Crengle Sue, Davie Gabrielle, Whitehead Jesse, de Graaf Brandon, Lawrenson Ross, Nixon Garry
(Kāi Tahu, Kāti Māmoe, Waitaha) PhD. Ngāi Tahu Māori Health Research Unit, Division of Health Sciences, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand.
Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand.
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2022 Aug 18;28:100570. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2022.100570. eCollection 2022 Nov.
Previous research identified inequities in all-cause mortality between Māori and non-Māori populations. Unlike comparable jurisdictions, mortality rates in rural areas have not been shown to be higher than those in urban areas for either population. This paper uses contemporary mortality data to examine Māori and non-Māori mortality rates in rural and urban areas.
A population-level observational study using deidentified routinely collected all-cause mortality, amenable mortality and census data. For each level of the Geographic Classification for Health (GCH), Māori and non-Māori age-sex standardised all-cause mortality and amenable mortality incident rates, Māori:Non-Māori standardised incident rate ratios and Māori rural:urban standardised incident rate ratios were calculated. Age and deprivation stratified rates and rate ratios were also calculated.
Compared to non-Māori, Māori experience excess all-cause (SIRR 1.87 urban; 1.95 rural) and amenable mortality (SIRR 2.45 urban; 2.34 rural) and in all five levels of the GCH. Rural Māori experience greater all-cause (SIRR 1.07) and amenable (SIRR 1.13) mortality than their urban peers. Māori and non-Māori all-cause and amenable mortality rates increased as rurality increased.
The excess Māori all-cause mortality across the rural: urban spectrum is consistent with existing literature documenting other Māori health inequities. A similar but more pronounced pattern of inequities is observed for amenable mortality that reflects ethnic differences in access to, and quality of, health care. The excess all-cause and amenable mortality experienced by rural Māori, compared to their urban counterparts, suggests that there are additional challenges associated with living rurally.
This work was funded by the Health Research Council of New Zealand (HRC19/488).
先前的研究发现毛利人和非毛利人群在全因死亡率方面存在不平等现象。与可比司法管辖区不同,无论是哪个群体,农村地区的死亡率均未高于城市地区。本文利用当代死亡率数据来研究农村和城市地区毛利人和非毛利人的死亡率。
一项基于人群的观察性研究,使用经过去识别处理的常规收集的全因死亡率、可避免死亡率和人口普查数据。针对健康地理分类(GCH)的每个级别,计算毛利人和非毛利人的年龄性别标准化全因死亡率和可避免死亡率发病率、毛利人:非毛利人标准化发病率比以及毛利人农村:城市标准化发病率比。还计算了年龄和贫困分层率及率比。
与非毛利人相比,毛利人在全因死亡率(城市地区标准化发病率比为1.87;农村地区为1.95)和可避免死亡率(城市地区标准化发病率比为2.45;农村地区为2.34)方面存在超额情况,且在GCH的所有五个级别中均如此。农村毛利人比城市同龄人经历更高的全因死亡率(标准化发病率比为1.07)和可避免死亡率(标准化发病率比为1.13)。随着农村程度的增加,毛利人和非毛利人的全因死亡率和可避免死亡率均上升。
毛利人在农村与城市范围内的全因死亡率超额情况与记录其他毛利人健康不平等现象的现有文献一致。在可避免死亡率方面观察到类似但更明显的不平等模式,这反映了在获得医疗保健的机会和质量方面的种族差异。与城市毛利人相比,农村毛利人经历的全因死亡率和可避免死亡率超额表明,农村生活存在额外挑战。
这项工作由新西兰健康研究委员会资助(HRC19/488)。