Navarro-Love Gabriella Y, Stinson Elizabeth A, Sullivan Ryan M, Lisdahl Krista M
Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin at Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI 53201, United States.
Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, United States.
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2025 May 28;74:101572. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2025.101572.
Parental history of problematic substance use (PH) increases the risk for early adolescent substance use (SU), potentially due to premorbid differences in reward-processing brain regions (e.g., striatum). However, no studies have prospectively examined the separate contributions of parental history of alcohol (PHA) and drug (PHD) use or the impact of PH density (PH, PH, PH) on reward processing in preadolescents. This study analyzed data from 10,235 participants (ages 9-14) in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study (ABCD). Reward processing was assessed using the Monetary Incentive Delay Task (MID) at baseline and two-year follow-up. Regions of interest included bilateral striatal activation elicited by neutral vs. anticipation of large rewards. Linear mixed-effect models evaluated PH, PHA, PHD, and PH density on ROI activation, controlling for relevant covariates. Results showed that youth with PHA had greater nucleus accumbens activation during reward anticipation than those with no history (PHA), but no significant differences were found between PHA and PHA or PHA and PHA. PHD and PH were not significantly associated with BOLD activation in striatal regions, nor were there changes over time. These findings highlight the need to consider both PH and environmental factors when assessing neurodevelopmental risk for early substance use.
有问题物质使用的家族史(PH)会增加青少年早期物质使用(SU)的风险,这可能是由于奖励处理脑区(如纹状体)的病前差异所致。然而,尚无研究前瞻性地考察父母酒精使用家族史(PHA)和药物使用家族史(PHD)的单独影响,或PH密度(PH,PH,PH)对青春期前儿童奖励处理的影响。本研究分析了青少年大脑认知发展研究(ABCD)中10235名参与者(9至14岁)的数据。在基线和两年随访时使用金钱激励延迟任务(MID)评估奖励处理。感兴趣的区域包括由中性刺激与预期大奖励引发的双侧纹状体激活。线性混合效应模型评估了PH、PHA、PHD和PH密度对感兴趣区域激活的影响,并控制了相关协变量。结果显示,有PHA的青少年在奖励预期期间伏隔核激活程度高于无家族史者(PHA),但PHA与PHA或PHA与PHA之间未发现显著差异。PHD和PH与纹状体区域的BOLD激活无显著关联,且随时间也无变化。这些发现凸显了在评估早期物质使用的神经发育风险时,需要同时考虑PH和环境因素。