Górska Katarzyna, Maskey-Warzęchowska Marta, Barnaś Małgorzata, Białas Adam, Barczyk Adam, Jagielska-Len Hanna, Jassem Ewa, Kania Aleksander, Lewandowska Katarzyna, Majewski Sebastian, Martusewicz-Boros Magdalena M, Piotrowski Wojciech J, Siemińska Alicja, Sładek Krzysztof, Sobiecka Małgorzata, Trzaska-Sobczak Marzena, Tomkowski Witold, Żołnowska Beata, Krenke Rafał
Department of Internal Medicine, Pulmonary Diseases and Allergy, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Department of Internal Medicine, Pulmonary Diseases and Allergy, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland.
Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2022 Aug 22;13:20406223221117982. doi: 10.1177/20406223221117982. eCollection 2022.
Pirfenidone and nintedanib are considered as the standard of care in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), but there is no consensus as to which of these two agents should be regarded as first-line treatment.
To provide real-world data on therapeutic decisions of pulmonary specialists, particularly the choice of the antifibrotic drug in patients with IPF.
This was a multicenter, prospective survey collecting clinical data of patients with IPF considered as candidates for antifibrotic treatment between September 2019 and December 2020. Clinical characteristics and information on the therapeutic approach were retrieved. Statistical evaluation included multiple logistic regression analysis with stepwise model selection.
Data on 188 patients [74.5% male, median age 73 (interquartile range, 68-78) years] considered for antifibrotic therapy were collected. Treatment was initiated in 138 patients, while 50 patients did not receive an antifibrotic, mainly due to the lack of consent for treatment and IPF severity. Seventy-two patients received pirfenidone and 66 received nintedanib. Dosing protocol ( < 0.01) and patient preference ( = 0.049) were more frequently associated with the choice of nintedanib, while comorbidity profile ( = 0.0003) and concomitant medication use ( = 0.03) were more frequently associated with the choice of pirfenidone. Age ( = 0.002), lung transfer factor for carbon monoxide (TL) ( = 0.001), and gastrointestinal bleeding ( = 0.03) were significantly associated with the qualification for the antifibrotic treatment.
This real-world prospective study showed that dose protocol and patient preference were more frequently associated with the choice of nintedanib, while the comorbidity profile and concomitant medication use were more frequently associated with the choice of pirfenidone. Age, TL, and history of gastrointestinal bleeding were significant factors influencing the decision to initiate antifibrotic therapy.
吡非尼酮和尼达尼布被视为特发性肺纤维化(IPF)的治疗标准,但对于这两种药物中哪一种应被视为一线治疗尚无共识。
提供肺部专家治疗决策的真实世界数据,特别是IPF患者抗纤维化药物的选择。
这是一项多中心前瞻性调查,收集2019年9月至2020年12月期间被视为抗纤维化治疗候选者的IPF患者的临床数据。检索临床特征和治疗方法的信息。统计评估包括采用逐步模型选择的多重逻辑回归分析。
收集了188例被考虑进行抗纤维化治疗的患者的数据[男性占74.5%,中位年龄73岁(四分位间距,68 - 78岁)]。138例患者开始治疗,而50例患者未接受抗纤维化治疗,主要原因是缺乏治疗同意书和IPF严重程度。72例患者接受吡非尼酮治疗,66例患者接受尼达尼布治疗。给药方案(<0.01)和患者偏好(=0.049)与尼达尼布的选择更常相关,而合并症情况(=0.0003)和伴随用药情况(=0.03)与吡非尼酮的选择更常相关。年龄(=0.002)、一氧化碳肺转运因子(TL)(=0.001)和胃肠道出血(=0.03)与抗纤维化治疗的资格显著相关。
这项真实世界的前瞻性研究表明,给药方案和患者偏好与尼达尼布的选择更常相关,而合并症情况和伴随用药情况与吡非尼酮的选择更常相关。年龄、TL和胃肠道出血史是影响启动抗纤维化治疗决策的重要因素。