Suppr超能文献

手在不同热状态和刺激强度下的高密度热敏感性。

High-density thermal sensitivity of the hand under different thermal states and stimulus intensities.

机构信息

School of Mechanical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Indoor Air. 2022 Aug;32(8):e13089. doi: 10.1111/ina.13089.

Abstract

Understanding how the human body senses small-scale heating and cooling stimuli can help researchers evaluate thermal comfort effects and health risks of thermal stimulus combinations under complex thermal exposure. Two experiments measured high-density thermal sensitivity on the hand to investigate whether the initial thermal states and stimulus intensities affect thermal sensitivity. After pilot tests, a 23°C cold-water bath and a 41°C hot-water bath were applied to create initial states deviating from thermal neutrality. The whole hand and part of the wrist with all test spots were immersed for 1 min and dried by a towel. Results showed that cold sensitivity and warmth sensitivity have a linear relationship with each other, but 16 of 20 subjects (80%) were more sensitive to cooling than to heating. The 1-min water-bath treatment significantly reduced hand thermal sensitivity. Compared with a thermally neutral state, a cold-water bath and hot-water bath reduced cold sensitivity by 22% and 61%, respectively, and reduced warmth sensitivity by 47% and 51%, respectively. Under a thermally neutral state, the perceptible thresholds for cooling and heating stimuli were -1.3°C and +1.8°C, respectively. Comfortable stimulating temperature ranges were 24°C-30°C for cooling and 34°C-39°C for heating. Thermal sensitivity differences among stimulus intensities were small, but differences among test spots and subjects were significant.

摘要

了解人体如何感知微小尺度的加热和冷却刺激,可以帮助研究人员评估复杂热暴露下热刺激组合的热舒适效应和健康风险。两项实验在手背上测量了高密度的热敏感性,以研究初始热状态和刺激强度是否会影响热敏感性。在初步测试后,用 23°C 的冷水浴和 41°C 的热水浴来制造初始状态,使其偏离热中性。整个手和部分手腕上的所有测试点浸泡 1 分钟,并用毛巾擦干。结果表明,冷敏性和温敏性之间存在线性关系,但 20 名受试者中有 16 名(80%)对冷却的敏感度高于加热。1 分钟的水浴处理显著降低了手部的热敏感性。与热中性状态相比,冷水浴和热水浴分别使冷敏性降低了 22%和 61%,使温敏性降低了 47%和 51%。在热中性状态下,冷却和加热刺激的可感知阈值分别为-1.3°C 和+1.8°C。冷却的舒适刺激温度范围为 24°C-30°C,加热的舒适刺激温度范围为 34°C-39°C。刺激强度之间的热敏感性差异较小,但测试点和受试者之间的差异较大。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验