• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全内镜腰椎间盘切除术术后症状性假性囊肿的翻修手术:临床特点和手术策略。

Revision surgery for symptomatic postoperative pseudocyst following full-endoscopic lumbar discectomy: clinical characteristics and surgical strategies.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Capital Medical University Affiliated Beijing Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.

Pain Medicine Centre, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.

出版信息

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Sep 3;23(1):835. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05791-y.

DOI:10.1186/s12891-022-05791-y
PMID:36057592
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9440536/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A symptomatic postoperative pseudocyst (PP) is a cystic lesion that is formed in the operation area of the intervertebral disc, leading to worse symptoms. Some minority patients who developed PP experienced rapidly aggravating symptoms and could not be treated by any kind of conservative treatment. However, no clinical studies have evaluated the clinical characteristics and surgical strategies of symptomatic PP requiring a revision surgery after full-endoscopic lumbar discectomy (FELD). This study aimed to demonstrate the clinical characteristics and surgical strategies of symptomatic PP requiring a revision surgery after FELD.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients who received FELD revision surgeries due to symptomatic PP formation between January 2016 and December 2021. Common characteristics, time intervals of symptom recurrence and revision surgery, strategies for conservative treatment and revision surgery, operative time, imaging characteristics, numeric rating scale (NRS) score, Oswestry disability index (ODI) and overall outcome rating based on modified MacNab criteria were analyzed.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients (males = 10, females = 4), with a mean age of 24.4 years, were enrolled. The mean time intervals of symptom recurrence and revision surgery were 43.5 and 18.9 days respectively. While the patients were conservatively managed with analgesics and physical therapy, pain persisted or progressively worsened. In comparison to the initial herniated disc, the PP was larger in 11 cases, and up- or down-migrated in four cases. The PP location included the lateral recess (n = 12), foraminal (n = 1), and centrolateral (n = 1) zones. One of the two cases treated by percutaneous aspiration (PA) was eventually treated by FELD as pain was not relieved. Follow-ups revealed an improved mean NRS score from 7.1 to 1.4, mean ODI from 68.6 to 7.9% and promising overall surgical outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The progressively severe pain experienced due to PP might be a result of its enlargement or migration to the lateral recess and foraminal zones. As complete removal of capsule is the goal, we recommend FELD instead of PA.

摘要

背景

术后症状性假性囊肿(PP)是一种在椎间盘手术区域形成的囊性病变,导致症状加重。少数出现 PP 的患者症状迅速加重,任何保守治疗都无法缓解。然而,目前尚无临床研究评估全内镜下腰椎间盘切除术(FELD)后需要翻修手术的症状性 PP 的临床特征和手术策略。本研究旨在展示 FELD 后因症状性 PP 形成而需要翻修手术的患者的临床特征和手术策略。

方法

我们回顾性分析了 2016 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月期间因症状性 PP 形成而接受 FELD 翻修手术的患者的数据。分析了一般特征、症状复发和翻修手术的时间间隔、保守治疗和翻修手术的策略、手术时间、影像学特征、数字评分量表(NRS)评分、Oswestry 残疾指数(ODI)以及根据改良 MacNab 标准的总体疗效评分。

结果

共纳入 14 例患者(男 10 例,女 4 例),平均年龄 24.4 岁。症状复发和翻修手术的平均时间间隔分别为 43.5 和 18.9 天。当患者接受镇痛药物和物理治疗的保守治疗时,疼痛持续存在或逐渐加重。与初始突出物相比,11 例患者的假性囊肿增大,4 例患者假性囊肿向上或向下迁移。假性囊肿的位置包括侧隐窝(n=12)、椎间孔(n=1)和中央旁区(n=1)。2 例接受经皮抽吸(PA)治疗的患者中,1 例因疼痛未缓解而最终接受 FELD 治疗。随访发现,NRS 评分从 7.1 改善至 1.4,ODI 从 68.6%改善至 7.9%,总体手术效果良好。

