效率、公平和发言权。有针对性的基本收入在实现既定的公共卫生目标方面也会更有效。