• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿科急诊科脓毒症的识别:一项范围综述。

Identification of sepsis in paediatric emergency departments: A scoping review.

机构信息

Noah's Ark Children's Hospital for Wales, Cardiff, UK.

Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.

出版信息

Acta Paediatr. 2022 Dec;111(12):2262-2277. doi: 10.1111/apa.16536. Epub 2022 Sep 14.

DOI:10.1111/apa.16536
PMID:36053116
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9826118/
Abstract

AIM

Sepsis is an acute illness associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Early detection and time-sensitive management of sepsis has been shown to improve outcomes. We report the results of a scoping review to explore methods evaluated for the identification of sepsis in children presenting to emergency departments.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was carried out on two databases, Medline and Web of Science, to identify relevant studies published from 1990 to 2022. Data were extracted for age groups including study design, reference standard used for comparison, sepsis identification method evaluated and study quality.

RESULTS

A total of 89 studies were identified from the literature search. There was significant heterogeneity in the age groups including study design and reference standards used for evaluating the performance of the sepsis identification methods. There has been a substantial increase in the number of published studies in the last 2 years.

CONCLUSION

Our scoping review identifies marked heterogeneity in approaches to identifying sepsis but demonstrates a recent focus of research on patient outcomes. Using appropriate core outcome sets, developing reference standards, monitoring sepsis prevalence via registries and continuously monitoring process measures will provide robust evidence to identify the best performing identification tools and the impact they have on patient-orientated outcomes.

摘要

目的

脓毒症是一种与高发病率和死亡率相关的急性疾病。早期发现和及时处理脓毒症已被证明可以改善预后。我们报告了一项范围综述的结果,以探讨在急诊科就诊的儿童中用于识别脓毒症的方法。

方法

我们在两个数据库(Medline 和 Web of Science)上进行了系统的文献检索,以确定从 1990 年到 2022 年发表的相关研究。我们提取了包括研究设计、用于比较的参考标准、评估的脓毒症识别方法和研究质量在内的数据。

结果

从文献检索中总共确定了 89 项研究。在包括研究设计和用于评估脓毒症识别方法性能的参考标准在内的年龄组方面,存在显著的异质性。在过去的 2 年中,发表的研究数量显著增加。