结论

PP 引起的疼痛逐渐加重可能是由于其增大或迁移至侧隐窝和椎间孔区所致。由于囊壁的完全切除是目标,我们建议采用 FELD 而不是 PA。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e4e/9440536/5b74ea59eef0/12891_2022_5791_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e4e/9440536/417bb9a6e84d/12891_2022_5791_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e4e/9440536/af0f2c8e0419/12891_2022_5791_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e4e/9440536/b800574bed9e/12891_2022_5791_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e4e/9440536/380863f1021f/12891_2022_5791_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e4e/9440536/5b74ea59eef0/12891_2022_5791_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e4e/9440536/417bb9a6e84d/12891_2022_5791_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e4e/9440536/af0f2c8e0419/12891_2022_5791_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e4e/9440536/b800574bed9e/12891_2022_5791_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e4e/9440536/380863f1021f/12891_2022_5791_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e4e/9440536/5b74ea59eef0/12891_2022_5791_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Revision surgery for symptomatic postoperative pseudocyst following full-endoscopic lumbar discectomy: clinical characteristics and surgical strategies.全内镜腰椎间盘切除术术后症状性假性囊肿的翻修手术:临床特点和手术策略。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Sep 3;23(1):835. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05791-y.
2
Does Immediate Postoperative Early Ambulation Affect Clinical Results of Full-Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy? A Historical Control Study of Daytime Operation with a 8-Hour Hospital Stay versus Inpatient Operation.即刻术后早期活动是否会影响全内镜腰椎间盘切除术的临床效果?日间 8 小时住院手术与住院手术的历史对照研究。
Orthop Surg. 2023 Sep;15(9):2354-2362. doi: 10.1111/os.13814. Epub 2023 Jul 31.
3
Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy, microendoscopic discectomy, and microdiscectomy for symptomatic lumbar disc herniation: minimum 2-year follow-up results.经皮内镜下经椎间孔椎间盘切除术、显微内镜下椎间盘切除术和显微椎间盘切除术治疗症状性腰椎间盘突出症的比较:至少2年的随访结果
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Mar;28(3):317-325. doi: 10.3171/2017.6.SPINE172. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
4
Biportal endoscopic versus microscopic discectomy for lumbar herniated disc: a randomized controlled trial.双孔通道内镜与显微镜下腰椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的随机对照试验
Spine J. 2023 Jan;23(1):18-26. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.09.003. Epub 2022 Sep 23.
5
Modified Percutaneous Lumbar Foraminoplasty and Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy: Instrument Design, Technique Notes, and 5 Years Follow-up.改良经皮腰椎椎间孔成形术与经皮内镜下腰椎间盘切除术:器械设计、技术要点及5年随访
Pain Physician. 2017 Jan-Feb;20(1):E85-E98.
6
Percutaneous lumbar foraminoplasty and percutaneous endoscopic lumbar decompression for lateral recess stenosis through transforaminal approach: Technique notes and 2 years follow-up.经椎间孔入路的经皮腰椎椎间孔成形术和经皮内镜下腰椎减压治疗侧隐窝狭窄:技术要点及2年随访
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2016 Apr;143:90-4. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2016.02.008. Epub 2016 Feb 10.
7
Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes of Full-Endoscopic Visualized Foraminoplasty and Discectomy Versus Microdiscectomy for Lumbar Disc Herniation.全内窥镜可视化椎管成形术与椎间盘切除术和小切口椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效比较。
Orthop Surg. 2022 Feb;14(2):280-289. doi: 10.1111/os.13087. Epub 2021 Dec 16.
8
Evaluation of full-endoscopic lumbar discectomy in the treatment of obese adolescents with lumbar disc herniation: a retrospective study.评价全内镜下腰椎间盘切除术治疗肥胖青少年腰椎间盘突出症:一项回顾性研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Jun 19;22(1):562. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04449-5.
9
Revision Strategy of Symptomatic Lumbar Adjacent Segment Degeneration: Full Endoscopic Decompression versus Extended Posterior Interbody Fusion.症状性腰椎相邻节段退变的翻修策略:全内镜减压与延长后路椎体间融合术。
World Neurosurg. 2020 Oct;142:e215-e222. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.06.168. Epub 2020 Jun 27.
10
Postoperative Pain Management after Full Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy: An Observational Study.全内镜下腰椎间盘切除术的术后疼痛管理:一项观察性研究。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Dec 9;58(12):1817. doi: 10.3390/medicina58121817.

