• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Providers' Perspectives on High-Quality Dementia Care in Long-Term Care.长期护理中高质量痴呆症护理的提供者观点。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2022 Dec;23(12):2030.e1-2030.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2022.07.025. Epub 2022 Sep 2.
2
Supporting the "hallway residents": a qualitative descriptive study of staff perspectives on implementing the Namaste Care intervention in long-term care.支持“走廊居民”:一项关于工作人员对长期护理中实施 Namaste 护理干预看法的定性描述性研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Oct 16;23(1):661. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04360-9.
3
Active involvement in scientific research of persons living with dementia and long-term care users: a systematic review of existing methods with a specific focus on good practices, facilitators and barriers of involvement.痴呆症患者和长期护理使用者积极参与科学研究:对现有方法的系统评价,特别关注参与的良好实践、促进因素和障碍。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Apr 9;24(1):324. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-04877-7.
4
Qualitative Insights into the Working Conditions of Personal Support Workers in Long-Term Care in the Context of a Person-Centered Communication Training Intervention.定性洞察以人以中心的沟通培训干预背景下长期护理中个人支持工作者的工作条件。
Res Gerontol Nurs. 2021 Sep-Oct;14(5):245-253. doi: 10.3928/19404921-20210708-01. Epub 2021 Jul 22.
5
Perspectives of substitute decision-makers and staff about person-centred physical activity in long-term care.替代决策人和工作人员对长期护理中以患者为中心的身体活动的看法。
Health Expect. 2022 Oct;25(5):2155-2165. doi: 10.1111/hex.13381. Epub 2021 Nov 8.
6
Nurse-Led Virtual Delivery of PIECES in Canadian Long-Term Care Homes to Support the Care of Older Adults Experiencing Responsive Behaviors During COVID-19: Qualitative Descriptive Study.在加拿大长期护理院中由护士主导的PIECES虚拟服务,以支持在COVID-19期间对出现反应性行为的老年人的护理:定性描述性研究
JMIR Nurs. 2022 Dec 13;5(1):e42731. doi: 10.2196/42731.
7
Elicitation of quantitative, choice-based preferences for Person-Centered Care among People living with Dementia in comparison to physicians' judgements in Germany: study protocol for the mixed-methods PreDemCare-study.在德国,与医生的判断相比,从生活在痴呆症中的人群中引出对以患者为中心的护理的定量、基于选择的偏好:混合方法 PreDemCare 研究的研究方案。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Jul 8;22(1):567. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03238-6.
8
Facilitators and barriers to implement nurse-led interventions in long-term dementia care: a qualitative interview study with Swiss nursing experts and managers.在长期痴呆症护理中实施护士主导干预的促进因素和障碍:对瑞士护理专家和管理人员的定性访谈研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2021 Mar 5;21(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02120-1.
9
Communication in home care: Understanding the lived experiences of formal caregivers communicating with persons living with dementia.居家护理中的沟通:理解正式照护者与痴呆症患者沟通的生活体验。
Int J Older People Nurs. 2021 Nov;16(6):e12401. doi: 10.1111/opn.12401. Epub 2021 Aug 1.
10
Experiences of Families, Staff, Volunteers, and Administrators With Namaste Care for Persons With Advanced Dementia in Canadian Long-Term Care Homes.加拿大长期护理之家接受 Namaste 关爱对晚期痴呆患者的家庭、工作人员、志愿者和管理人员的体验。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2024 May;25(5):830-836. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2023.08.012. Epub 2023 Sep 11.

引用本文的文献

1
The dementia care workforce: Essential to care but large research gaps exist.痴呆症护理人员:护理工作的关键,但存在重大研究空白。
Alzheimers Dement. 2025 May;21(5):e70269. doi: 10.1002/alz.70269.
2
Effect of Types of Dementia Care on Quality of Life and Mental Health Factors in Caregivers of Patients with Dementia: A Cross-Sectional Study.痴呆症护理类型对痴呆症患者照料者生活质量和心理健康因素的影响:一项横断面研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Apr 27;11(9):1245. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11091245.

