• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

曼恩-肯德尔-斯奈尔斯检验用于识别美国 COVID-19 时间序列的变化点。

The Mann-Kendall-Sneyers test to identify the change points of COVID-19 time series in the United States.

机构信息

Department of Geography, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, 06269, USA.

Institute for Collaboration on Health, Intervention, and Policy (InCHIP), University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, 06269, USA.

出版信息

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Aug 30;22(1):233. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01714-6.

DOI:10.1186/s12874-022-01714-6
PMID:36042407
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9424808/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

One critical variable in the time series analysis is the change point, which is the point where an abrupt change occurs in chronologically ordered observations. Existing parametric models for change point detection, such as the linear regression model and the Bayesian model, require that observations are normally distributed and that the trend line cannot have extreme variability. To overcome the limitations of the parametric model, we apply a nonparametric method, the Mann-Kendall-Sneyers (MKS) test, to change point detection for the state-level COVID-19 case time series data of the United States in the early outbreak of the pandemic.

METHODS

The MKS test is implemented for change point detection. The forward sequence and the backward sequence are calculated based on the new weekly cases between March 22, 2020 and January 31, 2021 for each of the 50 states. Points of intersection between the two sequences falling within the 95% confidence intervals are identified as the change points. The results are compared with two other change point detection methods, the pruned exact linear time (PELT) method and the regression-based method. Also, an open-access tool by Microsoft Excel is developed to facilitate the model implementation.

RESULTS

By applying the MKS test to COVID-19 cases in the United States, we have identified that 30 states (60.0%) have at least one change point within the 95% confidence intervals. Of these states, 26 states have one change point, 4 states (i.e., LA, OH, VA, and WA) have two change points, and one state (GA) has three change points. Additionally, most downward changes appear in the Northeastern states (e.g., CT, MA, NJ, NY) at the first development stage (March 23 through May 31, 2020); most upward changes appear in the Western states (e.g., AZ, CA, CO, NM, WA, WY) and the Midwestern states (e.g., IL, IN, MI, MN, OH, WI) at the third development stage (November 19, 2020 through January 31, 2021).

CONCLUSIONS

This study is among the first to explore the potential of the MKS test applied for change point detection of COVID-19 cases. The MKS test is characterized by several advantages, including high computational efficiency, easy implementation, the ability to identify the change of direction, and no assumption for data distribution. However, due to its conservative nature in change point detection and moderate agreement with other methods, we recommend using the MKS test primarily for initial pattern identification and data pruning, especially in large data. With modification, the method can be further applied to other health data, such as injuries, disabilities, and mortalities.

摘要

背景

时间序列分析中的一个关键变量是变化点,即时间顺序观测值中突然发生变化的点。现有的变化点检测参数模型,如线性回归模型和贝叶斯模型,要求观测值呈正态分布,趋势线不能有极端变化。为了克服参数模型的局限性,我们应用非参数方法,即曼恩-肯德尔-斯尼耶斯(MKS)检验,来检测美国大流行早期的州级 COVID-19 病例时间序列数据的变化点。

方法

应用 MKS 检验进行变化点检测。对于 2020 年 3 月 22 日至 2021 年 1 月 31 日期间每个州的新每周病例数,计算前向序列和后向序列。两个序列之间交点落在 95%置信区间内的点被确定为变化点。结果与另外两种变化点检测方法(修剪精确线性时间(PELT)方法和基于回归的方法)进行比较。此外,还开发了一个 Microsoft Excel 的开放访问工具来方便模型的实施。

结果

通过将 MKS 检验应用于美国的 COVID-19 病例,我们发现 30 个州(60.0%)在 95%置信区间内至少有一个变化点。在这些州中,有 26 个州有一个变化点,有 4 个州(即 LA、OH、VA 和 WA)有两个变化点,有一个州(GA)有三个变化点。此外,大多数下降变化出现在东北部各州(如 CT、MA、NJ、NY)的第一发展阶段(2020 年 3 月 23 日至 5 月 31 日);大多数上升变化出现在西部各州(如 AZ、CA、CO、NM、WA、WY)和中西部各州(如 IL、IN、MI、MN、OH、WI)的第三发展阶段(2020 年 11 月 19 日至 2021 年 1 月 31 日)。

