• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comprehension, utility, and preferences of prostate cancer survivors for visual timelines of patient-reported outcomes co-designed for limited graph literacy: meters and emojis over comics.前列腺癌幸存者对为有限图表阅读能力设计的患者报告结局的可视化时间线的理解、实用性和偏好:米尺和表情符号优于漫画。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Oct 7;29(11):1838-1846. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac148.
2
Patient preferences for visualization of longitudinal patient-reported outcomes data.患者对纵向患者报告结局数据可视化的偏好。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Feb 1;27(2):212-224. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz189.
3
The effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the informed consent process of health care users: a systematic review protocol.健康素养干预措施对医疗保健使用者知情同意过程的有效性:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):82-94. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2304.
4
Visual analogies, not graphs, increase patients' comprehension of changes in their health status.直观类比,而非图表,能提高患者对自身健康状况变化的理解。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 May 1;27(5):677-689. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz217.
5
Relevance of graph literacy in the development of patient-centered communication tools.图表素养在以患者为中心的沟通工具开发中的相关性。
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Mar;99(3):448-454. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.09.009. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
6
Preference for and understanding of graphs presenting health risk information. The role of age, health literacy, numeracy and graph literacy.偏好和理解呈现健康风险信息的图表。年龄、健康素养、计算能力和图表素养的作用。
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Jan;104(1):109-117. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.06.031. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
7
User-centered design of quality of life reports for clinical care of patients with prostate cancer.以患者为中心的前列腺癌患者临床护理生活质量报告设计。
Surgery. 2014 May;155(5):789-96. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2013.12.007. Epub 2013 Dec 14.
8
Tailoring language for genitourinary function in patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer to facilitate discussions in diverse populations and overcome health literacy barriers.针对新诊断为前列腺癌的患者的泌尿生殖功能进行语言定制,以促进不同人群的讨论并克服健康素养障碍。
Cancer. 2024 Oct 15;130 Suppl 20:3602-3611. doi: 10.1002/cncr.35498. Epub 2024 Sep 10.
9
Improving Access to Standardized Fertility Preservation Information for Older Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer: Using a User-Centered Approach with Young Adult Patients, Survivors, and Partners to Refine Fertility Knowledge Transfer.改善癌症青少年及青年成人获取标准化生育力保存信息的途径:采用以用户为中心的方法,与青年成人患者、幸存者及其伴侣共同完善生育力知识传播。
J Cancer Educ. 2018 Jun;33(3):528-535. doi: 10.1007/s13187-016-1108-0.
10
Does Animation Improve Comprehension of Risk Information in Patients with Low Health Literacy? A Randomized Trial.动画是否能提高低健康素养患者对风险信息的理解?一项随机试验。
Med Decis Making. 2020 Jan;40(1):17-28. doi: 10.1177/0272989X19890296. Epub 2019 Dec 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Tailored Self-Management App to Support Older Adults With Cancer and Multimorbidity: Development and Usability Testing.定制化自我管理应用程序支持患有癌症和多种疾病的老年患者:开发和可用性测试。
JMIR Aging. 2024 May 8;7:e53163. doi: 10.2196/53163.
2
Codesign of health technology interventions to support best-practice perioperative care and surgical waitlist management.健康技术干预措施的协同设计,以支持最佳实践围手术期护理和手术等候名单管理。
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2024 Mar 12;31(1):e100928. doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2023-100928.
3
Community engagement in the development of health-related data visualizations: a scoping review.社区参与健康相关数据可视化的开发:范围综述。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024 Jan 18;31(2):479-487. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad090.
4
A RE-AIM Evaluation of a Visualization-Based Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome System.基于可视化的电子患者报告结局系统的再评价研究
Appl Clin Inform. 2023 Mar;14(2):227-237. doi: 10.1055/a-2008-4036. Epub 2023 Jan 5.
5
Meeting the information and communication needs of health disparate populations.满足健康状况存在差异人群的信息与沟通需求。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Oct 7;29(11):1827-1828. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac164.

本文引用的文献

1
The Science of Visual Data Communication: What Works.视觉数据通信科学:有效方法。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2021 Dec;22(3):110-161. doi: 10.1177/15291006211051956.
2
Improving diversity in research and trial participation: the challenges of language.提高研究和试验参与的多样性:语言方面的挑战。
Lancet Public Health. 2021 Jul;6(7):e445-e446. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(21)00100-6.
3
Graph literacy matters: Examining the association between graph literacy, health literacy, and numeracy in a Medicaid eligible population.图形阅读能力很重要:在符合医疗补助条件的人群中,考察图形阅读能力、健康素养和计算能力之间的关系。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 11;15(11):e0241844. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241844. eCollection 2020.
4
Impact of Limited Health Literacy on Patient-Reported Outcomes in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.有限健康素养对系统性红斑狼疮患者报告结局的影响。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2021 Jan;73(1):110-119. doi: 10.1002/acr.24361.
5
Preference for and understanding of graphs presenting health risk information. The role of age, health literacy, numeracy and graph literacy.偏好和理解呈现健康风险信息的图表。年龄、健康素养、计算能力和图表素养的作用。
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Jan;104(1):109-117. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.06.031. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
6
Loneliness and social isolation during the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间的孤独与社会隔离
Int Psychogeriatr. 2020 Oct;32(10):1217-1220. doi: 10.1017/S1041610220000988. Epub 2020 May 26.
7
Visual analogies, not graphs, increase patients' comprehension of changes in their health status.直观类比,而非图表,能提高患者对自身健康状况变化的理解。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 May 1;27(5):677-689. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz217.
8
Patient preferences for visualization of longitudinal patient-reported outcomes data.患者对纵向患者报告结局数据可视化的偏好。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Feb 1;27(2):212-224. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz189.
9
A Systematic Review of Patient-Facing Visualizations of Personal Health Data.个人健康数据患者可视化的系统评价
Appl Clin Inform. 2019 Aug;10(4):751-770. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1697592. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
10
Using the Short Graph Literacy Scale to Predict Precursors of Health Behavior Change.使用简短图形读写能力量表预测健康行为改变的前兆。
Med Decis Making. 2019 Apr;39(3):183-195. doi: 10.1177/0272989X19829728. Epub 2019 Mar 8.

