• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者对骶骨固定术或改良曼彻斯特手术的偏好:一项离散选择实验。

Patient's preference for sacrospinous hysteropexy or modified Manchester operation: A discrete choice experiment.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BJOG. 2023 Jan;130(1):99-106. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17280. Epub 2022 Aug 31.

DOI:10.1111/1471-0528.17280
PMID:36043332
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10087824/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate women's preference for modified Manchester (MM) or sacrospinous hysteropexy (SH) as surgery for uterine prolapse.

DESIGN

Labelled discrete choice experiment (DCE).

SETTING

Eight Dutch hospitals.

POPULATION

Women with uterine prolapse, eligible for primary surgery and preference for uterus preservation.

METHODS

DCEs are attribute-based surveys. The two treatment options were labelled as MM and SH. Attributes in this survey were treatment success ( levels SH: 84%, 89%, 94%; levels MM: 89%, 93%, 96%), dyspareunia (levels: 0%, 5%, 10%), cervical stenosis (levels: 1%, 6%, 11%) and severe buttock pain (levels: 0%, 1%). A different combination of attribute levels was used in each choice set. Women completed nine choice sets, making a choice based on attribute levels. Data were analysed in multinomial logit models.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Women's preference for MM or SH.

RESULTS

137 DCEs were completed (1233 choice sets). SH was chosen in 49% of the choice sets, MM in 51%. Of all women, 39 (28%) always chose the same surgery. After exclusion of this group, 882 choice sets were analysed, in which women preferred MM, likely associated with a labelling effect, i.e. description of the procedure, rather than the tested attributes. In that group, MM was chosen in 53% of the choice sets and SH in 47%. When choosing MM, next to the label, dyspareunia was relevant for decision-making. For SH, all attributes were relevant for decision-making.

CONCLUSIONS

The preference of women for MM or SH seems almost equally divided. The variety in preference supports the importance of individualised healthcare.

摘要

目的

调查女性对改良式曼彻斯特(MM)或骶骨固定术(SH)作为子宫脱垂手术的偏好。

设计

标记离散选择实验(DCE)。

设置

八家荷兰医院。

人群

患有子宫脱垂、适合初次手术且保留子宫偏好的女性。

方法

DCE 是基于属性的调查。两种治疗方法分别标记为 MM 和 SH。该调查中的属性包括治疗成功率(SH 水平:84%、89%、94%;MM 水平:89%、93%、96%)、性交困难(水平:0%、5%、10%)、宫颈狭窄(水平:1%、6%、11%)和严重臀部疼痛(水平:0%、1%)。在每个选择集中使用了不同的属性水平组合。女性完成了九个选择集,根据属性水平做出选择。数据在多项逻辑回归模型中进行分析。

主要观察指标

女性对 MM 或 SH 的偏好。

结果

完成了 137 项 DCE(1233 个选择集)。在 49%的选择集中选择了 SH,在 51%的选择集中选择了 MM。所有女性中,有 39 人(28%)始终选择相同的手术。排除该组后,分析了 882 个选择集,在这些选择集中,女性更喜欢 MM,这可能与标签效应相关,即手术过程的描述,而不是测试的属性。在该组中,在 53%的选择集中选择了 MM,在 47%的选择集中选择了 SH。当选择 MM 时,除了标签外,性交困难也是决策的相关因素。对于 SH,所有属性都是决策的相关因素。

