• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Availability of New Medicines in the US and Germany From 2004 to 2018.2004 年至 2018 年美国和德国新药的供应情况。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Aug 1;5(8):e2229231. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.29231.
2
Cancer Therapy Approval Timings, Review Speed, and Publication of Pivotal Registration Trials in the US and Europe, 2010-2019.2010-2019 年美国和欧洲的癌症治疗审批时间、审查速度和关键注册试验的发表情况。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jun 1;5(6):e2216183. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.16183.
3
Approvals and Timing of New Formulations of Novel Drugs Approved by the US Food and Drug Administration Between 1995 and 2010 and Followed Through 2021.1995 年至 2010 年期间获得美国食品和药物管理局批准的新型药物的新配方的批准和时间,并跟踪到 2021 年。
JAMA Health Forum. 2022 May 20;3(5):e221096. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.1096. eCollection 2022 May.
4
Approval of Cancer Drugs With Uncertain Therapeutic Value: A Comparison of Regulatory Decisions in Europe and the United States.具有不确定治疗价值的癌症药物的批准:欧洲和美国的监管决策比较。
Milbank Q. 2020 Dec;98(4):1219-1256. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12476. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
5
Potential Cost Implications for All US Food and Drug Administration Oncology Drug Approvals in 2018.2018 年所有获得美国食品和药物管理局批准的肿瘤药物的潜在成本影响。
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Feb 1;181(2):162-167. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.5921.
6
Analysis of Launch and Postapproval Cancer Drug Pricing, Clinical Benefit, and Policy Implications in the US and Europe.美国和欧洲的癌症药物上市后定价、临床获益分析及其政策影响
JAMA Oncol. 2021 Sep 1;7(9):e212026. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.2026. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
7
Evaluation of Drug Trials in High-, Middle-, and Low-Income Countries and Local Commercial Availability of Newly Approved Drugs.高、中、低收入国家药物试验评估和新批准药物的当地商业供应情况。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 May 3;4(5):e217075. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.7075.
8
Analysis of Supportive Evidence for US Food and Drug Administration Approvals of Novel Drugs in 2020.2020 年美国食品和药物管理局批准新药的支持性证据分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 May 2;5(5):e2212454. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.12454.
9
To what degree are review outcomes aligned for new active substances (NASs) between the European Medicines Agency and the US Food and Drug Administration? A comparison based on publicly available information for NASs initially approved in the time period 2014 to 2016.欧洲药品管理局和美国食品药品监督管理局对新活性物质(NASs)的审评结果一致性如何?基于2014年至2016年期间首次获批的NASs公开信息进行的比较。
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 25;9(11):e028677. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028677.
10
Analysis of Control Arm Quality in Randomized Clinical Trials Leading to Anticancer Drug Approval by the US Food and Drug Administration.分析美国食品和药物管理局批准的抗癌药物随机临床试验中的对照臂质量。
JAMA Oncol. 2019 Jun 1;5(6):887-892. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.0167.

引用本文的文献

1
Approval Disparities for New Drugs in the US and Japan.美国和日本新药审批差异
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jun 2;8(6):e2513640. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.13640.
2
The Innovation Paradox in Emerging Pharmaceutical Markets: Barriers and Opportunities for Sustainable Development.新兴制药市场中的创新悖论:可持续发展的障碍与机遇
Pharm Res. 2025 May 29. doi: 10.1007/s11095-025-03856-w.
3
Expert recommendations for Germany's integration of psychedelic-assisted therapy.德国迷幻辅助治疗融入的专家建议。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Oct 24;24(1):1202. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06141-3.
4
Measuring and Understanding Market Exclusivity Length for New Prescription Drugs in France, Australia, and the USA.测量和理解法国、澳大利亚和美国新处方药的市场独占期长度。
Pharmaceut Med. 2024 Jul;38(4):303-310. doi: 10.1007/s40290-024-00527-w. Epub 2024 Jul 14.
5
Therapeutic value of first versus supplemental indications of drugs in US and Europe (2011-20): retrospective cohort study.美国和欧洲(2011-20 年)药物一线与二线适应证的治疗价值:回顾性队列研究。
BMJ. 2023 Jul 5;382:e074166. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-074166.

