学术急诊医师的师资发展：焦点小组分析
Faculty Development for Academic Emergency Physicians: A Focus Group Analysis.
作者信息
Pandit Kiran, Coates Wendy C, Diercks Deborah, Gupta Sanjey, Siegelman Jeffrey
机构信息
Emergency Medicine, Columbia University, New York City, USA.
Emergency Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, USA.
出版信息
Cureus. 2022 Aug 2;14(8):e27596. doi: 10.7759/cureus.27596. eCollection 2022 Aug.
OBJECTIVES
The objective is to explore academic emergency medicine physicians' exposure to and needs regarding faculty development.
METHODS
We conducted a prospective qualitative study of Society for Academic Emergency Medicine members in 2018 using focus groups selected by convenience and snowball sampling. One facilitator ensured representative engagement and responses were transcribed in real-time by an assistant after obtaining verbal consent. Results were analyzed using a grounded theory approach with a constructivist perspective. Thematic analysis was refined using the constant comparative method.
RESULTS
Sixteen physicians participated in the focus groups, representing a diverse group of perspectives. Six themes emerged about unmet needs in faculty development: knowledge and skills, relationships, specific programs or resources, and professional benefits.
CONCLUSIONS
Members of a national academic society identified three areas of focus important to developing academicians in emergency medicine: content for faculty developers, relationship-building among members, and support from the organization as a "professional home." Academic societies can use this to guide future programming.
目的
探讨学术急诊医学医师在师资发展方面的接触情况和需求。
方法
2018年，我们对学术急诊医学协会成员进行了一项前瞻性定性研究，采用便利抽样和滚雪球抽样选取焦点小组。一名主持人确保有代表性的参与，并在获得口头同意后由一名助手实时转录回复。结果采用基于建构主义视角的扎根理论方法进行分析。主题分析采用持续比较法进行完善。
结果
16名医师参与了焦点小组，代表了不同的观点。出现了六个关于师资发展中未满足需求的主题：知识和技能、人际关系、特定项目或资源以及职业福利。
结论
一个全国性学术协会的成员确定了对培养急诊医学领域院士至关重要的三个重点领域：师资培训者的内容、成员之间的关系建立以及来自作为“专业之家”的组织的支持。学术协会可以利用这一点来指导未来的规划。
Zotero 插件