Donaldson Candice D, Alvaro Eusebio M, Siegel Jason T, Crano William D
Department of Psychology, Claremont Graduate University, 150 E, 10(th) St., Claremont, CA 91711, USA.
Addict Behav. 2023 Jan;136:107466. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2022.107466. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
Psychological reactance (PR) is a psychological state or trait typified by resistant responses to threats to behavioral freedom. PR has been linked with negative health behaviors, including risky substance use; however, factors that may foster approaches to mitigate the impact of PR on these behaviors, as well as rejection of other health promotion communications is less understood. The current studies examined relations between parental warmth and monitoring with trait PR and responses to preventive cannabis communications and usage intentions. Two in-school surveys were administered to two difference samples of middle school students (Study 1, N = 1,416; Study 2, N = 1,118). Path analytic models tested multivariable linkages among relevant parenting variables, PR, and outcomes associated with cannabis use. Follow-up regression analyses explored significant interaction effects. In Study 1 (p <0.001) and Study 2 (p <0.01), parental warmth moderated the relation between monitoring and trait PR: High monitoring was a protective factor only when combined with high warmth. In turn, PR mediated the relationships between parenting practices and cannabis intentions in both studies (p <0.001). In Study 2, PR also was linked with resistance to persuasion via more unfavorable reactions to anti-cannabis appeals (p <0.001). Findings indicated that low parental warmth combined with high parental monitoring was associated with high trait reactance in adolescents, which predisposed them to stronger resistance to preventive communications. Interventions might focus on counseling parents about the likely outcomes of parenting style, and ways to implement beneficial approaches.
心理抗拒(PR)是一种心理状态或特质,其典型特征是对行为自由受到的威胁产生抗拒反应。PR与消极健康行为有关,包括危险物质的使用;然而,对于可能促进减轻PR对这些行为影响的方法,以及对其他健康促进信息的抵触,人们了解较少。当前的研究考察了父母温暖与监督与特质PR之间的关系,以及对预防性大麻信息的反应和使用意图。对两个不同的中学生样本进行了两次校内调查(研究1,N = 1416;研究2,N = 1118)。路径分析模型测试了相关育儿变量、PR以及与大麻使用相关的结果之间的多变量联系。后续回归分析探讨了显著的交互作用。在研究1(p < 0.001)和研究2(p < 0.01)中,父母温暖调节了监督与特质PR之间的关系:只有当高监督与高温暖相结合时,高监督才是一个保护因素。反过来,在两项研究中,PR都介导了育儿方式与大麻意图之间的关系(p < 0.001)。在研究2中,PR还通过对反大麻呼吁的更不利反应与对说服的抗拒相关联(p < 0.001)。研究结果表明,父母温暖程度低与父母监督程度高相结合,与青少年的高特质抗拒有关,这使他们更容易对预防性信息产生更强的抗拒。干预措施可能侧重于为父母提供关于育儿方式可能产生的结果的咨询,以及实施有益方法的途径。