• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

夫妻日常生活中快速与慢速共情感知使用不同线索。

Fast and Slow Empathic Perceptions in Couples' Daily Lives Use Different Cues.

作者信息

Sened Haran, Bar-Kalifa Eran, Pshedetzky-Shochat Rony, Gleason Marci, Rafaeli Eshkol

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel.

Department of Psychology, Ben Gurion University, Be'er Sheva, Israel.

出版信息

Affect Sci. 2020 Apr 17;1(2):87-96. doi: 10.1007/s42761-020-00006-w. eCollection 2020 Jun.

DOI:10.1007/s42761-020-00006-w
PMID:36042967
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9382916/
Abstract

, the ability to infer another person's emotions, thoughts, and other fleeting mental states, has been linked to (wherein the perceiver assumes that another person's mental states are similar to their own) and (wherein the perceiver uses various external cues to reach their judgment). Previous research has linked this component model, as well as dual process models, to neuroscientific models of empathy, but has not linked these components with dual process accounts directly. Thus, we examined whether assumed similarity involves rapid (type-1) processing while direct accuracy involves slower (type-2) inferences. In three dyadic daily diary samples (total  = 262 romantic couples), we examined associations between both components and response times. As expected, direct accuracy, but not assumed similarity, was associated with slower response times. Our findings suggest links between previously disparate lines of research and identify situations which may tip the balance between the empathic components.

摘要

推断他人情绪、思想及其他短暂心理状态的能力,已与投射(其中感知者假定他人的心理状态与自己相似)和直接准确性(其中感知者使用各种外部线索来做出判断)相关联。先前的研究已将此成分模型以及双加工模型与共情的神经科学模型联系起来,但尚未将这些成分与双加工理论直接联系起来。因此,我们研究了假定相似性是否涉及快速(1型)加工,而直接准确性是否涉及较慢(2型)推理。在三个二元日常日记样本(总共 = 262对浪漫情侣)中,我们研究了这两个成分与反应时间之间的关联。正如预期的那样,直接准确性而非假定相似性与较慢的反应时间相关。我们的研究结果表明了先前不同研究路线之间的联系,并确定了可能影响共情成分之间平衡的情况。