本文引用的文献

1
Pragmatic Trials in Long-Term Care: Implementation and Dissemination Challenges and Opportunities.长期护理中的实用临床试验:实施和传播的挑战与机遇。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2022 Mar;23(3):339-344. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2021.11.024. Epub 2021 Dec 14.
2
Chronic Care, Dementia Care Management, and Financial Considerations.慢性护理、痴呆症护理管理和财务考虑。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021 Jul;22(7):1371-1376. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2021.05.012. Epub 2021 May 31.
3
Nursing home staff's perceptions of barriers and needs in implementing person-centred care for people living with dementia: A qualitative study.养老院工作人员对实施以痴呆患者为中心的护理的障碍和需求的看法:一项定性研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2022 Jul;31(13-14):1896-1906. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15729. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
4
What Is Really Needed to Provide Effective, Person-Centered Care for Behavioral Expressions of Dementia? Guidance from The Alzheimer's Association Dementia Care Provider Roundtable.为痴呆患者的行为表现提供有效、以患者为中心的护理真正需要什么?来自阿尔茨海默病协会痴呆症护理提供者圆桌会议的指导。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020 Nov;21(11):1582-1586.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.05.017. Epub 2020 Jul 25.
5
Embedded Pragmatic Trials in Dementia Care: Realizing the Vision of the NIA IMPACT Collaboratory.痴呆症护理中的嵌入式实用临床试验:实现 NIA IMPACT 协作研究的愿景。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Jul;68 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S1-S7. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16621.
6
Engaging Stakeholders in the Design and Conduct of Embedded Pragmatic Clinical Trials for Alzheimer's Disease and Alzheimer's Disease-Related Dementias.参与阿尔茨海默病和阿尔茨海默病相关痴呆症嵌入式实用临床试验的设计和实施。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Jul;68 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S62-S67. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16630.
7
Challenges of conducting research in long-term care facilities: a systematic review.在长期护理机构中进行研究的挑战:系统评价。
BMC Geriatr. 2018 Oct 12;18(1):242. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0934-9.
8
Impact of person-centred care training and person-centred activities on quality of life, agitation, and antipsychotic use in people with dementia living in nursing homes: A cluster-randomised controlled trial.以人为主的照护训练和活动对养老院老年痴呆患者生活质量、激越和抗精神病药物使用的影响:一项整群随机对照试验。
PLoS Med. 2018 Feb 6;15(2):e1002500. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002500. eCollection 2018 Feb.
9
Member Checking: A Tool to Enhance Trustworthiness or Merely a Nod to Validation?成员核对:一种增强可信度的工具还是仅仅是对验证的认可?
Qual Health Res. 2016 Nov;26(13):1802-1811. doi: 10.1177/1049732316654870. Epub 2016 Jul 10.
10
Advanced dementia: state of the art and priorities for the next decade.晚期痴呆:未来十年的现状和重点。
Ann Intern Med. 2012 Jan 3;156(1 Pt 1):45-51. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-1-201201030-00008.

长期护理中高质量痴呆症护理的提供者观点。

Providers' Perspectives on High-Quality Dementia Care in Long-Term Care.

机构信息

Rory Meyers College of Nursing, New York University, New York, NY, USA.

Center for Long-Term Care Quality & Innovation, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA.

出版信息

J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2022 Dec;23(12):2030.e1-2030.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2022.07.025. Epub 2022 Sep 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.jamda.2022.07.025
PMID:36058295
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11307288/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To understand dementia care providers' perspectives on high-quality care for persons living with dementia (PLWD) in long-term care (LTC).

DESIGN

A qualitative study using a directed content analysis approach.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Nine national LTC dementia care providers.

METHODS

We facilitated 5 listening sessions centered around dementia care philosophies, models, and practices. Two researchers first mapped qualitative data to the Holistic Approach to Transformational Change (HATCh) model for dementia care using a directed content analysis approach. They then identified themes and subthemes emerging from the data using a conventional analysis approach. They coded data iteratively and solicited input from 3 additional researchers to reach consensus where needed. Member checks were performed to ensure the trustworthiness of the data during 2 follow-up listening sessions.

RESULTS

The 9 participants described the importance of understanding the experiences of PLWDs in order to provide high-quality dementia care and to deliver such care with the residents and their preferences as the focus. They emphasized experiential education as essential for families and all staff, regardless of role. They noted the need to balance safety with resident choice, as well as the corresponding need for facility leadership and regulators to support such choices. The listening sessions revealed areas to foster person-centered care for PLWD, but also highlighted barriers to implementing this philosophy in LTC settings.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Emergent themes included care practices that center on resident preferences and are supported by staff with the experiential education and communication skills necessary to relate to and support PLWD. These findings provide contextual information for researchers seeking to identify and test interventions that reflect LTC providers' priorities for PLWD and emphasize the need to align research priorities with provider priorities.

摘要

目的

了解长期护理(LTC)中痴呆症照护者对痴呆症患者(PLWD)高质量照护的看法。

设计

采用有导向内容分析方法的定性研究。

地点和参与者

9 名全国 LTC 痴呆症照护提供者。

方法

我们围绕痴呆症照护理念、模式和实践,组织了 5 次聆听会议。两名研究人员首先使用有导向内容分析方法,将定性数据映射到痴呆症照护的整体方法转化变革(HATCh)模型。然后,他们使用常规分析方法,从数据中确定主题和子主题。他们迭代地对数据进行编码,并在需要时征求 3 名额外研究人员的意见以达成共识。在 2 次后续聆听会议中,进行了成员检查以确保数据的可信度。

结果

9 名参与者描述了理解 PLWD 体验的重要性,以便提供高质量的痴呆症照护,并将这种照护以居民及其偏好为中心。他们强调体验式教育对家庭和所有员工的重要性,无论其角色如何。他们指出需要在安全性和居民选择之间取得平衡,同时也需要设施领导和监管机构支持这些选择。聆听会议揭示了促进 PLWD 以人为主的照护的领域,但也突出了在 LTC 环境中实施这一理念的障碍。

结论和意义

出现的主题包括以居民偏好为中心的照护实践,并得到具有相关体验式教育和沟通技能的员工的支持,这些技能对于与 PLWD 建立联系和提供支持是必要的。这些发现为研究人员提供了背景信息,他们希望确定和测试反映 LTC 提供者对 PLWD 优先事项的干预措施,并强调需要使研究重点与提供者的优先事项保持一致。