• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

解构阴谋论思维:阴谋论背后的计算逻辑

Deconstructing the Conspiratorial Mind: the Computational Logic Behind Conspiracy Theories.

作者信息

Rigoli Francesco

机构信息

Department of Psychology, City, University of London, Northampton Square, London, EC1V 0HB UK.

出版信息

Rev Philos Psychol. 2022 Aug 27:1-18. doi: 10.1007/s13164-022-00657-7.

DOI:10.1007/s13164-022-00657-7
PMID:36060095
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9417594/
Abstract

In the social sciences, research on conspiracy theories is accumulating fast. To contribute to this research, here I introduce a computational model about the psychological processes underlying support for conspiracy theories. The proposal is that endorsement of these theories depends on three factors: prior beliefs, novel evidence, and expected consequences. Thanks to the latter, a conspiracy hypothesis might be selected because it is the costliest to reject even if it is not the best supported by evidence and by prior beliefs (i.e., even if it is not the most accurate). In this way, the model implies a key role for motivated reasoning. By examining the social conditions that favour the success of conspiracy theories, the paper embeds the model, whose focus is primarily psychological, within the broader social context, and applies this analysis to probe the role of conspiracy theories within contemporary Western societies. Altogether, the paper argues that a computational outlook can contribute to elucidate the socio-psychological dynamics underlying the attractiveness of conspiracy theories.

摘要

在社会科学领域,关于阴谋论的研究正在迅速积累。为推动这项研究,在此我介绍一个关于支持阴谋论背后心理过程的计算模型。该模型认为,对这些理论的认同取决于三个因素:先验信念、新证据和预期后果。由于存在预期后果,一个阴谋假设可能会被选中,因为即使它在证据和先验信念方面并非最具支持力(即即便它不是最准确的),但拒绝它的成本却是最高的。通过这种方式,该模型暗示了动机性推理的关键作用。通过审视有利于阴谋论成功的社会条件,本文将这个主要聚焦于心理层面的模型置于更广阔的社会背景中,并运用这一分析来探究阴谋论在当代西方社会中的作用。总体而言,本文认为计算视角有助于阐明阴谋论吸引力背后的社会心理动态。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/035f/9417594/6e1ff768a99a/13164_2022_657_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/035f/9417594/0a327fdef589/13164_2022_657_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/035f/9417594/14f6e74cddbc/13164_2022_657_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/035f/9417594/6e1ff768a99a/13164_2022_657_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/035f/9417594/0a327fdef589/13164_2022_657_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/035f/9417594/14f6e74cddbc/13164_2022_657_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/035f/9417594/6e1ff768a99a/13164_2022_657_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Deconstructing the Conspiratorial Mind: the Computational Logic Behind Conspiracy Theories.解构阴谋论思维:阴谋论背后的计算逻辑
Rev Philos Psychol. 2022 Aug 27:1-18. doi: 10.1007/s13164-022-00657-7.
2
The usual suspects: How psychological motives and thinking styles predict the endorsement of well-known and COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs.常见因素:心理动机和思维方式如何预测对知名及新冠病毒相关阴谋论的认同。
Appl Cogn Psychol. 2021 Sep-Oct;35(5):1171-1181. doi: 10.1002/acp.3844. Epub 2021 May 26.
3
Content matters. Different predictors and social consequences of general and government-related conspiracy theories on COVID-19.内容很重要。关于新冠疫情的一般阴谋论和与政府相关的阴谋论的不同预测因素及社会后果。
Pers Individ Dif. 2021 Jan 1;168:110289. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2020.110289. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
4
Conspiratorial Beliefs and Cognitive Styles: An Integrated Look on Analytic Thinking, Critical Thinking, and Scientific Reasoning in Relation to (Dis)trust in Conspiracy Theories.阴谋论信念与认知风格:关于分析性思维、批判性思维和科学推理与对阴谋论的(不)信任之间关系的综合审视。
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 12;12:736838. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.736838. eCollection 2021.
5
[Conspiracy theories and COVID-19: How do conspiracy beliefs arise?].[阴谋论与新冠疫情:阴谋信念是如何产生的?]
Encephale. 2022 Oct;48(5):571-582. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2021.12.005. Epub 2022 Feb 7.
6
Narcissistic susceptibility to conspiracy beliefs exaggerated by education, reduced by cognitive reflection.教育会加剧自恋者对阴谋论的轻信,而认知反思则会减轻这种轻信。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jul 6;14:1164725. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1164725. eCollection 2023.
7
"I Did My Own Research": Overconfidence, (Dis)trust in Science, and Endorsement of Conspiracy Theories.“我做了自己的研究”:过度自信、对科学的(不)信任以及对阴谋论的认同
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 14;13:931865. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.931865. eCollection 2022.
8
Of tinfoil hats and thinking caps: Reasoning is more strongly related to implausible than plausible conspiracy beliefs.对于锡箔帽和思考帽:推理与难以置信的阴谋信念比可信的阴谋信念更紧密相关。
Cognition. 2022 Jan;218:104956. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104956. Epub 2021 Nov 20.
9
[Are conspiracy theorists psychotic? A comparison between conspiracy theories and paranoid delusions].[阴谋论者患有精神病吗?阴谋论与偏执妄想的比较]
Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2021;63(11):775-781.
10
Injustice Without Evidence: The Unique Role of Conspiracy Theories in Social Justice Research.无证据的不公:阴谋论在社会正义研究中的独特作用
Soc Justice Res. 2022;35(1):88-106. doi: 10.1007/s11211-021-00376-x. Epub 2021 Sep 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Conspiracy beliefs and perceptual inference in times of political uncertainty.政治不确定性时期的阴谋论信念与感知推理
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 18;14(1):9001. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-59434-4.