结论

女性对 MM 或 SH 的偏好似乎几乎平分秋色。这种偏好的多样性支持了个性化医疗的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3234/10087824/8bf49079d453/BJO-130-99-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3234/10087824/8bf49079d453/BJO-130-99-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3234/10087824/8bf49079d453/BJO-130-99-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Patient's preference for sacrospinous hysteropexy or modified Manchester operation: A discrete choice experiment.患者对骶骨固定术或改良曼彻斯特手术的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
BJOG. 2023 Jan;130(1):99-106. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17280. Epub 2022 Aug 31.
2
Do patients prefer mesh or anterior colporrhaphy for primary correction of anterior vaginal wall prolapse: a labelled discrete choice experiment.在原发性阴道前壁脱垂矫正中,患者更倾向于使用网片还是前路阴道修补术:一项标记离散选择实验。
BJOG. 2015 May;122(6):873-880. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12924. Epub 2014 Jul 7.
3
Manchester Procedure vs Sacrospinous Hysteropexy for Treatment of Uterine Descent: A Randomized Clinical Trial.曼彻斯特手术与骶棘韧带固定术治疗子宫脱垂的随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2023 Aug 15;330(7):626-635. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.13140.
4
The Impact of Sacrospinous Hysteropexy and Vaginal Hysterectomy With Suspension of the Uterosacral Ligaments on Sexual Function in Women With Uterine Prolapse: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Comparative Study.骶棘韧带子宫固定术及阴道子宫切除术联合子宫骶韧带悬吊术对子宫脱垂女性性功能的影响:一项随机对照研究的二次分析
J Sex Med. 2016 Feb;13(2):213-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2015.12.006. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
5
Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial.骶棘韧带子宫固定术与子宫骶骨韧带悬吊的阴道子宫切除术治疗2期及以上子宫脱垂女性的多中心随机非劣效性试验
BMJ. 2015 Jul 23;351:h3717. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h3717.
6
Gynecologists' perspectives on two types of uterus-preserving surgical repair of uterine descent; sacrospinous hysteropexy versus modified Manchester.妇科医生对子宫脱垂两种保留子宫手术修复方式的看法:骶棘韧带子宫固定术与改良曼彻斯特手术对比
Int Urogynecol J. 2021 Apr;32(4):835-840. doi: 10.1007/s00192-020-04568-y. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
7
Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: observational follow-up of a multicentre randomised trial.骶棘韧带固定术与阴道子宫切除术联合子宫骶骨韧带悬吊术治疗 2 度或以上子宫脱垂的疗效比较:多中心随机试验的随访观察。
BMJ. 2019 Sep 10;366:l5149. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l5149.
8
Evaluation of two vaginal, uterus sparing operations for pelvic organ prolapse: modified Manchester operation (MM) and sacrospinous hysteropexy (SSH), a study protocol for a multicentre randomized non-inferiority trial (the SAM study).两种保留阴道和子宫的盆腔器官脱垂手术的评估:改良曼彻斯特手术(MM)和骶棘韧带子宫固定术(SSH),一项多中心随机非劣效性试验的研究方案(SAM研究)
BMC Womens Health. 2019 Apr 2;19(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12905-019-0749-7.
9
Factors influencing women's preferences for subsequent management in the event of incomplete evacuation of the uterus after misoprostol treatment for miscarriage.米索前列醇治疗流产后宫内组织物残留后影响女性对进一步处理选择偏好的因素。
Hum Reprod. 2017 Aug 1;32(8):1674-1683. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex216.
10
Women's preferences for attributes of first-trimester miscarriage management: a stated preference discrete-choice experiment.女性对孕早期流产管理属性的偏好:一项陈述偏好离散选择实验
Value Health. 2009 Jun;12(4):551-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00459.x. Epub 2008 Sep 16.

引用本文的文献

1
The Evolving Landscape of Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Systematic Review.健康经济学中离散选择实验的发展态势:一项系统综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 May 21. doi: 10.1007/s40273-025-01495-y.
2
Determinants of women's preferences for surgical versus conservative management for pelvic organ prolapse: a survey-based study from Italy.女性对盆腔器官脱垂行手术与保守治疗偏好的决定因素:来自意大利的一项基于调查的研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jul 24;14(7):e084034. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084034.
3
The Outcomes of the Manchester Procedure Versus Sacrospinous Ligament Hysteropexy for Uterine Prolapse: A Study of the British Society of Urogynaecology Database.