前列腺癌幸存者对为有限图表阅读能力设计的患者报告结局的可视化时间线的理解、实用性和偏好:米尺和表情符号优于漫画。

Comprehension, utility, and preferences of prostate cancer survivors for visual timelines of patient-reported outcomes co-designed for limited graph literacy: meters and emojis over comics.

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.

Department of Biobehavioral Nursing and Health Informatics, School of Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.

出版信息

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Oct 7;29(11):1838-1846. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac148.

DOI:10.1093/jamia/ocac148
PMID:36040190
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9552288/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Visual timelines of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) can help prostate cancer survivors manage longitudinal data, compare with population averages, and consider future trajectories. PRO visualizations are most effective when designed with deliberate consideration of users. Yet, graph literacy is often overlooked as a design constraint, particularly when users with limited graph literacy are not engaged in their development. We conducted user testing to assess comprehension, utility, and preference of longitudinal PRO visualizations designed for prostate cancer survivors with limited literacy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Building upon our prior work co-designing longitudinal PRO visualizations with survivors, we engaged 18 prostate cancer survivors in a user study to assess 4 prototypes: Meter, Words, Comic, and Emoji. During remote sessions, we collected data on prototype comprehension (gist and verbatim), utility, and preference.

RESULTS

Participants were aged 61-77 (M = 69), of whom half were African American. The majority of participants had less than a college degree (95%), had inadequate health literacy (78%), and low graph literacy (89%). Among the 4 prototypes, Meter had the best gist comprehension and was preferred. Emoji was also preferred, had the highest verbatim comprehension, and highest rated utility, including helpfulness, confidence, and satisfaction. Meter and Words both rated mid-range for utility, and Words scored lower than Emoji and Meter for comprehension. Comic had the poorest comprehension, lowest utility, and was least preferred.

DISCUSSION

Findings identify design considerations for PRO visualizations, contributing to the knowledge base for visualization best practices. We describe our process to meaningfully engage patients from diverse and hard-to-reach groups for remote user testing, an important endeavor for health equity in biomedical informatics.

CONCLUSION

Graph literacy is an important design consideration for PRO visualizations. Biomedical informatics researchers should be intentional in understanding user needs by involving diverse and representative individuals during development.

摘要

目的

患者报告结局(PRO)的可视化时间线有助于前列腺癌幸存者管理纵向数据,与人群平均值进行比较,并考虑未来的轨迹。当 PRO 可视化设计考虑到用户的需求时,其效果最佳。然而,在设计时通常会忽略图表素养,特别是当有限图表素养的用户未参与其开发时。我们进行了用户测试,以评估针对低文化素养的前列腺癌幸存者设计的纵向 PRO 可视化的理解、实用性和偏好。

材料与方法

基于我们与幸存者共同设计纵向 PRO 可视化的前期工作,我们邀请了 18 名前列腺癌幸存者参与用户研究,以评估 4 个原型:Meter、Words、Comic 和 Emoji。在远程会议期间,我们收集了有关原型理解(要点和逐字)、实用性和偏好的数据。

结果

参与者的年龄为 61-77 岁(M=69),其中一半是非洲裔美国人。大多数参与者的受教育程度低于大学(95%),健康素养不足(78%),图表素养低(89%)。在这 4 个原型中,Meter 的要点理解最好,也最受欢迎。Emoji 也很受欢迎,具有最高的逐字理解,并且实用性评分最高,包括有用性、信心和满意度。Meter 和 Words 的实用性评分都居中,而 Words 的理解得分低于 Emoji 和 Meter。Comic 的理解得分最差,实用性评分最低,也最不受欢迎。

讨论

研究结果确定了 PRO 可视化的设计考虑因素,为可视化最佳实践知识库做出了贡献。我们描述了我们的过程,即通过远程用户测试有意义地参与来自不同和难以接触的群体的患者,这是生物医学信息学中健康公平的重要努力。

结论

图表素养是 PRO 可视化的重要设计考虑因素。生物医学信息学研究人员应该在开发过程中通过让不同和有代表性的个人参与,有意了解用户的需求。