Centre of Rural Health, Department of General Practice and Rural Health, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Int J Equity Health. 2024 Sep 18;23(1):188. doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02261-w.
This scoping review aims to understand the extent and attributes of literature evaluating differences between rural and urban populations' utilization of health services in upper-middle and high-income countries.
The review was conducted in line with established scoping review methodology guidelines. We used the "Participants, Concept and Context" framework to guide the inclusion criteria and determination of the review's scope. Studies published over a 15-year period (2008-2022) were identified using Embase, Medine, PubMed, and Scopus databases. Study attributes, areas of focus and findings were reviewed and extracted.
The search identified 179 studies. The number of studies published looking at rural-urban differences in health service utilization has increased over time. The focus of these studies is relatively evenly split between primary and secondary sectors. The majority of studies observed less service utilization by rural populations than urban-especially so in primary-sector services. When higher rural utilization of secondary services was observed this was frequently attributed to poor access to other services that would have had the potential to mitigate the secondary demand. Studies were not commonly grounded in principles of equity or fairness and rarely offered value judgements on observed differences in utilization. There were limited system-level studies - the vast majority being disease- or service-specific analyses. We consider this a notable gap in the literature.
This scoping review identifies key parameters of studies on rural-urban variation in health service utilization. The finding that most studies observed rural populations utilized comparatively less services is concerning, in the context of general evidence about high levels of health need in rural communities. Future system-level research considering the combined variations in need and utilization appears a priority.
本范围综述旨在了解中上收入和高收入国家中农村和城市人群利用卫生服务的差异的文献的广度和特征。
该综述按照既定的范围综述方法指南进行。我们使用“参与者、概念和背景”框架来指导纳入标准和确定综述范围。使用 Embase、Medline、PubMed 和 Scopus 数据库,确定了在过去 15 年(2008-2022 年)发表的研究。综述和提取了研究属性、关注领域和发现。
搜索确定了 179 项研究。随着时间的推移,研究数量增加,观察到农村-城市卫生服务利用差异的研究数量增加。这些研究的重点相对平均地分布在初级和二级部门。大多数研究观察到农村人群的服务利用率低于城市人群,特别是在初级部门服务中。当观察到农村地区对二级服务的利用率较高时,这通常归因于获得其他服务的机会较差,这些服务有可能减轻二级需求。研究通常没有以公平或公正的原则为基础,也很少对观察到的利用差异进行价值判断。很少有系统层面的研究——绝大多数是疾病或服务特定的分析。我们认为这是文献中的一个显著差距。
本范围综述确定了农村-城市卫生服务利用差异研究的关键参数。大多数研究观察到农村人群的服务利用率较低,这令人担忧,因为一般证据表明农村社区的健康需求水平很高。未来考虑需求和利用综合变化的系统层面研究似乎是当务之急。