结论

本研究是首次探索 MKS 检验应用于 COVID-19 病例变化点检测的潜力。MKS 检验具有几个优点,包括计算效率高、易于实现、能够识别方向变化以及对数据分布没有假设。然而,由于其在变化点检测中的保守性以及与其他方法的中等一致性,我们建议主要将 MKS 检验用于初始模式识别和数据修剪,尤其是在大数据中。经过修改,该方法可以进一步应用于其他健康数据,如伤害、残疾和死亡。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/037e/9426204/e462f10163b0/12874_2022_1714_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/037e/9426204/563b92b58bd6/12874_2022_1714_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/037e/9426204/20b3f22bf364/12874_2022_1714_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/037e/9426204/43c8aa426317/12874_2022_1714_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/037e/9426204/e462f10163b0/12874_2022_1714_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/037e/9426204/563b92b58bd6/12874_2022_1714_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/037e/9426204/20b3f22bf364/12874_2022_1714_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/037e/9426204/43c8aa426317/12874_2022_1714_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/037e/9426204/e462f10163b0/12874_2022_1714_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The Mann-Kendall-Sneyers test to identify the change points of COVID-19 time series in the United States.曼恩-肯德尔-斯奈尔斯检验用于识别美国 COVID-19 时间序列的变化点。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Aug 30;22(1):233. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01714-6.
2
Hepatitis B time series in Xinjiang, China (2006-2021): change point detection based on the Mann-Kendall-Sneyers test.中国新疆的乙型肝炎时间序列(2006 - 2021年):基于曼-肯德尔-斯奈尔斯检验的变点检测
Math Biosci Eng. 2024 Jan 17;21(2):2458-2469. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2024108.
3
Application of change point analysis to daily influenza-like illness emergency department visits.应用变化点分析于每日流感样疾病急诊就诊。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 Nov-Dec;19(6):1075-81. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000793. Epub 2012 Jul 3.
4
Prediction and Severity Ratings of COVID-19 in the United States.美国 COVID-19 预测和严重程度评级。
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2022 Feb;16(1):262-270. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2020.343. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
5
Analysis of the early COVID-19 epidemic curve in Germany by regression models with change points.基于带有转折点的回归模型分析德国 COVID-19 疫情早期的流行曲线。
Epidemiol Infect. 2021 Mar 11;149:e68. doi: 10.1017/S0950268821000558.
6
Information-Seeking Patterns During the COVID-19 Pandemic Across the United States: Longitudinal Analysis of Google Trends Data.美国新冠疫情期间的信息寻求模式:谷歌趋势数据的纵向分析
J Med Internet Res. 2021 May 3;23(5):e22933. doi: 10.2196/22933.
7
International, national and local trends in the spread of COVID-19: a geographic view of COVID-19 spread and the role to be played by coproduction.COVID-19 的国际、国家和地方传播趋势:COVID-19 传播的地理视角以及共同创作的作用。
8
Dynamic Panel Data Modeling and Surveillance of COVID-19 in Metropolitan Areas in the United States: Longitudinal Trend Analysis.动态面板数据分析与美国大都市地区 COVID-19 的监测:纵向趋势分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 9;23(2):e26081. doi: 10.2196/26081.
9
Public Interest in Immunity and the Justification for Intervention in the Early Stages of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Analysis of Google Trends Data.公众对免疫的关注和在 COVID-19 大流行早期阶段进行干预的正当性:谷歌趋势数据分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jun 18;23(6):e26368. doi: 10.2196/26368.
10
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of four different strategies for SARS-CoV-2 surveillance in the general population (CoV-Surv Study): a structured summary of a study protocol for a cluster-randomised, two-factorial controlled trial.在普通人群中进行 SARS-CoV-2 监测的四种不同策略的有效性和成本效益(CoV-Surv 研究):一项关于集群随机、双因素对照试验的研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Jan 8;22(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04982-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing grassland degradation based on abrupt changes in living status of vegetation in a subalpine meadow.基于亚高山草甸植被生活状态突变评估草地退化