相似文献

1
Fast and Slow Empathic Perceptions in Couples' Daily Lives Use Different Cues.夫妻日常生活中快速与慢速共情感知使用不同线索。
Affect Sci. 2020 Apr 17;1(2):87-96. doi: 10.1007/s42761-020-00006-w. eCollection 2020 Jun.
2
Couples' Perceptions of Each Other's Daily Affect: Empathic Accuracy, Assumed Similarity, and Indirect Accuracy.夫妻双方对彼此日常情绪的感知:共情准确性、假设相似性和间接准确性。
Fam Process. 2019 Mar;58(1):179-196. doi: 10.1111/famp.12344. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
3
Overcoming Barriers to Physical Activity in People with Osteoarthritis: the Role of Empathic Accuracy in Couples' Planning Discussions.克服骨关节炎患者身体活动障碍:夫妻计划讨论中同理心准确性的作用。
Int J Behav Med. 2020 Apr;27(2):235-246. doi: 10.1007/s12529-020-09856-x.
4
Eye of the beholder: the individual and dyadic contributions of empathic accuracy and perceived empathic effort to relationship satisfaction.旁观者之眼:共情准确性和感知共情努力对关系满意度的个体和对偶贡献。
J Fam Psychol. 2012 Apr;26(2):236-45. doi: 10.1037/a0027488. Epub 2012 Feb 27.
5
Now you have my attention: Empathic accuracy pathways in couples and the role of conflict.现在你引起了我的注意:夫妻之间共情准确性的途径以及冲突的作用。
Emotion. 2017 Feb;17(1):155-168. doi: 10.1037/emo0000220. Epub 2016 Aug 25.
6
Is Empathic Accuracy Enough to Facilitate Responsive Behavior in Dyadic Interaction? Distinguishing Ability From Motivation.同理心准确性足以促进对偶互动中的响应行为吗?区分能力和动机。
Psychol Sci. 2016 Mar;27(3):394-404. doi: 10.1177/0956797615624491. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
7
Depression and empathic accuracy in couples: an interpersonal model of gender differences in depression.夫妻中的抑郁和共情准确性:抑郁的性别差异的人际模型。
Psychol Sci. 2011 Aug;22(8):1033-41. doi: 10.1177/0956797611414728. Epub 2011 Jul 7.
8
Expressing thoughts and feelings leads to greater empathic accuracy during relationship conflict.表达想法和感受会导致在关系冲突中更准确地共情。
J Fam Psychol. 2021 Dec;35(8):1199-1205. doi: 10.1037/fam0000871. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
9
Everyday empathic accuracy in younger and older couples: do you need to see your partner to know his or her feelings?年轻夫妻和老年夫妻日常共情准确性:是否需要看到伴侣才能了解其感受?
Psychol Sci. 2013 Nov 1;24(11):2210-7. doi: 10.1177/0956797613490747. Epub 2013 Sep 6.
10
Reading between the minds: the use of stereotypes in empathic accuracy.读心术:刻板印象在同理心准确性中的应用。
Psychol Sci. 2012 Sep 1;23(9):1040-6. doi: 10.1177/0956797612439719. Epub 2012 Aug 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Messenger-based assessment of empathic accuracy in couples' smartphone communication.基于信使的夫妻智能手机沟通中移情准确性评估
BMC Psychol. 2025 Feb 21;13(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02483-9.
2
Egocentric Projection is a Rational Strategy for Accurate Emotion Prediction.自我中心投射是准确情绪预测的一种合理策略。
J Exp Soc Psychol. 2023 Nov;109. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2023.104521. Epub 2023 Aug 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Mom-and-Pop Narcissism: The Impact of Attention Seeking and Grandiosity on Couples' Experience of the Transition to Parenthood.夫妻型自恋:寻求关注和浮夸对夫妻过渡到为人父母体验的影响。
J Pers Disord. 2020 Aug;34(4):499-518. doi: 10.1521/pedi_2019_33_442. Epub 2019 Aug 12.
2
Couples' Perceptions of Each Other's Daily Affect: Empathic Accuracy, Assumed Similarity, and Indirect Accuracy.夫妻双方对彼此日常情绪的感知:共情准确性、假设相似性和间接准确性。
Fam Process. 2019 Mar;58(1):179-196. doi: 10.1111/famp.12344. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
3
Repeated Measures Correlation.重复测量相关性
Front Psychol. 2017 Apr 7;8:456. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00456. eCollection 2017.
4
Empathic accuracy and relationship satisfaction: A meta-analytic review.共情准确性与关系满意度:一项元分析综述。
J Fam Psychol. 2017 Sep;31(6):742-752. doi: 10.1037/fam0000320. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
5
Degrees of Freedom in Planning, Running, Analyzing, and Reporting Psychological Studies: A Checklist to Avoid -Hacking.心理研究的规划、实施、分析和报告中的自由度:避免“操作”的清单。
Front Psychol. 2016 Nov 25;7:1832. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01832. eCollection 2016.
6
Now you have my attention: Empathic accuracy pathways in couples and the role of conflict.现在你引起了我的注意:夫妻之间共情准确性的途径以及冲突的作用。
Emotion. 2017 Feb;17(1):155-168. doi: 10.1037/emo0000220. Epub 2016 Aug 25.
7
Trust your gut or think carefully? Examining whether an intuitive, versus a systematic, mode of thought produces greater empathic accuracy.相信直觉还是深思熟虑?探究直觉思维与系统思维哪种方式更能提高同理心准确性。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2016 Nov;111(5):674-685. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000063. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
8
Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition: Advancing the Debate.双重加工理论的高阶认知:推进辩论。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2013 May;8(3):223-41. doi: 10.1177/1745691612460685.
9
The Mere Co-Presence: Synchronization of Autonomic Signals and Emotional Responses across Co-Present Individuals Not Engaged in Direct Interaction.单纯的共同在场:未进行直接互动的共同在场个体之间自主信号与情绪反应的同步。
PLoS One. 2015 May 27;10(5):e0125804. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125804. eCollection 2015.
10
The busy social brain: evidence for automaticity and control in the neural systems supporting social cognition and action understanding.忙碌的社会大脑:支持社会认知和动作理解的神经系统中的自动性和控制的证据。
Psychol Sci. 2013 Jan 1;24(1):80-6. doi: 10.1177/0956797612450884. Epub 2012 Dec 6.