• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非瓣膜性心房颤动患者接受口服抗凝剂治疗的风险水平和不良临床结局。

Risk Levels and Adverse Clinical Outcomes Among Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Receiving Oral Anticoagulants.

机构信息

Liverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Liverpool and Liverpool Heart & Chest Hospital, Liverpool, United Kingdom.

Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg Thrombosis Research Unit, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Aug 1;5(8):e2229333. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.29333.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.29333
PMID:36044214
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9434362/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

The CHA2DS2-VASc score (calculated as congestive heart failure, hypertension, age 75 years and older, diabetes, stroke or TIA, vascular disease, age 65 to 74 years, and sex category) is the standard for assessing risk of stroke and systemic embolism and includes age and thromboembolic history. To our knowledge, no studies have comprehensively evaluated safety and effectiveness outcomes among patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation receiving oral anticoagulants according to independent, categorical risk strata.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the incidence of key adverse outcomes among patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation receiving oral anticoagulants by CHA2DS2-VASc risk score range, thromboembolic event history, and age group.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study was a retrospective claims data analysis using combined data sets from 5 large health claims databases. Eligible participants were adult patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who initiated oral anticoagulants. Data were analyzed between January 2012 and June 2019.

EXPOSURE

Initiation of oral anticoagulants.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

We observed clinical outcomes (including stroke or systemic embolism, major bleeding, and a composite outcome) on treatment through study end, censoring for discontinuation of oral anticoagulants, death, and insurance disenrollment. The population was stratified by CHA2DS2-VASc risk score; history of stroke, systemic embolism, or transient ischemic attack; and age groups. We calculated time to event, incidence rates, and cumulative incidence for outcomes.

RESULTS

We identified 1 141 097 patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation; the mean (SD) age was 75.0 (10.5) years, 608 127 patients (53.3%) were men, and over 1 million were placed in the 2 highest risk categories (high risk 1, 327 766 participants; high risk 2, 688 449 participants). Deyo-Charlson Comorbidity Index scores ranged progressively alongside CHA2DS2-VASc risk score strata (mean [SD] scores: low risk, 0.4 [1.0]; high risk 2, 4.1 [2.9]). The crude incidence of stroke and systemic embolism generally progressed alongside risk score strata (low risk, 0.25 events per 100 person-years [95% CI, 0.18-0.34 events]; high risk 2, 3.43 events per 100 person-years [95% CI, 3.06-4.20 events]); patients at the second-highest risk strata with thromboembolic event history had higher stroke incidence vs patients at the highest risk score strata without event history (2.06 events per 100 person-years [95% CI, 2.00-3.12 events] vs 1.18 events per 100 person-years [95% CI, 1.14-1.30 events]). Major bleeding and composite incidence also increased progressively alongside risk score strata (major bleeding: low risk, 0.68 events per 100 person-years [95% CI, 0.56-0.82 events]; high risk 2, 6.29 events per 100 person-years [95% CI, 6.21-6.62 events]; composite incidence: 1.22 events per 100 person-years [95% CI, 1.06-1.41 events]; high risk 2, 10.67 events per 100 person-years [95% CI, 10.26-11.48 events]). The 12-month cumulative incidence proportions for stroke and systemic embolism, major bleeding, and composite outcomes progressed alongside risk score strata (stroke or systemic embolism, 0.30%-1.85%; major bleeding, 0.55%-5.55%; composite, 1.05%-8.23%). Age subgroup analysis followed similar trends.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The observed incidence of stroke or systemic embolism and major bleeding events generally conformed to an expected increasing incidence by risk score, adding insight into the importance of specific risk score range, thromboembolic event history, and age group strata. These results can help inform clinical decision-making, research, and policy.

摘要

重要性

CHA2DS2-VASc 评分(计算为充血性心力衰竭、高血压、年龄 75 岁及以上、糖尿病、中风或 TIA、血管疾病、年龄 65 岁至 74 岁以及性别类别)是评估中风和全身性栓塞风险的标准,包括年龄和血栓栓塞病史。据我们所知,尚无研究全面评估根据独立的分类风险分层,接受口服抗凝剂的非瓣膜性心房颤动患者的安全性和有效性结局。

目的

根据 CHA2DS2-VASc 风险评分范围、血栓栓塞事件史和年龄组,评估接受口服抗凝剂的非瓣膜性心房颤动患者的关键不良结局的发生率。

设计、设置和参与者:这是一项回顾性的索赔数据分析,使用了来自 5 个大型健康索赔数据库的合并数据集。合格的参与者是开始口服抗凝剂的非瓣膜性心房颤动的成年患者。数据在 2012 年 1 月至 2019 年 6 月之间进行分析。