本文引用的文献

1
Medicare and the Shocking US Food and Drug Administration Approval of Aducanumab: Crisis or Opportunity?医疗保险与美国食品药品监督管理局令人震惊地批准阿杜卡单抗:危机还是机遇?
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Oct 1;181(10):1278-1280. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.4610.
2
Approval of Cancer Drugs With Uncertain Therapeutic Value: A Comparison of Regulatory Decisions in Europe and the United States.具有不确定治疗价值的癌症药物的批准:欧洲和美国的监管决策比较。
Milbank Q. 2020 Dec;98(4):1219-1256. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12476. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
3
Lower Prices and Greater Patient Access - Lessons from Germany's Drug-Purchasing Structure.更低的价格与更高的患者可及性——德国药品采购结构的经验教训
N Engl J Med. 2020 Jun 4;382(23):2177-2179. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2000341.
4
A Comparison of EMA and FDA Decisions for New Drug Marketing Applications 2014-2016: Concordance, Discordance, and Why.2014-2016 年新药上市申请中 EMA 和 FDA 决策的比较:一致性、不一致性及原因。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2020 Jan;107(1):195-202. doi: 10.1002/cpt.1565. Epub 2019 Aug 14.
5
The Impact Of Price Regulation On The Availability Of New Drugs In Germany.价格管制对德国新药供应的影响。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Jul;38(7):1182-1187. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05142.
6
Drugs and Devices: Comparison of European and U.S. Approval Processes.药物与器械:欧洲和美国审批流程之比较
JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2016 Aug 29;1(5):399-412. doi: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2016.06.003. eCollection 2016 Aug.
7
Pharmaceutical Pricing in Germany: How Is Value Determined within the Scope of AMNOG?德国的药品定价:在加速审批程序(AMNOG)范围内价值是如何确定的?
Value Health. 2017 Jul-Aug;20(7):927-935. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.04.006. Epub 2017 May 16.
8
Is American Health Care Uniquely Inefficient? Evidence from Prescription Drugs.美国医疗保健是否效率极低?来自处方药的证据。
Am Econ Rev. 2017 May;107(5):486-490. doi: 10.1257/aer.p20171086.
9
Regulatory Review of New Therapeutic Agents - FDA versus EMA, 2011-2015.新型治疗药物的监管审查——美国食品药品监督管理局与欧洲药品管理局对比,2011 - 2015年
N Engl J Med. 2017 Apr 6;376(14):1386-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1700103.
10
"New drug" designations for new therapeutic entities: new active substance, new chemical entity, new biological entity, new molecular entity.“新药”指定用于新治疗实体的药物:新活性物质、新化学实体、新生物实体、新分子实体。
J Med Chem. 2014 Nov 13;57(21):8729-65. doi: 10.1021/jm402001w. Epub 2014 Sep 4.

2004 年至 2018 年美国和德国新药的供应情况。

Availability of New Medicines in the US and Germany From 2004 to 2018.

机构信息

Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.

London School of Economics, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Aug 1;5(8):e2229231. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.29231.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.29231
PMID:36040738
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9428736/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Germany's unique approach to coverage determination and pricing has ensured that effective medicines remain on the market, often at prices reduced through negotiation. However, less is known about trade-offs of this approach with regard to initial availability of medicines.

OBJECTIVE

To examine differences in the timing and scope of new medicines available in Germany and the US.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective cohort study analyzed initial availability of new medicines approved by regulatory agencies in Germany and the US between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2018, and followed up through December 31, 2019. Data analysis was conducted from January 1, 2020, to July 1, 2022. A total of 599 novel approvals were reviewed. Generic, biosimilar, vaccine, and combination medicines were excluded.

EXPOSURES

US Food and Drug Administration approvals were reviewed for therapies categorized as new molecular entities or new active ingredients. German approvals were reviewed from secondary administrative data of authorized medicines that determine availability in Germany, including data presented by the European Medicines Agency.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Approvals were analyzed to determine the percentage of medicines approved and available in the US, Germany, or both countries and compare the times to reach the market.

RESULTS

Analysis of 599 new medicines demonstrated that fewer were available in Germany compared with the US (80% vs 92% of all potential therapies) and that the median difference in time to market was 4 months (95% CI, -44.40 to 44.76 months). Forty-nine medicines were approved in Germany but not in the US, 75% of which were rejected by the US Food and Drug Administration, were withdrawn, or had US equivalent agents.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this cohort study, fewer new medicines were available in Germany compared with the US between 2004 and 2018. In addition, drugs entered the German market later than in the US.

摘要

重要性

德国独特的覆盖范围确定和定价方法确保了有效的药物仍在市场上销售,且价格往往通过谈判降低。然而,对于这种方法在药物初始供应方面的权衡,人们了解得较少。

目的

研究德国和美国新上市药物的时间和范围差异。

设计、设置和参与者:本回顾性队列研究分析了 2004 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 12 月 31 日期间,监管机构在德国和美国批准的新药物的初始供应情况,并随访至 2019 年 12 月 31 日。数据分析于 2020 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 7 月 1 日进行。共审查了 599 种新批准的药物。排除了通用、生物类似物、疫苗和组合药物。

暴露情况

审查了美国食品和药物管理局批准的新分子实体或新活性成分的治疗药物。德国的批准是从授权药物的二级行政数据中审查的,这些数据包括欧洲药品管理局提供的数据,以确定德国的供应情况。

主要结果和措施

分析批准情况以确定在美国、德国或两国都批准和供应的药物的百分比,并比较达到市场的时间。

结果

对 599 种新药物的分析表明,德国的供应情况比美国少(所有潜在疗法中,德国有 80%的药物,而美国有 92%),市场准入时间中位数差异为 4 个月(95%CI,-44.40 至 44.76 个月)。有 49 种药物在德国获得批准但未在美国获得批准,其中 75%的药物被美国食品和药物管理局拒绝、撤回或有美国等效药物。

结论和相关性

在这项队列研究中,2004 年至 2018 年期间,德国新上市药物的数量比美国少。此外,药物进入德国市场的时间晚于美国。