引用本文的文献

1
Single-Cell Microgel Encapsulation Improves the Therapeutic Efficacy of Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Treating Intervertebral Disc Degeneration via Inhibiting Pyroptosis.单细胞微凝胶封装通过抑制细胞焦亡提高间充质干细胞治疗椎间盘退变的疗效
Research (Wash D C). 2024 Feb 16;7:0311. doi: 10.34133/research.0311. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Symptomatic postoperative discal pseudocyst following percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy: A case report and review of the literature.经皮内镜腰椎间盘切除术术后症状性椎间盘假性囊肿:病例报告及文献复习。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Jan 22;100(3):e24026. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000024026.
2
Symptomatic Postoperative Discal Pseudocyst After Percutaneous Endoscopic Interlaminar Discectomy: Case Report and Literature Review.经皮内镜椎间孔入路椎间盘切除术术后症状性椎间盘假性囊肿:病例报告及文献复习。
Orthop Surg. 2021 Feb;13(1):347-352. doi: 10.1111/os.12863. Epub 2020 Dec 16.
3
Redefining the Evolution of Spinal Discal Cyst Under Percutaneous Endoscopy: Report of Two Cases.
经皮内镜下重新定义椎间盘囊肿的演变:两例报告
Asian J Neurosurg. 2019 Jul-Sep;14(3):890-893. doi: 10.4103/ajns.AJNS_27_18.
4
Nonsurgical integrative Korean Medicine treatment of discal cyst: A case report and a retrospective chart review analysis.非手术综合韩医学治疗椎间盘囊肿:一例病例报告及回顾性病历分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jul;98(27):e16189. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016189.
5
A Rare Case of a Discal Cyst Following Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy via a Transforaminal Approach.经椎间孔入路经皮内镜下腰椎间盘切除术后出现椎间盘囊肿的罕见病例。
Int J Spine Surg. 2019 Feb 22;13(1):92-94. doi: 10.14444/6012. eCollection 2019 Jan.
6
Spontaneous regression of a discal cyst: a physiopathological hypothesis.椎间盘囊肿的自发消退:一种病理生理假说。
J Neurosurg Sci. 2020 Jun;64(3):304-307. doi: 10.23736/S0390-5616.18.04427-2. Epub 2018 May 28.
7
Different operative findings of cases predicted to be symptomatic discal pseudocysts after percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy.经皮内镜下腰椎间盘切除术后预计为症状性椎间盘假性囊肿病例的不同手术发现。
J Spine Surg. 2017 Jun;3(2):233-237. doi: 10.21037/jss.2017.05.07.
8
Post-discectomy annular pseudocyst: A rare cause of failed back syndrome.椎间盘切除术后环状假性囊肿:腰椎术后失败综合征的罕见原因。
Neurol India. 2017 May-Jun;65(3):650-652. doi: 10.4103/neuroindia.NI_558_16.
9
Long-term Follow-up Results of Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy.经皮内镜下腰椎间盘切除术的长期随访结果
Pain Physician. 2016 Nov-Dec;19(8):E1161-E1166.
10
Successful Treatment of a Symptomatic Discal Cyst by Percutaneous C-arm Guided Aspiration.经皮C型臂引导下抽吸术成功治疗有症状的椎间盘囊肿
Korean J Pain. 2016 Apr;29(2):129-35. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2016.29.2.129. Epub 2016 Apr 1.