本文引用的文献

1
Endometrial cancer after the Manchester procedure: a nationwide cohort study.曼彻斯特手术后的子宫内膜癌:一项全国性队列研究。
Int Urogynecol J. 2022 Jul;33(7):1881-1888. doi: 10.1007/s00192-022-05196-4. Epub 2022 Apr 13.
2
Practice pattern variation: treatment of pelvic organ prolapse in The Netherlands.实践模式的差异:荷兰盆腔器官脱垂的治疗方法。
Int Urogynecol J. 2022 Jul;33(7):1973-1980. doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-04968-8. Epub 2021 Sep 6.
3
Pelvic organ prolapse after laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with vaginal hysterectomy: the POP-UP study.
曼彻斯特手术与骶棘韧带悬吊带术治疗子宫脱垂的结局比较:英国泌尿妇科协会数据库研究。
Int Urogynecol J. 2024 Jul;35(7):1469-1475. doi: 10.1007/s00192-024-05826-z. Epub 2024 Jun 7.
4
Patient Impression of Improvement 1 year After Sacrospinous Hysteropexy Versus Vaginal Hysterectomy in Women with Pelvic Organ Prolapse Stage 2 or Higher.患者对骶骨固定术与阴道子宫切除术治疗 2 期或更高阶段盆腔器官脱垂的改善 1 年的印象。
Int Urogynecol J. 2024 May;35(5):985-993. doi: 10.1007/s00192-024-05750-2. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
5
Manchester Procedure vs Sacrospinous Hysteropexy for Treatment of Uterine Descent: A Randomized Clinical Trial.曼彻斯特手术与骶棘韧带固定术治疗子宫脱垂的随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2023 Aug 15;330(7):626-635. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.13140.
6
Regional practice variation in pelvic organ prolapse surgery in Tuscany, Italy: a retrospective cohort study on administrative health data.意大利托斯卡纳地区盆腔器官脱垂手术的区域实践差异:基于行政健康数据的回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 7;13(3):e068145. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068145.
腹腔镜子宫切除术与阴道子宫切除术治疗盆腔器官脱垂的比较:POP-UP 研究。
Int Urogynecol J. 2021 Apr;32(4):841-850. doi: 10.1007/s00192-020-04591-z. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
4
Gynecologists' perspectives on two types of uterus-preserving surgical repair of uterine descent; sacrospinous hysteropexy versus modified Manchester.妇科医生对子宫脱垂两种保留子宫手术修复方式的看法:骶棘韧带子宫固定术与改良曼彻斯特手术对比
Int Urogynecol J. 2021 Apr;32(4):835-840. doi: 10.1007/s00192-020-04568-y. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
5
Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: observational follow-up of a multicentre randomised trial.骶棘韧带固定术与阴道子宫切除术联合子宫骶骨韧带悬吊术治疗 2 度或以上子宫脱垂的疗效比较:多中心随机试验的随访观察。
BMJ. 2019 Sep 10;366:l5149. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l5149.
6
Evaluation of two vaginal, uterus sparing operations for pelvic organ prolapse: modified Manchester operation (MM) and sacrospinous hysteropexy (SSH), a study protocol for a multicentre randomized non-inferiority trial (the SAM study).两种保留阴道和子宫的盆腔器官脱垂手术的评估:改良曼彻斯特手术(MM)和骶棘韧带子宫固定术(SSH),一项多中心随机非劣效性试验的研究方案(SAM研究)
BMC Womens Health. 2019 Apr 2;19(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12905-019-0749-7.
7
The Internal Validity of Discrete Choice Experiment Data: A Testing Tool for Quantitative Assessments.离散选择实验数据的内部有效性:一种用于定量评估的测试工具。
Value Health. 2019 Feb;22(2):157-160. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.07.876. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
8
Trends in prolapse surgery in England.英国脱垂手术的趋势。
Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Nov;29(11):1689-1695. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3731-2. Epub 2018 Aug 4.
9
The Manchester procedure: anatomical, subjective and sexual outcomes.曼彻斯特手术:解剖学、主观及性功能方面的结果。
Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Aug;29(8):1193-1201. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3622-6. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
10
Uterine preservation vs hysterectomy in pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines.子宫保留与子宫切除术在盆腔器官脱垂手术中的比较:系统评价与荟萃分析及临床实践指南。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Aug;219(2):129-146.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.01.018. Epub 2018 Jan 17.