University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA.
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Health Promot Pract. 2023 Sep;24(5):863-872. doi: 10.1177/15248399221115065. Epub 2022 Sep 1.
American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) youth, particularly males, experience disproportionately high rates of suicide compared to other young people in the United States. Therefore, enacting suicide prevention efforts for AI/AN youth is especially important. Since research shows that strengthening social, cultural, and emotional support can reduce suicide risk, many recent prevention efforts focus on these strategies. Yet, to reinforce and to extend the positive impact of these strategies for suicide risk reduction, we argue it is useful to identify baseline levels and other features of already-existing support. Toward this end, we describe the types (i.e., category), quantities (i.e., distribution and average number), sources (i.e., from whom), and frequencies (i.e., how often) of social support that AN young people report receiving, and we examine if these "support profiles" differ by age and sex. We use survey data from 165 ANs under age 30, collected as part of a participatory intervention study focused on Promoting Community Conversations About Research to End Suicide (PC CARES). We find that: 1) most ANs reported receiving nearly all supports, 2) compared with females, males reported receiving fewer supports on average, 3) family was the most selected support source, followed by close friends and service providers, and 4) family (e.g., parents, siblings, and grandparents) provided support regularly (i.e., monthly or more). Though our findings may suggest fruitful avenues for interventions targeted toward AN males, we discuss these findings in relation to the gendered nature of suicide prevention and assessment.
美国印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民(AI/AN)青年,尤其是男性,与美国其他年轻人相比,自杀率高得不成比例。因此,为 AI/AN 青年实施预防自杀的措施尤为重要。由于研究表明,加强社会、文化和情感支持可以降低自杀风险,因此许多最近的预防措施都集中在这些策略上。然而,为了加强和扩大这些策略对降低自杀风险的积极影响,我们认为确定已经存在的支持的基线水平和其他特征是有用的。为此,我们描述了 AI 青年报告收到的社会支持的类型(即类别)、数量(即分布和平均数量)、来源(即来自谁)和频率(即频率),并检查这些“支持概况”是否因年龄和性别而异。我们使用了 165 名 30 岁以下的 AI 青年的调查数据,这些数据是作为一项旨在促进关于研究以结束自杀的社区对话的参与式干预研究的一部分收集的。我们发现:1)大多数 AI 青年报告收到了几乎所有的支持;2)与女性相比,男性平均收到的支持较少;3)家庭是最受欢迎的支持来源,其次是亲密朋友和服务提供者;4)家庭(例如父母、兄弟姐妹和祖父母)定期提供支持(即每月或更多)。尽管我们的研究结果可能为针对 AI 男性的干预措施提供了有希望的途径,但我们还是根据性别对自杀预防和评估的影响来讨论这些发现。