Department of Health Sciences, Lund University, HSC Margaretavägen 1 B, 22240, Lund, Sweden.
Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 Sep 1;20(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00894-3.
User involvement in research has rapidly increased and is often a precondition to obtain research funding. Benefits such as effectiveness and increased relevance of research are described in the literature, but the evidence to support this is weak. Little is known about ageing and health researchers' experiences and perspectives towards user involvement in research, and their attitudes towards user involvement compared to the attitudes of the users involved are largely unknown. To examine researchers' experiences and perspectives of user involvement in research on ageing and health, and to compare their attitudes towards user involvement to the attitudes of older adults in the general population.
A panel study survey was used to elicit responses from researchers in ageing and health as well as from older adults (aged 60 years and older). The researcher sample (N = 64) completed the survey online, while the older adult sample (N = 881) could choose among three different options to complete the survey (online, paper format, telephone). A professional survey company collected the data. Descriptive statistics, exploratory comparisons and descriptive qualitative content analysis were used to analyse the data.
More than half (58%) of the researchers had previous experience of involving different categories of users in a wide range of research activities. The most frequent motivation for involving users was to ensure that the research produced is relevant to the target population. A majority (86%) reported benefits, and more than half (59%) described challenges. Differences in attitudes were found between researchers and older adults in the general population.
Ageing and health researchers involve users in their research to improve quality and ensure relevance, but there is no consensus among them whether users should be involved in publicly funded research. While several challenges were identified, training, institutional support and resources from funders could alleviate many of these. Findings reveal significant differences in attitudes between older adults in the general population and researchers. Further research with comparable larger samples is needed to confirm and understand the possible consequences such controversy might have and how to solve them. IRRID (International Registered Report Identifier): RR2-10.2196/17759.
用户参与研究的比例迅速增加,并且通常是获得研究资金的前提条件。文献中描述了这种做法的好处,例如提高研究的有效性和相关性,但支持这一说法的证据还很薄弱。人们对老年医学和健康研究人员对用户参与研究的经验和看法知之甚少,也不太了解他们对用户参与研究的态度与所涉及的用户的态度有何不同。本研究旨在探讨老年医学和健康研究人员对用户参与研究的经验和看法,并将他们对用户参与研究的态度与一般人群中老年人的态度进行比较。
本研究采用小组研究调查的方法,从老年医学和健康研究人员以及老年人(年龄在 60 岁及以上)中获取信息。研究人员样本(N=64)在线完成调查,而老年成年人样本(N=881)可以选择在线、纸质格式或电话三种方式之一完成调查。一家专业的调查公司收集了数据。使用描述性统计、探索性比较和描述性定性内容分析来分析数据。
超过一半(58%)的研究人员以前有过让不同类别的用户参与各种研究活动的经验。让用户参与的最常见动机是确保研究结果与目标人群相关。大多数(86%)人报告了益处,超过一半(59%)人描述了挑战。研究人员和一般人群中的老年人之间的态度存在差异。
老年医学和健康研究人员让用户参与他们的研究,以提高质量并确保相关性,但他们对用户是否应该参与公共资助的研究没有共识。虽然确定了一些挑战,但培训、机构支持和资助者的资源可以缓解其中的许多挑战。研究结果表明,一般人群中的老年人和研究人员之间的态度存在显著差异。需要进一步开展具有可比性的更大样本量的研究,以确认和理解这种争议可能带来的影响以及如何解决这些问题。IRRID(国际注册报告标识符):RR2-10.2196/17759。