• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对新诊断为前列腺癌的患者的泌尿生殖功能进行语言定制,以促进不同人群的讨论并克服健康素养障碍。

Tailoring language for genitourinary function in patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer to facilitate discussions in diverse populations and overcome health literacy barriers.

机构信息

Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

出版信息

Cancer. 2024 Oct 15;130 Suppl 20:3602-3611. doi: 10.1002/cncr.35498. Epub 2024 Sep 10.

DOI:10.1002/cncr.35498
PMID:39254372
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Poor comprehension of prostate cancer (PCa) medical terms can create barriers to PCa treatment discussions. The authors measured comprehension of PCa terms and its relationship to health literacy in a group of Black men who were newly diagnosed with PCa. They examined whether tailoring communication with alternative colloquial words would be helpful and acceptable.

METHODS

Patients were recruited from urology clinics (N = 152). After they met with their providers to discuss PCa treatment options, they participated in an educational supplement delivered as a structured interview. The supplement tailored PCa treatment information by allowing men to choose between colloquial and medical terms for genitourinary (GU) function. Health literacy was measured using the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine, and comprehension of common PCa terms was assessed using published methods. Pearson correlation was used to estimate the association between health literacy and comprehension of PCa terms. Spearman rank correlation (r) was used to assess the relation between the total number of medical terms preferred (range, 0-10) and Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine scores (range, 0-66).

RESULTS

Most patients (62%) had low health literacy, which was strongly correlated with their understanding of PCa terms (r = 0.526; p < .001). Poor comprehension of many PCa terms established the need to use alternative language for GU function (only 20% knew the word incontinence). There was a statistically significant positive association between the number of medical terms preferred and health literacy (r = 0.358; p < .001). A majority of patients (91%) preferred a mixture of medical and colloquial terms.

CONCLUSIONS

Tailoring communications with colloquial terms for GU function was preferred by most patients regardless of health literacy.

摘要

背景

对前列腺癌 (PCa) 医学术语理解能力差可能会成为 PCa 治疗讨论的障碍。作者在一组新诊断为 PCa 的黑人男性中测量了对 PCa 术语的理解及其与健康素养的关系。他们研究了用替代的俗语来调整沟通是否会有帮助和被接受。

方法

从泌尿科诊所招募患者(N=152)。在与他们的医生讨论 PCa 治疗方案后,他们参加了一个结构化访谈形式的教育补充课程。该补充课程通过允许男性选择俗语和医学术语来调整 PCa 治疗信息,以用于泌尿生殖系统 (GU) 功能。使用成人医学阅读快速估计 (Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine) 来衡量健康素养,使用已发表的方法评估对常见 PCa 术语的理解。使用 Pearson 相关系数来估计健康素养与对 PCa 术语的理解之间的关联。使用 Spearman 秩相关系数 (r) 来评估选择的医学术语总数 (范围为 0-10) 与成人医学阅读快速估计 (Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine) 得分 (范围为 0-66) 之间的关系。

结果

大多数患者(62%)的健康素养较低,这与他们对 PCa 术语的理解能力密切相关 (r=0.526;p<0.001)。对许多 PCa 术语的理解能力差表明需要使用替代语言来描述 GU 功能(只有 20%的人知道失禁这个词)。选择的医学术语数量与健康素养之间存在显著的正相关关系 (r=0.358;p<0.001)。大多数患者(91%)更喜欢使用医学术语和俗语的混合术语。

结论

无论健康素养如何,大多数患者都更喜欢使用俗语来调整 GU 功能方面的沟通。

相似文献

1
Tailoring language for genitourinary function in patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer to facilitate discussions in diverse populations and overcome health literacy barriers.针对新诊断为前列腺癌的患者的泌尿生殖功能进行语言定制,以促进不同人群的讨论并克服健康素养障碍。
Cancer. 2024 Oct 15;130 Suppl 20:3602-3611. doi: 10.1002/cncr.35498. Epub 2024 Sep 10.
2
Health literacy and shared decision making for prostate cancer patients with low socioeconomic status.社会经济地位较低的前列腺癌患者的健康素养与共同决策
Cancer Invest. 2001;19(7):684-91. doi: 10.1081/cnv-100106143.
3
The effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the informed consent process of health care users: a systematic review protocol.健康素养干预措施对医疗保健使用者知情同意过程的有效性:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):82-94. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2304.
4
Lack of comprehension of common prostate cancer terms in an underserved population.在服务不足的人群中对常见前列腺癌术语缺乏理解。
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Apr 20;27(12):2015-21. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.17.3468. Epub 2009 Mar 23.
5
Severe lack of comprehension of common prostate health terms among low-income inner-city men.低收入城市内男性对常见前列腺健康术语严重缺乏理解。
Cancer. 2013 Sep 1;119(17):3204-11. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28186. Epub 2013 Jun 3.
6
Video-based educational tool improves patient comprehension of common prostate health terminology.基于视频的教育工具提高了患者对常见前列腺健康术语的理解。
Cancer. 2015 Mar 1;121(5):733-40. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29101. Epub 2014 Nov 12.
7
Evidence-based patient choice: a prostate cancer decision aid in plain language.循证患者选择:一份通俗易懂的前列腺癌决策辅助工具
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2005 Jun 20;5:16. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-5-16.
8
Can adults with low literacy understand shared decision making questions? A qualitative investigation.识字能力低的成年人能理解共同决策问题吗?一项定性研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Nov;99(11):1796-1802. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.05.008. Epub 2016 May 9.
9
Applicability of the REALM health literacy test to an English second-language South African population.REALM健康素养测试在南非英语非母语人群中的适用性。
Pharm World Sci. 2010 Aug;32(4):464-71. doi: 10.1007/s11096-010-9392-y. Epub 2010 May 20.
10
Health literacy-listening skill and patient questions following cancer prevention and screening discussions.健康素养——癌症预防与筛查讨论后的倾听技巧及患者问题
Health Expect. 2016 Aug;19(4):920-34. doi: 10.1111/hex.12387. Epub 2015 Jul 22.