• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

贝叶斯稀疏建模识别安全性数据分析中高危亚组。

Bayesian sparse modeling to identify high-risk subgroups in meta-analysis of safety data.

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.

Department of Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

Res Synth Methods. 2022 Nov;13(6):807-820. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1597. Epub 2022 Aug 26.

DOI:10.1002/jrsm.1597
PMID:36054779
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9649868/
Abstract

Meta-analysis allows researchers to combine evidence from multiple studies, making it a powerful tool for synthesizing information on the safety profiles of new medical interventions. There is a critical need to identify subgroups at high risk of experiencing treatment-related toxicities. However, this remains quite challenging from a statistical perspective as there are a variety of clinical risk factors that may be relevant for different types of adverse events, and adverse events of interest may be rare or incompletely reported. We frame this challenge as a variable selection problem and propose a Bayesian hierarchical model which incorporates a horseshoe prior on the interaction terms to identify high-risk groups. Our proposed model is motivated by a meta-analysis of adverse events in cancer immunotherapy, and our results uncover key factors driving the risk of specific types of treatment-related adverse events.

摘要

元分析使研究人员能够合并来自多个研究的证据,从而成为综合新医疗干预措施安全性特征信息的有力工具。从统计学角度来看,确定有较高风险经历治疗相关毒性的亚组至关重要。然而,这仍然具有很大的挑战性,因为可能有各种临床危险因素与不同类型的不良事件相关,并且感兴趣的不良事件可能很少或未完全报告。我们将这一挑战框定为变量选择问题,并提出了一种贝叶斯层次模型,该模型在交互项上采用了马氏先验,以识别高风险组。我们提出的模型是基于癌症免疫治疗不良事件的元分析,我们的结果揭示了驱动特定类型治疗相关不良事件风险的关键因素。

相似文献

1
Bayesian sparse modeling to identify high-risk subgroups in meta-analysis of safety data.贝叶斯稀疏建模识别安全性数据分析中高危亚组。
Res Synth Methods. 2022 Nov;13(6):807-820. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1597. Epub 2022 Aug 26.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
A Bayesian meta-analytic approach for safety signal detection in randomized clinical trials.一种用于随机临床试验中安全信号检测的贝叶斯荟萃分析方法。
Clin Trials. 2017 Apr;14(2):192-200. doi: 10.1177/1740774516683920. Epub 2017 Jan 6.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
6
Nutritional supplementation for nonalcohol-related fatty liver disease: a network meta-analysis.非酒精性脂肪性肝病的营养补充:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jul 19;7(7):CD013157. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013157.pub2.
7
A Bayesian Meta-analysis Method for Estimating Risk Difference of Rare Events.
J Biopharm Stat. 2018;28(3):550-561. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2017.1372767. Epub 2017 Oct 20.
8
Integration of elicited expert information via a power prior in Bayesian variable selection: Application to colon cancer data.通过幂先验在贝叶斯变量选择中整合诱发的专家信息:在结肠癌数据中的应用。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2020 Feb;29(2):541-567. doi: 10.1177/0962280219841082. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
9
10
Antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in people with liver cirrhosis: a network meta-analysis.抗生素预防肝硬化患者自发性细菌性腹膜炎:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 16;1(1):CD013125. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013125.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Selection of indirect treatment comparisons for health technology assessments: a practical guide for health economics and outcomes research scientists and clinicians.卫生技术评估中间接治疗比较的选择:卫生经济学与结果研究科学家及临床医生实用指南
BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 25;15(3):e091961. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-091961.

本文引用的文献

1
On Bayesian modeling of censored data in JAGS.在 JAGS 中对删失数据进行贝叶斯建模。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2022 Mar 23;23(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12859-021-04496-8.
2
Strategies for improving the management of immune-related adverse events.改善免疫相关不良反应管理的策略。
J Immunother Cancer. 2020 Dec;8(2). doi: 10.1136/jitc-2020-001754.
3
Assessment of Anhedonia in Adults With and Without Mental Illness: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.成人有无精神疾病的快感缺失评估:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Aug 3;3(8):e2013233. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.13233.
4
Immune-Related Adverse Events: A Case-Based Approach.免疫相关不良事件:基于病例的方法
Front Oncol. 2019 Jun 20;9:530. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00530. eCollection 2019.
5
Treatment-Related Adverse Events of PD-1 and PD-L1 Inhibitors in Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.临床试验中 PD-1 和 PD-L1 抑制剂的治疗相关不良反应:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Oncol. 2019 Jul 1;5(7):1008-1019. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.0393.
6
Haematological immune-related adverse events induced by anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy: a descriptive observational study.抗PD-1或抗PD-L1免疫疗法诱导的血液学免疫相关不良事件:一项描述性观察研究。
Lancet Haematol. 2019 Jan;6(1):e48-e57. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(18)30175-3. Epub 2018 Dec 4.
7
Avelumab, an Anti-Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Antibody, In Patients With Refractory Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: Results From a Multicenter, Phase Ib Study.阿维鲁单抗,一种抗程序性死亡配体1抗体,用于难治性转移性尿路上皮癌患者:一项多中心1b期研究的结果
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jul 1;35(19):2117-2124. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.71.6795. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
8
Adverse Events in Cancer Immunotherapy.癌症免疫治疗中的不良事件
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017;995:155-174. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-53156-4_8.
9
Association of Vitiligo With Tumor Response in Patients With Metastatic Melanoma Treated With Pembrolizumab.白癜风与帕博利珠单抗治疗转移性黑色素瘤患者肿瘤应答的关联。
JAMA Dermatol. 2016 Jan;152(1):45-51. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2015.2707.
10
A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis.Meta 分析中固定效应模型和随机效应模型的基本介绍。
Res Synth Methods. 2010 Apr;1(2):97-111. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.12. Epub 2010 Nov 21.