• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性胆囊炎严重程度(东京 2018 指南)是否影响早期或延迟胆囊切除术的决策?

Should the severity of acute cholecystitis (Tokyo 2018 guideline) affect the decision of early or delayed cholecystectomy?

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Kayseri City Hospital, Kayseri-Türkiye.

出版信息

Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2022 Sep;28(9):1305-1311. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2021.50241.

DOI:10.14744/tjtes.2021.50241
PMID:36043925
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10315959/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In our study, we aimed to compare the complication rates of patients presenting with acute cholecystitis and undergoing surgery at the time of hospitalization (early cholecystectomy) and delayed cholecystectomy and also to examine whether the severity of cholecystitis has an effect on the timing of cholecystectomy.

METHODS

The study was planned retrospectively and the approval of the ethics committee of our hospital was obtained. The patient files of the patients who were admitted to our tertiary hospital with acute cholecystitis were accessed through the hospital archive system. The patients were divided into two groups, those who were admitted to the emergency department for acute chole-cystitis and who underwent early cholecystectomy and delayed cholecystectomy. The Tokyo 2018 acute cholecystitis guideline was used to determine the severity of acute cholecystitis. Pre-operative and post-operative data of the patients were examined and their complications were evaluated.

RESULTS

The data of 158 patients who met the inclusion criteria were retrospectively analyzed. Compared with delayed chole-cystectomy, complication rates increased in patients who underwent early cholecystectomy (8.1% and 32.2%, respectively, p<0.001). According to the Tokyo 2018 guideline, patients with acute cholecystitis were grouped as Tokyo 1, 2, and 3; and of Tokyo 1 patients, more complications were observed in those who underwent early cholecystectomy (22.6% and 4.2%, respectively, p=0.004). When the complications were examined, it was observed that pulmonary embolism, pneumonia, intra-abdominal abscess development, sepsis, and wound infection were significantly higher in those who were operated early. When the factors affecting complications are examined, having a Tokyo score of 2 and above (OR: 4.161), high creatinine levels (OR: 5.496), and presence of additional disease (OR: 4.238) increase the risk of developing complications.

CONCLUSION

More complications occur after cholecystectomy in patients with Tokyo 2 and above, when compared with patients with Tokyo 1. It was observed that more complications developed in patients with Tokyo 1 cholecystitis who were operated in the early period. Further studies are needed to determine the effect of acute cholecystitis severity in determining the timing of cholecystectomy.

摘要

背景

在我们的研究中,我们旨在比较在住院时(早期胆囊切除术)和延迟胆囊切除术后出现急性胆囊炎并接受手术的患者的并发症发生率,并检查胆囊炎的严重程度是否对胆囊切除术的时间产生影响。

方法

本研究计划采用回顾性方法进行,并获得了我院伦理委员会的批准。通过医院档案系统访问了因急性胆囊炎入院的患者的病历。将患者分为两组,一组因急性胆囊炎入住急诊科并接受早期胆囊切除术,另一组接受延迟胆囊切除术。使用 2018 年东京急性胆囊炎指南确定急性胆囊炎的严重程度。检查患者的术前和术后数据并评估其并发症。

结果

回顾性分析了符合纳入标准的 158 名患者的数据。与延迟胆囊切除术相比,早期胆囊切除术患者的并发症发生率更高(分别为 8.1%和 32.2%,p<0.001)。根据 2018 年东京指南,将急性胆囊炎患者分为东京 1 型、2 型和 3 型;在东京 1 型患者中,早期胆囊切除术的患者并发症更多(分别为 22.6%和 4.2%,p=0.004)。在检查并发症时,发现早期手术的患者肺栓塞、肺炎、腹腔脓肿形成、脓毒症和伤口感染的发生率明显更高。在检查影响并发症的因素时,发现东京评分 2 分及以上(OR:4.161)、肌酐水平升高(OR:5.496)和合并症(OR:4.238)会增加发生并发症的风险。

结论

与东京 1 型患者相比,东京 2 分及以上的患者胆囊切除术后发生的并发症更多。在早期接受手术的东京 1 型胆囊炎患者中,观察到更多的并发症发生。需要进一步研究来确定急性胆囊炎严重程度对胆囊切除术时机的影响。