结论

我们的范围综述确定了识别脓毒症的方法存在明显的异质性,但表明最近的研究重点是患者结局。使用适当的核心结局集、制定参考标准、通过登记处监测脓毒症的患病率以及持续监测流程措施,将为识别性能最佳的识别工具及其对以患者为中心的结局的影响提供有力证据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b14/9826118/aa53fb58adbf/APA-111-2262-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b14/9826118/9d6936af826c/APA-111-2262-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b14/9826118/aa53fb58adbf/APA-111-2262-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b14/9826118/9d6936af826c/APA-111-2262-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b14/9826118/aa53fb58adbf/APA-111-2262-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Identification of sepsis in paediatric emergency departments: A scoping review.儿科急诊科脓毒症的识别:一项范围综述。
Acta Paediatr. 2022 Dec;111(12):2262-2277. doi: 10.1111/apa.16536. Epub 2022 Sep 14.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
4
Automated monitoring compared to standard care for the early detection of sepsis in critically ill patients.与标准护理相比,自动监测用于危重症患者脓毒症的早期检测
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 25;6(6):CD012404. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012404.pub2.
5
Sepsis Alerts in Emergency Departments: A Systematic Review of Accuracy and Quality Measure Impact.急诊科脓毒症预警:准确性和质量测量影响的系统评价。
West J Emerg Med. 2020 Aug 24;21(5):1201-1210. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2020.5.46010.
6
Sepsis triggers and tools to support early identification in healthcare settings: An integrative review.脓毒症触发因素和支持医疗环境中早期识别的工具:综合评价。
Aust Crit Care. 2023 Nov;36(6):1117-1128. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2023.01.001. Epub 2023 Feb 20.
7
Computerized Clinical Decision Support Systems for the Early Detection of Sepsis Among Adult Inpatients: Scoping Review.计算机化临床决策支持系统用于早期检测成年住院患者脓毒症:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Feb 23;24(2):e31083. doi: 10.2196/31083.
8
Identification of distinct clinical profiles of sepsis risk in paediatric emergency department patients using Bayesian profile regression.使用贝叶斯轮廓回归识别儿科急诊科患者败血症风险的不同临床特征。
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2025 Mar 12;9(1):e003100. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2024-003100.
9
Ethics of Procuring and Using Organs or Tissue from Infants and Newborns for Transplantation, Research, or Commercial Purposes: Protocol for a Bioethics Scoping Review.从婴儿和新生儿获取器官或组织用于移植、研究或商业目的的伦理问题:生物伦理学范围审查方案
Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Dec 5;9:717. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.23235.1. eCollection 2024.
10
Out-of-hospital care of postpartum hemorrhage: a scoping review.产后出血的院外护理:一项范围综述
JBI Evid Synth. 2025 May 1;23(5):920-948. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-24-00058. Epub 2025 May 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Predicting sepsis treatment decisions in the paediatric emergency department using machine learning: the AiSEPTRON study.利用机器学习预测儿科急诊科的脓毒症治疗决策:AiSEPTRON研究
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2025 May 14;9(1):e003273. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2024-003273.
2
LINC02363: a potential biomarker for early diagnosis and treatment of sepsis.LINC02363:一种用于脓毒症早期诊断和治疗的潜在生物标志物。
BMC Immunol. 2025 Mar 15;26(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12865-025-00702-x.
3
Predictive biomarker of mortality in children with infectious diseases: a nationwide data analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Development of a Quality Improvement Learning Collaborative to Improve Pediatric Sepsis Outcomes.开发一个质量改进学习协作组以改善儿科脓毒症结局。
Pediatrics. 2021 Jan;147(1). doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-1434. Epub 2020 Dec 16.
2
Pediatric Sepsis Definition-A Systematic Review Protocol by the Pediatric Sepsis Definition Taskforce.《儿科脓毒症定义——儿科脓毒症定义特别工作组的系统评价方案》
Crit Care Explor. 2020 Jun 11;2(6):e0123. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000123. eCollection 2020 Jun.
3
Core outcome set in paediatric sepsis in low- and middle-income countries: a study protocol.
感染性疾病患儿死亡的预测生物标志物:一项全国性数据分析。
Front Pediatr. 2024 Jul 2;12:1381310. doi: 10.3389/fped.2024.1381310. eCollection 2024.
4
Retrospective analysis of pediatric sepsis and the burden of antimicrobial resistance in Duhok, Kurdistan Region of Iraq.伊拉克库尔德地区杜胡克小儿脓毒症及抗菌药物耐药负担的回顾性分析
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Feb 26;15:1347832. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1347832. eCollection 2024.
低收入和中等收入国家儿童脓毒症的核心结局集:一项研究方案
BMJ Open. 2020 Apr 6;10(4):e034960. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034960.
4
Surviving Sepsis Campaign International Guidelines for the Management of Septic Shock and Sepsis-Associated Organ Dysfunction in Children.《拯救脓毒症运动:儿童脓毒性休克及脓毒症相关器官功能障碍管理国际指南》
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2020 Feb;21(2):e52-e106. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002198.
5
Research priorities for European paediatric emergency medicine.欧洲儿科急诊医学研究重点。
Arch Dis Child. 2019 Sep;104(9):869-873. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2019-316918. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
6
PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation.PRISMA 扩展用于范围审查 (PRISMA-ScR): 清单和解释。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
7
Culture-Negative Septic Shock Compared With Culture-Positive Septic Shock: A Retrospective Cohort Study.文化阴性感染性休克与文化阳性感染性休克的比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
Crit Care Med. 2018 Apr;46(4):506-512. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002924.
8
PREDICT prioritisation study: establishing the research priorities of paediatric emergency medicine physicians in Australia and New Zealand.预测优先研究:确定澳大利亚和新西兰儿科急诊医师的研究重点。
Emerg Med J. 2018 Jan;35(1):39-45. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2017-206727. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
9
Core Outcome Sets.核心结局集
Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed. 2018 Jun;103(3):163-166. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2016-312117. Epub 2017 Jun 30.
10
STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration.《STARD 2015诊断准确性研究报告指南:解释与详述》
BMJ Open. 2016 Nov 14;6(11):e012799. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012799.