暴露

开始口服抗凝剂。

主要结果和测量

我们观察了治疗结束时(通过研究结束进行检测,以停止口服抗凝剂、死亡和保险退保为终点)的临床结局(包括中风或全身性栓塞、大出血和复合结局)。人群按 CHA2DS2-VASc 风险评分;中风、全身性栓塞或短暂性脑缺血发作史;以及年龄组进行分层。我们计算了事件的时间、发生率和累积发生率。

结果

我们确定了 1141097 名非瓣膜性心房颤动患者;平均(标准差)年龄为 75.0(10.5)岁,608127 名患者(53.3%)为男性,超过 100 万人被归入两个最高风险类别(高风险 1,327766 名参与者;高风险 2,688449 名参与者)。Deyo-Charlson 合并症指数评分随 CHA2DS2-VASc 风险评分分层逐渐升高(平均[标准差]评分:低风险,0.4[1.0];高风险 2,4.1[2.9])。中风和全身性栓塞的粗发生率通常随风险评分分层而增加(低风险,0.25 例/100 人年[95%CI,0.18-0.34 例];高风险 2,3.43 例/100 人年[95%CI,3.06-4.20 例]);有血栓栓塞事件史的第二高风险分层患者的中风发生率高于无事件史的最高风险评分分层患者(2.06 例/100 人年[95%CI,2.00-3.12 例]与 1.18 例/100 人年[95%CI,1.14-1.30 例])。大出血和复合发生率也随风险评分分层逐渐增加(大出血:低风险,0.68 例/100 人年[95%CI,0.56-0.82 例];高风险 2,6.29 例/100 人年[95%CI,6.21-6.62 例];复合发生率:1.22 例/100 人年[95%CI,1.06-1.41 例];高风险 2,10.67 例/100 人年[95%CI,10.26-11.48 例])。12 个月中风和全身性栓塞、大出血和复合结局的累积发生率比例随风险评分分层逐渐升高(中风或全身性栓塞,0.30%-1.85%;大出血,0.55%-5.55%;复合,1.05%-8.23%)。年龄亚组分析也呈现出类似的趋势。

结论和相关性

观察到的中风或全身性栓塞和大出血事件的发生率通常符合风险评分的预期递增发生率,这为特定风险评分范围、血栓栓塞事件史和年龄组分层的重要性提供了新的认识。这些结果可以帮助指导临床决策、研究和政策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/051d/9434362/19061a3fa05e/jamanetwopen-e2229333-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/051d/9434362/8ac4346fdc5a/jamanetwopen-e2229333-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/051d/9434362/19061a3fa05e/jamanetwopen-e2229333-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/051d/9434362/8ac4346fdc5a/jamanetwopen-e2229333-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/051d/9434362/19061a3fa05e/jamanetwopen-e2229333-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Risk Levels and Adverse Clinical Outcomes Among Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Receiving Oral Anticoagulants.非瓣膜性心房颤动患者接受口服抗凝剂治疗的风险水平和不良临床结局。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Aug 1;5(8):e2229333. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.29333.
2
Relation of Stroke and Bleeding Risk Profiles to Efficacy and Safety of Edoxaban for Cardioversion of Atrial Fibrillation (from the EdoxabaN versus warfarin in subjectS UndeRgoing cardiovErsion of Atrial Fibrillation [ENSURE-AF] Study).房颤患者电复律中新型口服抗凝剂(NOACs)与华法林的疗效和安全性比较(来自新型口服抗凝剂 Edoxaban 与华法林在房颤电复律患者中疗效和安全性的评估 [ENSURE-AF] 研究)
Am J Cardiol. 2018 Jan 15;121(2):193-198. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.10.008. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
3
Association of Rivaroxaban vs Apixaban With Major Ischemic or Hemorrhagic Events in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.利伐沙班与阿哌沙班治疗房颤患者的主要缺血或出血事件的相关性。
JAMA. 2021 Dec 21;326(23):2395-2404. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.21222.
4
Lower rate of major bleeding in very high risk patients undergoing left atrial appendage occlusion: A propensity score-matched comparison with direct oral anticoagulant.极高危患者行左心耳封堵术时大出血发生率更低:与直接口服抗凝剂的倾向性评分匹配比较。
Heart Rhythm. 2024 Aug;21(8):1267-1276. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.01.018. Epub 2024 Jan 20.
5
Risk factors for thromboembolic and bleeding events in anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation: the prospective, multicentre observational PREvention oF thromboembolic events - European Registry in Atrial Fibrillation (PREFER in AF).心房颤动抗凝治疗患者血栓栓塞和出血事件的风险因素:前瞻性、多中心观察性预防血栓栓塞事件-心房颤动欧洲登记研究(PREFER in AF)。
BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 30;9(3):e022478. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022478.
6
CHADS-VASc Scores and Major Bleeding in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Who Are Receiving Rivaroxaban.接受利伐沙班治疗的非瓣膜性心房颤动患者的CHADS-VASc评分与严重出血
Ann Emerg Med. 2017 May;69(5):541-550.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.09.032. Epub 2016 Nov 29.
7
Effect of 15-mg Edoxaban on Clinical Outcomes in 3 Age Strata in Older Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Prespecified Subanalysis of the ELDERCARE-AF Randomized Clinical Trial.15 毫克依度沙班对老年房颤患者 3 个年龄亚组临床结局的影响:ELDERCARE-AF 随机临床试验的预设亚组分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2022 Jun 1;7(6):583-590. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2022.0480.
8
[A comparison of CAS risk model and CHADS-VASc risk model in guiding anticoagulation treatment in Chinese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation].[中国非瓣膜性心房颤动患者中CAS风险模型与CHADS-VASc风险模型在指导抗凝治疗中的比较]
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2022 Sep 24;50(9):888-894. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20210826-00740.
9
Female Sex Is a Risk Modifier Rather Than a Risk Factor for Stroke in Atrial Fibrillation: Should We Use a CHADS-VA Score Rather Than CHADS-VASc?女性性别是房颤卒中的风险修饰因素而非风险因素:我们是否应该使用 CHADS-VA 评分而不是 CHADS-VASc?
Circulation. 2018 Feb 20;137(8):832-840. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.029081.
10
CHADS-VASc Score: A Predictor of Thromboembolic Events and Mortality in Patients With an Implantable Monitoring Device Without Atrial Fibrillation.CHADS-VASc评分:无房颤的植入式监测装置患者血栓栓塞事件和死亡率的预测指标
Mayo Clin Proc. 2017 Mar;92(3):360-369. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.10.008.

