Suppr超能文献

胆道癌术后放疗中临床靶区勾画的变化。

Variation in clinical target volume delineation in postoperative radiotherapy for biliary tract cancer.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Hallym University College of Medicine, Anyang, Republic of Korea.

Department of Radiation Oncology, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Sep 1;17(9):e0273395. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273395. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

We aimed to evaluate the inter-clinician variability in the clinical target volume (CTV) for postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) for biliary tract cancer (BTC) including extrahepatic bile duct cancer (EBDC) and gallbladder cancer (GBC). Nine experienced radiation oncologists delineated PORT CTVs for distal EBDC (pT2N1), proximal EBDC (pT2bN1) and GBC (pT2bN1) patients. The expectation maximization algorithm for Simultaneous Truth and Performance Level Estimation (STAPLE) was used to quantify expert agreements. We generated volumes with a confidence level of 80% to compare the maximum distance to each CTV in six directions. The degree of agreement was moderate; overall kappa values were 0.573 for distal EBDC, 0.513 for proximal EBDC, and 0.511 for GBC. In the distal EBDC, a larger variation was noted in the right, post, and inferior direction. In the proximal EBDC, all borders except the right and left direction showed a larger variation. In the GBC, a larger variation was found in the anterior, posterior, and inferior direction. The posterior and inferior borders were the common area having discrepancies, associated with the insufficient coverage of the paraaortic node. A consensus guideline is needed to reduce inter-clinician variability in the CTVs and adequate coverage of regional lymph node area.

摘要

我们旨在评估胆管癌(BTC)包括肝外胆管癌(EBDC)和胆囊癌(GBC)术后放疗(PORT)的临床靶区(CTV)的临床医生间变异性。9 名经验丰富的放射肿瘤学家勾画了远端 EBDC(pT2N1)、近端 EBDC(pT2bN1)和 GBC(pT2bN1)患者的 PORT CTV。使用同时真实和性能水平估计(STAPLE)的期望最大化算法来量化专家一致性。我们生成置信度为 80%的体积,以比较六个方向上每个 CTV 的最大距离。一致性程度为中度;远端 EBDC 的总体 Kappa 值为 0.573,近端 EBDC 为 0.513,GBC 为 0.511。在远端 EBDC 中,右、后和下方向的变化较大。在近端 EBDC 中,除了右和左方向外,所有边界的变化都较大。在 GBC 中,前、后和下方向的变化较大。后和下边界是存在差异的常见区域,与腹主动脉旁淋巴结覆盖不足有关。需要制定共识指南,以减少 CTV 的临床医生间变异性,并充分覆盖区域淋巴结区域。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0523/9436049/393b2e54b8dc/pone.0273395.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验