相似文献

1
Should the severity of acute cholecystitis (Tokyo 2018 guideline) affect the decision of early or delayed cholecystectomy?急性胆囊炎严重程度(东京 2018 指南)是否影响早期或延迟胆囊切除术的决策?
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2022 Sep;28(9):1305-1311. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2021.50241.
2
Operative complications and economic outcomes of cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.胆囊炎行胆囊切除术的手术并发症和经济结局。
World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Dec 28;25(48):6916-6927. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i48.6916.
3
Primary admission to a surgical service facilitates early cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis but does not influence patient outcome.初次入住外科病房有助于急性胆囊炎患者早期行胆囊切除术,但不影响患者预后。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Jun 5;408(1):225. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-02957-7.
4
Effect of Early Versus Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy on Postoperative Morbidity and Difficult Cholecystectomy in Patients With Grade II Cholecystitis According to Tokyo 2018 Guidelines: A Prospective Study.根据 2018 年东京指南,早期与延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗Ⅱ级胆囊炎患者术后并发症和困难性胆囊切除术的效果:一项前瞻性研究。
Am Surg. 2023 Dec;89(12):5775-5781. doi: 10.1177/00031348231175113. Epub 2023 May 9.
5
The optimal treatment of patients with mild and moderate acute cholecystitis: time for a revision of the Tokyo Guidelines.轻度和中度急性胆囊炎患者的最佳治疗方法:是时候修订东京指南了。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Oct;31(10):3858-3863. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5412-x. Epub 2017 Jan 26.
6
Comparison of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in aged acute calculous cholecystitis: a cohort study.老年急性结石性胆囊炎行腹腔镜胆囊切除术与延期腹腔镜胆囊切除术的比较:一项队列研究。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Jul;34(7):2994-3001. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07091-4. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
7
Outcomes of early cholecystectomy (within 7 days of admission) for acute cholecystitis according to diagnosis and severity grading by Tokyo 2013 Guideline.根据《2013年东京指南》的诊断和严重程度分级,急性胆囊炎早期胆囊切除术(入院7天内)的结果。
Turk J Surg. 2017 Jun 1;33(2):80-86. doi: 10.5152/UCD.2016.3305. eCollection 2017.
8
Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for lithiasic acute cholecystitis during emergency admissions. Results of a monocentric experience and review of the literature.急诊入院时针对结石性急性胆囊炎的早期与延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术。单中心经验及文献综述结果
Tunis Med. 2016 Aug-Sep;94(8-9):519-524.
9
Acute cholecystitis: comparing clinical outcomes with TG13 severity and intended laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy in difficult operative cases.急性胆囊炎:比较 TG13 严重程度与困难手术中腹腔镜与开腹胆囊切除术的临床结局。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Sep;32(9):3943-3948. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6134-z. Epub 2018 Mar 9.
10
Tokyo Guidelines 2013 may be too restrictive and patients with moderate and severe acute cholecystitis can be managed by early cholecystectomy too.《2013东京指南》可能限制过多,中度和重度急性胆囊炎患者也可通过早期胆囊切除术进行治疗。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Jul;31(7):2892-2900. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5300-4. Epub 2016 Nov 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of surgical timing on postoperative quality of life in acute cholecystitis: a comparative analysis of early, intermediate, and delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy.手术时机对急性胆囊炎术后生活质量的影响:早期、中期和延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术的比较分析
Surg Endosc. 2025 Apr;39(4):2489-2497. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11620-9. Epub 2025 Feb 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating the advantages of treating acute cholecystitis by following the Tokyo Guidelines 2018 (TG18): a study emphasizing clinical outcomes and medical expenditures.评估遵循《2018年东京指南》(TG18)治疗急性胆囊炎的优势:一项强调临床结局和医疗支出的研究。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Dec;35(12):6623-6632. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08162-7. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
2
Operative complications and economic outcomes of cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.胆囊炎行胆囊切除术的手术并发症和经济结局。
World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Dec 28;25(48):6916-6927. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i48.6916.
3
Optimum timing of emergency cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis in England: population-based cohort study.英格兰急性胆囊炎行急诊胆囊切除术的最佳时机:基于人群的队列研究。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Aug;33(8):2495-2502. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6537-x. Epub 2019 Apr 4.
4
OUTCOME OF LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY IN PATIENTS WITH GALLSTONE DISEASE AT A SECONDARY LEVEL CARE HOSPITAL.二级护理医院中胆结石病患者腹腔镜胆囊切除术的结果
Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2018 Jun 21;31(1):e1347. doi: 10.1590/0102-672020180001e1347.
5
Outcomes of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis performed at a single institution.在单一机构进行的早期与延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎的疗效
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2019 Jan;12(1):74-80. doi: 10.1111/ases.12487. Epub 2018 Apr 3.
6
Tokyo Guidelines 2018: diagnostic criteria and severity grading of acute cholecystitis (with videos).东京指南 2018:急性胆囊炎的诊断标准与严重程度分级(附视频)。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2018 Jan;25(1):41-54. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.515. Epub 2018 Jan 9.
7
[Potential risk factors for postoperative complications and deaths after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the elderly].[老年人腹腔镜胆囊切除术后并发症及死亡的潜在危险因素]
Nihon Shokakibyo Gakkai Zasshi. 2017;114(9):1649-1657. doi: 10.11405/nisshoshi.114.1649.
8
Subtotal laparoscopic cholecystectomy influences the rate of conversion in patients with difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Case series.腹腔镜胆囊次全切除术对困难腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者的中转率的影响:病例系列研究
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2017 May 25;19:19-22. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2017.04.018. eCollection 2017 Jul.
9
Optimal time for early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.急性胆囊炎行早期腹腔镜胆囊切除术的最佳时机。
JAMA Surg. 2015 Feb;150(2):129-36. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.2339.
10
Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for people with acute cholecystitis.急性胆囊炎患者早期与延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jun 30(6):CD005440. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005440.pub3.