• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

回避:一种非对抗性的影响策略。

Bypassing as a non-confrontational influence strategy.

机构信息

University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.

University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.

出版信息

Curr Opin Psychol. 2024 Oct;59:101855. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2024.101855. Epub 2024 Jul 31.

DOI:10.1016/j.copsyc.2024.101855
PMID:39128388
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11401750/
Abstract

Psychological interventions tend to be confrontational in nature. That is, when psychologists seek to bring about change in beliefs, attitudes, or behaviors, they often do so by directly confronting the presumed barrier to change. Confrontational approaches can be effective, but suffer from limitations to their efficacy, such as the possibility of arousing discomfort or defensiveness from the recipient. The current piece seeks to highlight an alternative strategy that we refer to as bypassing, which refers to a general approach for bringing about behavior change without confrontation. Leveraging insights from research on misinformation, stereotypes, and persuasion, we present evidence that non-confrontational approaches can be as effective, if not more so, than the traditional confrontational paradigm.

摘要

心理干预往往具有对抗性。也就是说,当心理学家试图改变信念、态度或行为时,他们通常会直接面对改变的障碍。对抗性方法可能是有效的,但它们的效果受到限制,例如可能会引起接受者的不适或防御。本文旨在强调我们称之为“绕过”的替代策略,这是一种在不进行对抗的情况下实现行为改变的一般方法。利用错误信息、刻板印象和说服研究的见解,我们提供的证据表明,非对抗性方法可以与传统的对抗性范式一样有效,如果不是更有效的话。

相似文献

1
Bypassing as a non-confrontational influence strategy.回避:一种非对抗性的影响策略。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2024 Oct;59:101855. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2024.101855. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
2
The neuroscience of persuasion: A review with an emphasis on issues and opportunities.说服的神经科学:一项重点关注问题与机遇的综述
Soc Neurosci. 2018 Apr;13(2):129-172. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2016.1273851. Epub 2017 Jan 9.
3
The relative impact of age and attractiveness stereotypes on persuasion.年龄和吸引力刻板印象对说服力的相对影响。
J Gerontol. 1983 May;38(3):340-3. doi: 10.1093/geronj/38.3.340.
4
The Application of Persuasion Theory to Placebo Effects.说服理论在安慰剂效应中的应用。
Int Rev Neurobiol. 2018;138:113-136. doi: 10.1016/bs.irn.2018.01.004. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
5
Bypassing misinformation without confrontation improves policy support as much as correcting it.不与错误信息对抗而加以回避,与纠正错误信息同样能提高政策支持率。
Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 12;13(1):6005. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-33299-5.
6
Persuasion, simulation and attitude change.说服、模拟与态度改变。
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 1981 Summer;27(2):154-60. doi: 10.1177/002076408102700212.
7
The influence of culture and close others on the effectiveness of (self)-persuasion.文化和亲近他人对(自我)劝导有效性的影响。
J Gen Psychol. 2022 Apr-Jun;149(2):139-168. doi: 10.1080/00221309.2020.1803193. Epub 2020 Aug 7.
8
Recognizing and Trusting Persuasion Agents: Attitudes Bias Trustworthiness Judgments, but not Persuasion Detection.识别和信任说服者:态度偏见信任判断,但不影响说服力判断。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2021 May;47(5):796-809. doi: 10.1177/0146167220946197. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
9
Exploring physiologic reactions to persuasive information.探究对有说服力信息的生理反应。
Psychophysiology. 2022 Jun;59(6):e14001. doi: 10.1111/psyp.14001. Epub 2022 Jan 23.
10
Attitudes and attitude change.态度与态度改变。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2011;62:391-417. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.121208.131609.

本文引用的文献

1
The persuasive effects of social cues and source effects on misinformation susceptibility.社会线索和来源效应对错误信息易感性的说服效果。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 20;14(1):4205. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-54030-y.
2
Generalization of beneficial exposure effects to untreated stimuli from another fear category.将有益暴露效应推广到来自另一个恐惧类别的未治疗刺激。
Transl Psychiatry. 2023 Dec 19;13(1):401. doi: 10.1038/s41398-023-02698-7.
3
Reducing Facial Stereotype Bias in Consequential Social Judgments: Intervention Success With White Male Faces.减少后果性社会判断中的面部刻板印象偏见:白人男性面孔的干预成功。
Psychol Sci. 2024 Jan;35(1):21-33. doi: 10.1177/09567976231215238. Epub 2023 Dec 18.
4
Listening to Misinformation while Driving: Cognitive Load and the Effectiveness of (Repeated) Corrections.驾驶时听信错误信息:认知负荷与(反复)纠正的效果
J Appl Res Mem Cogn. 2023 Sep;12(3):325-334. doi: 10.1037/mac0000057.
5
Hope over fear: The interplay between threat information and hope appeal corrections in debunking early COVID-19 misinformation.希望战胜恐惧:揭穿早期 COVID-19 错误信息过程中威胁信息和希望诉求纠正之间的相互作用。
Soc Sci Med. 2023 Sep;333:116132. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116132. Epub 2023 Jul 29.
6
Bypassing misinformation without confrontation improves policy support as much as correcting it.不与错误信息对抗而加以回避,与纠正错误信息同样能提高政策支持率。
Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 12;13(1):6005. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-33299-5.
7
Does explaining the origins of misinformation improve the effectiveness of a given correction?错误信息的起源解释是否能提高特定纠正措施的有效性?
Mem Cognit. 2023 Feb;51(2):422-436. doi: 10.3758/s13421-022-01354-7. Epub 2022 Sep 20.
8
Rumors in Retweet: Ideological Asymmetry in the Failure to Correct Misinformation.转发谣言:纠正错误信息失败中的意识形态不对称。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2024 Jan;50(1):3-17. doi: 10.1177/01461672221114222. Epub 2022 Sep 1.
9
Debunking health myths on the internet: the persuasive effect of (visual) online communication.揭穿互联网上的健康谣言:(视觉)在线交流的说服效果。
Z Gesundh Wiss. 2022;30(8):1823-1835. doi: 10.1007/s10389-022-01694-3. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
10
The role of discomfort in the continued influence effect of misinformation.不适感在错误信息持续影响效应中的作用。
Mem Cognit. 2022 Feb;50(2):435-448. doi: 10.3758/s13421-021-01232-8. Epub 2021 Sep 17.