引用本文的文献

1
Association between Stroke History and Clinical Events in Atrial Fibrillation Patients after Valve Replacement.瓣膜置换术后房颤患者卒中病史与临床事件的关联
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Apr 23;26(4):26992. doi: 10.31083/RCM26992. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Edoxaban for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation and factors associated with dosing: patient characteristics from the prospective observational ETNA-AF-China registry.依度沙班预防心房颤动卒中的应用及与剂量相关的因素:前瞻性观察性 ETNA-AF-China 注册研究的患者特征。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 2;14(1):2778. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-51776-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Retinal vascular occlusions.视网膜血管阻塞。
Lancet. 2020 Dec 12;396(10266):1927-1940. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31559-2.
2
Epidemiology of Atrial Fibrillation in the 21st Century: Novel Methods and New Insights.21 世纪心房颤动的流行病学:新方法与新见解。
Circ Res. 2020 Jun 19;127(1):4-20. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.120.316340. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
3
Risks of Stroke and Mortality in Atrial Fibrillation Patients Treated With Rivaroxaban and Warfarin.利伐沙班与华法林治疗心房颤动患者的卒中风险和死亡率。
Stroke. 2020 Feb;51(2):549-555. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.025554. Epub 2019 Dec 31.
4
Atrial Fibrillation in Older People: Concepts and Controversies.老年人的心房颤动:概念与争议
Front Med (Lausanne). 2019 Aug 8;6:175. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2019.00175. eCollection 2019.
5
Stroke risk stratification in atrial fibrillation: a review of common risk factors.心房颤动的卒中风险分层:常见危险因素综述
J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2019 Apr 12;9(2):113-120. doi: 10.1080/20009666.2019.1593781. eCollection 2019 Apr.
6
Aging and ischemic stroke.衰老与缺血性中风。
Aging (Albany NY). 2019 May 1;11(9):2542-2544. doi: 10.18632/aging.101931.
7
Cardiovascular Risks Associated with Gender and Aging.与性别和衰老相关的心血管风险。
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2019 Apr 27;6(2):19. doi: 10.3390/jcdd6020019.
8
2019 AHA/ACC/HRS Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society.2019年美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会/心律学会对2014年美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会/心律学会心房颤动患者管理指南的聚焦更新:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南工作组和心律学会的报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Jul 9;74(1):104-132. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.01.011. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
9
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2019 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.《2019年心脏病和中风统计数据更新:美国心脏协会报告》
Circulation. 2019 Mar 5;139(10):e56-e528. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000659.
10
Geographic Disparities in the Incidence of Stroke among Patients with Atrial Fibrillation in the United States.美国心房颤动患者中风发病率的地域差异
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2019 Apr;28(4):890-899. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2018.12.005. Epub 2018 Dec 21.