Department of Orthopedics, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Beverly Hills, California, USA.
Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Beverly Hills, California, USA.
Health Serv Res. 2023 Feb;58 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):100-110. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14052. Epub 2022 Sep 2.
To evaluate outcomes associated with an integrated inpatient and outpatient program aimed at optimizing the care of geriatric fracture patients in a mixed community and academic health system setting.
This study took place at a tertiary-care, 886-bed hospital system. The Geriatric Fracture Program (GFP) was designed in 2018 using the 4Ms Framework (What Matters, Medication, Mentation, and Mobility). Patients ≥65 years old with non-spine fractures managed by orthopedic faculty surgeons and participating hospitalist groups were included. A fracture liaison team educated patients regarding bone health and ensured ambulatory geriatrics follow-up. Outpatient geriatric visits focused on mobility, fall risk, bone health imaging, and medications.
We compared GFP-enrolled patients (n = 746) to patients seen by non-GFP-participating physicians (n = 852) and used a generalized estimating equations approach and Poisson models to analyze associations between participation in the GFP program and four inpatient outcomes (time to surgery, length of stay, Vizient length of stay index, and total direct costs). We examined outcomes across all fractures and also stratified them by fracture type (hip vs. non-hip). We descriptively examined post-discharge care outcomes: fall, gait, and balance assessments; bone health imaging; and medications.
DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: We collected data through chart reviews/electronic health record extracts from July 2018 to June 2021.
GFP-enrolled patients with all fracture types had a significantly lower length of stay (marginal effect [ME]: -2.12, 95%CI: -2.61, -1.63), length of stay index (ME: -0.33, 95%CI: -0.42, -0.25), and total direct costs (ME: -$5316, 95%CI: -$6806, -$3826); the magnitude of the effects was greater for non-hip fractures. There was no significant difference in time to surgery. Of 746 GFP patients, 170 (23%) had a post-discharge visit with a participating geriatrician ≥6 months.
A systematic approach to improving care for older adults with fractures improved length of stay and total direct costs.
评估旨在优化混合社区和学术健康系统中老年骨折患者护理的综合住院和门诊计划相关结果。
本研究在一家三级护理、886 张床位的医院系统中进行。老年骨折项目(GFP)于 2018 年使用 4M 框架(重要事项、药物、心理状态和活动能力)设计。纳入由骨科教师外科医生和参与医院内科组管理的年龄≥65 岁、非脊柱骨折患者。骨折联络小组向患者提供有关骨骼健康的教育,并确保开展可走动的老年科随访。门诊老年科就诊侧重于活动能力、跌倒风险、骨骼健康成像和药物治疗。
我们将 GFP 登记患者(n=746)与非 GFP 参与医生就诊患者(n=852)进行比较,并使用广义估计方程方法和泊松模型分析参与 GFP 项目与四项住院治疗结果(手术时间、住院时间、Vizient 住院时间指数和直接总费用)之间的关联。我们分析了所有骨折患者以及按骨折类型(髋部与非髋部)分层的结果。我们描述性地检查了出院后护理结果:跌倒、步态和平衡评估、骨骼健康成像和药物治疗。
资料收集/提取方法:我们通过 2018 年 7 月至 2021 年 6 月的图表审查/电子健康记录提取收集数据。
所有类型骨折的 GFP 登记患者的住院时间(边际效应[ME]:-2.12,95%CI:-2.61,-1.63)、住院时间指数(ME:-0.33,95%CI:-0.42,-0.25)和直接总费用(ME:-5316 美元,95%CI:-6806 美元,-3826 美元)显著降低;非髋部骨折的影响幅度更大。手术时间无显著差异。在 746 名 GFP 患者中,有 170 名(23%)在出院后≥6 个月接受了参与老年病学家的就诊。
系统方法改善了老年骨折患者的护理,缩短了住院时间并降低了直接总费用。