Front Plant Sci. 2025 Aug 12;16:1594772. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1594772. eCollection 2025.
2
Longitudinal host-microbiome dynamics of metatranscription identify hallmarks of progression in periodontitis.宏转录组纵向宿主-微生物群动态揭示牙周炎进展的特征
Microbiome. 2025 May 14;13(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s40168-025-02108-8.
3
Change point detection in brucellosis time series from 2010 to 2023 in Xinjiang China using the BEAST algorithm.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparing Associations of State Reopening Strategies with COVID-19 Burden.比较各州重新开放策略与 COVID-19 负担的关联。
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Dec;35(12):3627-3634. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06277-0. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
2
Pandemic Politics: Timing State-Level Social Distancing Responses to COVID-19.大流行政治:新冠疫情时期的州级社会隔离应对措施的时机选择。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2021 Apr 1;46(2):211-233. doi: 10.1215/03616878-8802162.
3
Statistical procedures for evaluating trends in coronavirus disease-19 cases in the United States.
利用BEAST算法对2010年至2023年中国新疆布鲁氏菌病时间序列进行变点检测。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 30;15(1):3830. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-88508-0.
4
Spatiotemporal analysis of mosquito-borne infections and mosquito vectors in mainland Portugal.葡萄牙大陆蚊媒感染及蚊虫媒介的时空分析
BMC Infect Dis. 2025 Jan 9;25(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-10433-w.
5
National and interprovincial prescribing patterns of JAK-inhibitors in Canada: a repeated cross-sectional analysis.加拿大 JAK 抑制剂的国家和省内处方模式:一项重复的横断面分析。
Clin Rheumatol. 2024 Oct;43(10):3083-3088. doi: 10.1007/s10067-024-07099-9. Epub 2024 Aug 28.
6
Multiple change point analysis of hepatitis B reports in Xinjiang, China from 2006 to 2021.中国新疆地区 2006 年至 2021 年乙型肝炎报告的多变化点分析。
Front Public Health. 2023 Nov 14;11:1223176. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1223176. eCollection 2023.
评估美国新冠肺炎病例趋势的统计程序。
Int J Health Sci (Qassim). 2020 Sep-Oct;14(5):23-31.
4
Timing of State and Territorial COVID-19 Stay-at-Home Orders and Changes in Population Movement - United States, March 1-May 31, 2020.美国 2020 年 3 月 1 日至 5 月 31 日各州和领地新冠疫情“居家令”发布时间及人口流动变化情况
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Sep 4;69(35):1198-1203. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6935a2.
5
Bayesian inference of COVID-19 spreading rates in South Africa.南非 COVID-19 传播率的贝叶斯推断。
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 5;15(8):e0237126. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237126. eCollection 2020.
6
The effect of social distance measures on COVID-19 epidemics in Europe: an interrupted time series analysis.社会距离措施对欧洲 COVID-19 疫情的影响:一项中断时间序列分析。
Geroscience. 2020 Aug;42(4):1075-1082. doi: 10.1007/s11357-020-00205-0. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
7
Inferring change points in the spread of COVID-19 reveals the effectiveness of interventions.推断 COVID-19 传播中的变化点可揭示干预措施的效果。
Science. 2020 Jul 10;369(6500). doi: 10.1126/science.abb9789. Epub 2020 May 15.
8
An Analytical Framework for Integrating the Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Environmental Context and Individual Mobility in Exposure Assessment: A Study on the Relationship between Food Environment Exposures and Body Weight.环境上下文和个体移动性时空动态整合的分析框架在暴露评估中的应用:食品环境暴露与体重关系的研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Sep 15;15(9):2022. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15092022.