本文引用的文献

1
I want to believe: delusion, motivated reasoning, and Bayesian decision theory.我想相信:妄想、动机推理和贝叶斯决策理论。
Cogn Neuropsychiatry. 2021 Nov;26(6):408-420. doi: 10.1080/13546805.2021.1982686. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
2
Computational and neurocognitive approaches to the political brain: key insights and future avenues for political neuroscience.计算神经科学与政治大脑:政治神经科学的关键见解与未来方向
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Apr 12;376(1822):20200130. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0130. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
3
Conspiracy theories in the era of COVID-19: A tale of two pandemics.
新冠疫情时代的阴谋论:两场大流行的故事。
Int J Clin Pract. 2021 Feb;75(2):e13778. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.13778.
4
The rational continued influence of misinformation.错误信息的理性持续影响。
Cognition. 2020 Dec;205:104453. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104453. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
5
The impact of partial source dependence on belief and reliability revision.部分源依赖对信念和可靠性修正的影响。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2020 Sep;46(9):1795-1805. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000846. Epub 2020 May 21.
6
Charting adult development through (historically changing) daily stress processes.通过(历史上不断变化的)日常压力过程来描绘成人发展。
Am Psychol. 2020 May-Jun;75(4):511-524. doi: 10.1037/amp0000597.
7
The epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment of COVID-19.新型冠状病毒肺炎的流行病学、诊断与治疗。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020 May;55(5):105955. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105955. Epub 2020 Mar 28.
8
What breeds conspiracy antisemitism? The role of political uncontrollability and uncertainty in the belief in Jewish conspiracy.是什么助长了反犹阴谋论?政治失控和不确定性在犹太阴谋论信仰中的作用。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2020 May;118(5):900-918. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000183. Epub 2020 Jan 6.
9
Belief in conspiracy theories: Basic principles of an emerging research domain.对阴谋论的信念:一个新兴研究领域的基本原则。
Eur J Soc Psychol. 2018 Dec;48(7):897-908. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2530. Epub 2018 Aug 24.
10
Conspiracy Theories: Evolved Functions and Psychological Mechanisms.阴谋论:进化功能与心理机制。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2018 Nov;13(6):770-788. doi: 10.1177/1745691618774270. Epub 2018 Sep 19.