Suppr超能文献

18-64 岁有大型雇主赞助保险的员工中 2 型糖尿病导致的生产力损失和医疗费用。

Productivity Loss and Medical Costs Associated With Type 2 Diabetes Among Employees Aged 18-64 Years With Large Employer-Sponsored Insurance.

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 2022 Nov 1;45(11):2553-2560. doi: 10.2337/dc22-0445.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To estimate productivity losses and costs and medical costs due to type 2 diabetes (T2D) among employees aged 18-64 years.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Using 2018-2019 MarketScan databases, we identified employees with T2D or no diabetes among those with records on workplace absences, short-term disability (STD), and long-term disability (LTD). We estimated per capita mean annual time loss attributable to T2D and its associated costs, calculated by multiplying time loss by average hourly wage. We estimated direct medical costs of T2D in total and by service type (inpatient, outpatient, and prescription drugs). We used two-part models (productivity losses and costs and inpatient and drug costs) and generalized linear models (total and outpatient costs) for overall and subgroup analyses by age and sex. All costs were in 2019 U.S. dollars.

RESULTS

Employees with T2D had 4.2 excess days lost (20.8 vs. 20.3 absences, 6.4 vs. 3.3 STD days, and 1.0 vs. 0.4 LTD days) than those without diabetes. Productivity costs were 13.3% ($680) higher and medical costs were double (total $11,354 vs. $5,101; outpatient $4,558 vs. $2,687, inpatient $3,085 vs. $1,349, prescription drugs $4,182 vs. $1,189) for employees with T2D. Employees aged 18-34 years had higher STD days and outpatient costs. Women had more absences and STD days and higher outpatient costs than men.

CONCLUSIONS

T2D contributes nearly $7,000 higher annual per capita costs, mostly due to excess medical costs. Our estimates may assist employers to assess potential financial gains from efforts to help workers prevent or better manage T2D.

摘要

目的

估计 18-64 岁员工中 2 型糖尿病(T2D)导致的生产力损失和成本以及医疗费用。

研究设计和方法

使用 2018-2019 年 MarketScan 数据库,我们在有工作场所缺勤、短期残疾 (STD) 和长期残疾 (LTD) 记录的员工中,确定了患有 T2D 或无糖尿病的员工。我们估计了归因于 T2D 的人均年平均时间损失,并通过将时间损失乘以平均每小时工资来计算相关成本。我们按服务类型(住院、门诊和处方药)计算了 T2D 的总直接医疗费用和 T2D 的直接医疗费用。我们使用两部分模型(生产力损失和成本以及住院和药物成本)和广义线性模型(总门诊成本)对按年龄和性别进行的总体和亚组分析。所有成本均以 2019 年美元计算。

结果

患有 T2D 的员工比没有糖尿病的员工缺勤多出 4.2 天(20.8 天与 20.3 天缺勤,6.4 天与 3.3 天 STD 缺勤,1.0 天与 0.4 天 LTD 缺勤)。生产力成本高出 13.3%(680 美元),医疗费用翻了一番(总费用为 11354 美元与 5101 美元;门诊费用为 4558 美元与 2687 美元,住院费用为 3085 美元与 1349 美元,处方药费用为 4182 美元与 1189 美元)。18-34 岁的员工 STD 缺勤和门诊费用更高。女性的缺勤和 STD 缺勤天数以及门诊费用均高于男性。

结论

T2D 导致每年人均成本增加近 7000 美元,主要是由于医疗费用增加。我们的估计可能有助于雇主评估从帮助员工预防或更好地管理 T2D 的努力中获得潜在经济收益的能力。

相似文献

5
Economic costs of diabetes in the US in 2002.2002年美国糖尿病的经济成本。
Diabetes Care. 2003 Mar;26(3):917-32. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.3.917.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

5
Economic Costs of Diabetes in the U.S. in 2017.2017 年美国糖尿病的经济成本。
Diabetes Care. 2018 May;41(5):917-928. doi: 10.2337/dci18-0007. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
6
Modeling Health Care Expenditures and Use.建模医疗保健支出和使用。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2018 Apr 1;39:489-505. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040617-013517. Epub 2018 Jan 12.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验